This discussion is now closed.

Check out other Related discussions

The infamous Churchill college...

Not sure if anyone else had heard this, but a couple of Churchill college students played a nasty prank...

They were fined £1250...

Click Here to read more!

Any views?

Reply 1

thefish_uk

14

toto8462

Not sure if anyone else had heard this, but a couple of Churchill college students played a nasty prank...

They were fined £1250...

Click Here to read more!

Any views?

Hmmmmm.... very sick and wrong, but also creative.

Reply 2

Jigglypuff

16

That's horrible!
And they look so smug in the photo...

Reply 3

toto8462

OP

9

With so many animal rights activists around cambridge, they should fear for their well being...

Reply 4

adampogonowski

1

toto8462

With so many animal rights activists around cambridge, they should fear for their well being...

What do you expect? Looking at the Churchill building it looks like the place where they torture and experiment on animals!! Hehe - (that is a joke) - although I have to say Churchill is not the prettiest building I have ever laid my eyes on...

Reply 5

toto8462

OP

9

What do you expect? Looking at the Churchill building it looks like the place where they torture and experiment on animals!! Hehe - (that is a joke) - although I have to say Churchill is not the prettiest building I have ever laid my eyes on...

Unfortunately you will have to get used to it, considering you may well end up with a "balcony view" of churchill from your room!

Reply 6

Loocy

Tehe. Imagine having "abandoning a hamster in circumstances likely to cause suffering" on your criminal record. That would raise a few eyebrows if you had to have it checked for any reason...

Poor hamster though. :frown:

Reply 7

arunz

One of them went to my school - they got expelled in their second last year...

Reply 8

-x- Lici -x-

were they chucked from Churchill

Reply 9

The Albatross

12

a friend of mine knows them

Reply 10

Niccolo

6

pair of w**kers. They both need a kick in the head. Which i would be happy to personally administer if i was suitably 'plastered.'

Reply 11

Gravastar

11

I'm sorry, but it still doesn't beat the group of people a couple of years back that won a goldfish in a bag and some helium balloons at a fayre, and put two and two together...

Reply 12

DrCube

Niccolo

pair of w**kers. They both need a kick in the head. Which i would be happy to personally administer if i was suitably 'plastered.'

Yay, let's hurt people because they 'drunkenly' almost hurt animals!

Reply 13

apd35

9

I don't agree with the people who want violent recriminations against them, what with being a pacifist and all that, eh? I do, however, think their actions were sick and wrong!

Reply 14

adampogonowski

1

toto8462

Unfortunately you will have to get used to it, considering you may well end up with a "balcony view" of churchill from your room!

Yeah, I will have to get a first in the second year or be extremely lucky in the ballot to wind up in Gate House Court next year! Although, it would actually be in my fourth year as I plan to go to France for a year... You can't really see Churchill from there though can you?

Reply 15

CamSPSer

No they weren't expelled they are still here, though about a grand poorer

Reply 16

Niccolo

6

notyourpunk

No they weren't expelled they are still here, though about a grand poorer

I would do more than fine the bastards, what is more pathetic and cowardly than torturing a defenceless animal? (I know that this kind of thing has been said before, but i firmly believe it). And I am not a lunatic animal rights protestor, i agree that some scientfic research is regrettably unavoidable, but this kind of thing makes me sick. Even the pricks who did that thing to the goldfish need a slapping.

--------------

DrCube

Yay, let's hurt people because they 'drunkenly' almost hurt animals!

i have hurt people for less.

Reply 17

synaesthesia

9

Hmmm, interesting TCS read. Apparently they didn't seem drunk to the same shop that refused to serve them 2 weeks earlier for being inebriated... and the statement they read after the ruling? Don't send the hamster, idiots, if you don't want to spend enough money to buy water for 84 African villages :rolleyes:

Reply 18

Niccolo

6

synaesthesia

Hmmm, interesting TCS read. Apparently they didn't seem drunk to the same shop that refused to serve them 2 weeks earlier for being inebriated... and the statement they read after the ruling? Don't send the hamster, idiots, if you don't want to spend enough money to buy water for 84 African villages :rolleyes:

In all seriousness i doubt that they were drunk on this occasion, especially as they had tried to do the same thing previously (albeit whilst intoxicated the first time). Probably just a bull**it excuse for their sadism. How convenient it is to simply plea 'oh, but i was drunk,' and how difficult it is for anybody who thinks otherwise to challenge this defense.

Reply 19

apd35

9

Niccolo

In all seriousness i doubt that they were drunk on this occasion, especially as they had tried to do the same thing previously (albeit whilst intoxicated the first time). Probably just a bull**it excuse for their sadism. How convenient it is to simply plea 'oh, but i was drunk,' and how difficult it is for anybody who thinks otherwise to challenge this defense.

But that isn't a defence in any court of law, if anything it is an aggravating factor.

The infamous Churchill college...

Related discussions

Articles for you