(Original post by afcwill)
Two can play at that game............................ ...........
Everything I've said to you is justified literally, or has a meaning as opposed to ''C***'' which there is no purpose or justifiation for however you interpret it.
All said by you:
"You don't seem to make any credible points...you're too polarised."
That's not an insult. You yourself admitted you're biased. Look up the word polarised.
"Afcwill, You have this ingrained nepotism for some reason."
Nepotism in the form of raising Arsenal players and the club itself onto a pedestal. Again you yourself admitted you were biased, so this again is not an insult.
"How can anyone expect to take your views seriously when you have a memory of 3 weeks"
Nobody will take biased views, or views that don't have perspective, seriously. That's a fact, considering we're discussing something subjective. Therefore it's not an insult.
"if anything your attitude is one similar of such scallies and runts
I said your attitude (which is the key word, ie unprovoked swearing and general behaviour and denial) is similar to that of the scallies that abused Rooney when he left Everton. Read the whole paragraph in context again.
"Please get a grip
...if not, you may as well not post outside the Arsenal thread' because you add little value
You admitted you're biased and everyone knows it. Unless you change your ways nobody will listen to your points of view where non-Arsenal related threads are concerned.
"There's no emoticon for the joy I feel inside right now. Scally- case closed."
You made my point perfectly well. I said you exhibited certain Scally traits, and you then called my a ''C***''. I was very pleased you made my point for me, and I feel happy everytime you bring it up because it further vindicates me when you try and dig yourself a hole and say ''C***'' wasn't referring to me.
" Even if I had insulted you
, I don't swear so at least do me the courtesy of the same."
You're clutching at straws to the maximum now.
I admit maybe i shouldnt of swore but the comments you made Klinsmannic were rude and offensive.
Here is something a scally would never do which is show remorse, therefore you are not a scally.
I never criticised you personally and those that you list were not directly at you but at the club i.e. "pile of s***e or spurs" - not a personal insult. ''f*******l...'' - was said to emphasis a point you made that i disagreed with. ''...b******s that you talk about'' - another disagreement with a point you made (therefore not personal to you directly).
There wasn't any need for the expleteives, therefore it can only be perceived negatively. By definition expleteives are meant to cause offense.
''i wont respond for a personal attack on you because i consider myself to be much better than some c*** who makes a mockery of someone and yet again makes false and hurtful accusations'' i said some c*** and so wasnt aiming it directly at you.
I'll break it down for you. You have stated numerous times (excluding this paragraph) that you felt I aimed false and hurtful/offensive accusations at you. You were engaged in an argument with me. There are only two people in this argument. If I was the only one that i'nsulted' you and threw 'false accusations' at you, then I am unequivocally the 'some C***' you are referring to. You're trying to worm your way out of it but it's impossible. The only thing your sentence could be interpreted as is: ''Klinsmannic is a C*** because he insulted me, but I won't attack him because I'm better than that''
''i can call you a c*** though if you'd prefer to be known as a c***'' a false accusation made against me and i said that if you would like to be known as one then i would call you one (i.e. its your choice!)
What false accusation, this is an internet forum so everything you post is recorded. Anyone with half a brain cell (you're pretty smart because you tried to find a way of covering yourself by using the word 'some') can read that you called me a C***.
So theres what you said about me, theres the help that you required. I am biased but we all are to some degree when it comes to the football club we support. END OF
You're the one that started this whole thing. I praised Zokora, didn't even say he was complete, and you came out with some bile about joining Arsenal which irritated other people apart from me. In future, if you make a point, back it up. Read mine and Economists discussion about Rosicky from post number 164. Thats how it's done. Also please don't swear, it shows you up. I can't stop you from posting obviously, but if you remain as biased as you admit you are, I'll have to ignore the points you make outside of the Arsenal thread.