A Pro White (NOT supremacist) talks to young Americans.....

Surely by nature being pro one race or another makes you a supremacist.

Why would mixing thousand of years of white genes and thousands of years of black genes be bad?

Could only be arsed to watch a couple of minutes, agree with the bloke sitting down on the left though. I'm utterly indifferent to the prospect of everyone eventually ending up coffee-coloured, tbh.

Edit: Watched to the end. OP, you chose a terrible video to try and make your point- the old guy gets pwned every step of the way.

The guy's a bit thick. The logical conclusion of his argument that you shouldn't have kids with people of other races because you will lose your genetic heritage is that incest is the best thing to do, as your relatives are the closest to you genetically, and thus your genetic heritage is best preserved. This is patently bull**** (see most European royal houses for examples of why a small gene pool is bad). Genetic diversity is vital to the survival of a species. Also, at the risk of reductio ad hitlerum, the idea that the genes of one race are superior to those of another is a little, eugenicsy for my taste.

(Original post by chrisawhitmore)
The guy's a bit thick. The logical conclusion of his argument that you shouldn't have kids with people of other races because you will lose your genetic heritage is that incest is the best thing to do, as your relatives are the closest to you genetically, and thus your genetic heritage is best preserved. This is patently bull**** (see most European royal houses for examples of why a small gene pool is bad). Genetic diversity is vital to the survival of a species. Also, at the risk of reductio ad hitlerum, the idea that the genes of one race are superior to those of another is a little, eugenicsy for my taste.

Good point!

He seems to make an odd argument, that if one of the white girls decides to get together with a black guy ..it would wrong to do such a thing as other countries don't allow it such as African countries and China.. to preserve their heritage.

Africa/China probably don't allow the mixing due to cultural differences. What if an ordinary black american man, whose family has lived there for years, decides to have a relationship with a white american woman.. they grew up in the same country and adopted the same culture.. Other than the obvious difference of their skin colour, how would he argue that it is still wrong?

He is a ****. I wish I could neg you but I've used up the posts I can rate. Firstly he's scientifically wrong because breeding with people who are genetically similar to you in heritage will result in a smaller gene pool and more chance of genetic disease. And so long as my baby came out healthy, and without genetic diseases, I'm pretty sure I wouldn't care about what colour it was. I mean come on.


Edit - Also, what makes him "NOT supremacist"?
Edit - I got warned for this because I put too many letters at the end of my swear word I used for the guy, and they thought I was doing it to avoid the filter. In fact it was just to emphasize how much of a _________ he is :P I didn't think just the word on its own would suffice

The irony of him talking about keeping China Chinese when America is not originally European...!

(Original post by Strüberry)
The irony of him talking about keeping China Chinese when America is not originally European...!

The United States of America is originally European-American.




I didn't care much for his argument but you saw something important when he asked the "Irish American" if it was acceptable that Ireland was being flooded with Nigerians.

A country engages in a bloody war for its independence, right to rule themselves and their right to preserve their language, heritage and culture. All to be ethnically replaced from the inside.

I'm not concerned with the entire population of humans becoming mixed race, but I am concerned about just whites disappearing.

(Original post by kevkevkev)


That’s your opinion. Have you heard of Dysgenics?

Yes, I have, and for those that haven't, it is the theory that as those with a greater level of education in modern society tend to have less children, stupidity becomes a genetically selected trait, leading to effective devolution in the more prolific underclass. However, this man's policies practically encourage dysgenics, by encouraging people to only breed with those from a similar area (in this case the usa). As such, the dysgenic effect will not be disrupted by inflows of new genes from outside of the area. Dysgenics is far worse, and far more likely in a closed off gene pool.

(Original post by kevkevkev)
All nations are made by immigration. All nations die by immigration. A million words have been written about the fall of Rome when it can be summed up with five……it ran out of Romans.

Actually, the purest Roman bloodline was always that of the Emperors. The fact that centuries of inbreeding produced Emperors unfit to rule actually kind of undermines your point.

(Original post by getfunky!)
Good point!

He seems to make an odd argument, that if one of the white girls decides to get together with a black guy ..it would wrong to do such a thing as other countries don't allow it such as African countries and China.. to preserve their heritage.

Africa/China probably don't allow the mixing due to cultural differences. What if an ordinary black american man, whose family has lived there for years, decides to have a relationship with a white american woman.. they grew up in the same country and adopted the same culture.. Other than the obvious difference of their skin colour, how would he argue that it is still wrong?

Also, who the hell looks to China and Africa for good examples of civil rights policy?

(Original post by kevkevkev)
I think you have picked him up wrong. He is suggesting that they bred with fellow people of Indo European stock. They can be from Germany, they can be from Ireland or wherever you like. He is not telling them to bred with people from a similar area.

However that is not really the point here. No one is telling the indigenous people of China, Japan, Korea, Israel, and all the 50 plus countries in Africa they need to be made more genetically diverse and flooding them with people not of their kind. This is only happening in all white countries. Its slow genocide through racial replacement.

No one is telling European or US citizens who to have kids with. I'm pretty glad they aren't. And including Japan was a bad move, as their indigenous population will soon be extinct at the rate they are going. The fact is that western society is built on tolerance. . I believe that a person is better judged on their values than their skin colour, and as such I would consider many people of african and asian origin I know to be far more western than that man.

Why does this guy care about who other people breed with?

Funny how all the diversophiles are actually quite comfortable with the disappearance of all human diversity, for example;

(Original post by creak)
Could only be arsed to watch a couple of minutes, agree with the bloke sitting down on the left though. I'm utterly indifferent to the prospect of everyone eventually ending up coffee-coloured, tbh.

Wave bye-bye to human diversity; blond hair, brown hair, red hair, green eyes, blue eyes, and so on... all 'coffee-coloured'. So much for diversity.

(Original post by kevkevkev)
No it was deliberate to include Japan. Think about what you just typed. Despite the fact "their indigenous population will soon be extinct at the rate they are going." no one is insisting Japan must be flooded with Non Japanese. This is only happening in all white countries. Its genocide.

I think what that guy should have asked were the following

1) Do they think it is fair, that only white countries are expected to be diverse and only white children are affected by it?

2) Do they know that race is not a social construct under International Law

3) Do they know the UN Genocide Laws, specifically point out that genocide need not be violent?

4) Finally, if they think it is fair that only white countries are targets for genocide, will they name one non-white country, they would flood with millions of people that are not their race and will they name a specifically non-white race, they would flood them with?

I think that would have been a much more interesting debate.

I said this in another thread and I'll say it here....

The main problem with the younger generation of white people today is the majority are anitwhite. It amazes me that they can't see how the push for third world non white immigration into ALL white countries and ONLY white countries is straight genocide. The younger white people today seem to be almost applauding the genocide of their race by supporting the opening of our borders and accepting they have to "assimilate" with these non whites.

White people will support petitions and causes like..........

http://www.saveoursquirrels.org/pge/home/home_page.html
http://www.savethepolarbear.ca/
http://www.saveafricaschildren.org/
http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/...298471389.html

.....all day long but if i point out the precarious position of my race, the white race then i am somehow a "nazithatwantstokillsixmilli onje ws"

"Genocide involves the attempt to achieve the disappearance of a group by whatever means. It does not have to be violent, it could be a combination of policies that would lead to a certain group dying out.”
Malcolm Fraser (Prime Minister of Australia 1975-1983

It isn't genocide. In fact, no one even insists on allowing immigration (accept the shengen agreement which allows free passage for all EU citizens within the EU). If you are anti-immigration, you are free to go ahead and vote for the BNP or the Republicans or whatever nationalist party stands in your neck of the woods. The fact is, by popular demand, these parties and policies are not in power. The reason is simple. The western world has progressed from us and them, from defining by race, from the petty tribal squabbles that plagued our history.

If you wish to preserve your pure ethnicity, feel free, but do not interfere with the freedoms of others to do as they wish with their own bodies. The extinction of any number of so called pure races is a small price to pay for the freedom to do as we will with our own lives.

Also, you seem to have missed a crucial point in geography. The reason that the africans don't have massive immigration of other races is that Africa is, in general, a pretty awful place to live. In fact, that's probably why they are emigrating in the first place.

(Original post by Aj12)
Why would mixing thousand of years of white genes and thousands of years of black genes be bad?

A loss of diversity, cultural identity and national pride, for starters.

But I doubt you even care about any of those, shameful really.