The Student Room Group

Why do so many girls hate foreskins?

Having read circumcision threads on here, I notice a great deal of girls preferring circumcised - why???? I simply can't understand what is so nice about a dried up mushroom-esque looking member. I've only ever sexually interacted with natural ones and loved the pliability and the fact that it varies in appearance during sex as opposed to just a boring stick. Would you have a labiaplasty to impress men?
And If it's purely down to hygeine then that's just pathetic.

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1

I agree, to me it's not natural and I admit I would be put off by a circumcised penis.

Reply 2

Original post by Botticello
Having read circumcision threads on here, I notice a great deal of girls preferring circumcised - why???? I simply can't understand what is so nice about a dried up mushroom-esque looking member. I've only ever sexually interacted with natural ones and loved the pliability and the fact that it varies in appearance during sex as opposed to just a boring stick. Would you have a labiaplasty to impress men?
And If it's purely down to hygeine then that's just pathetic.


OP comes back to his thread, no replies. No worries, anon on...

Original post by Anonymous
I agree, to me it's not natural and I admit I would be put off by a circumcised penis.

Reply 3

Original post by Koenz
OP comes back to his thread, no replies. No worries, anon on...


Eh? I'm a girl.

Reply 4

Luckily i'm circumcised and teh ladies love it.

Reply 5

I didn't even know most girls 'hated' them :/ don't see why, aren't most guys natural anyway?

Reply 6

Haha @ the guys hating on normal.

UMAD that we have greater sensations, more moist and generally more natural penis.


Oh yes, you can roll your foreskin back and taa daa, visually the same.

Reply 7

natural is nicest :sexface:

Reply 8

I've had the discussion with a few friends (mostly girls) and they said they didnt like the look of un-cut, but I doubt they've seen un-cut while erect, cos it looks basically the same. I haven't talked to my girlfriend about it, but she doesn't seem to have any complaints:colone:

Reply 9

Having experience with both, aesthetically i prefer cut. I mean, if you've got the goods, why hide it with extra skin?

Reply 10

They both look the same when erect, but a flaccid foreskin is pretty ugly. I have never met a girl who had a preference. After all, its what you do with it

Reply 11

Original post by Anonymous
I agree, to me it's not natural and I admit I would be put off by a circumcised penis.


Why? :lolwut: The foreskin gets pulled down for sex anyway thus creating that appearance of a circumcision anyway ...

Personally I don't see what's attractive about a flappy bit of skin covering the end ...

Reply 12

Never heard of this.

Reply 13

I PREFER foreskins.

Penises without look strange to me, and they are certainly more difficult to work with.

I don't know, I just find the foreskin on a flaccid penis really cute and enjoy playing with it - circumcised ones look odd and there is no extra skin to play with!

I've had boyfriends who were both, and have a distinct preference for natural. I recently started seeing a new guy, and I was a bit worried in case he was circumcised, but he turned out not to be - and I told him how glad I felt that he wasn't.

Reply 14

Original post by Botticello
Having read circumcision threads on here, I notice a great deal of girls preferring circumcised - why???? I simply can't understand what is so nice about a dried up mushroom-esque looking member. I've only ever sexually interacted with natural ones and loved the pliability and the fact that it varies in appearance during sex as opposed to just a boring stick. Would you have a labiaplasty to impress men?
And If it's purely down to hygeine then that's just pathetic.


So only penes with foreskins vary in appearance?! :lolwut:

Interesting.

And I'd imagine girls prefer whatever they are most used to.

Oh, and I don't think any man gets circumcised for cosmetic purposes, which is the more common reason for labiaplasty. Bad analogy.
(edited 13 years ago)

Reply 15

Original post by Anonymous
Why? :lolwut: The foreskin gets pulled down for sex anyway thus creating that appearance of a circumcision anyway ...

Personally I don't see what's attractive about a flappy bit of skin covering the end ...


That is what I keep telling the chicks but none of them wanna get cut for me. I just don't get it. Why wouldn't someone want to slice off part of their genitalia so it looks nicer to other people? It seems like such a normal thing, slicing off bits of one's own genitalia.

Reply 16

I don't have a physical preference but if I was a guy I don't think I'd like to be circumcised. I certainly wouldn't get a labiaplasty because my boyfriend preferred it that way.

Reply 17

Ive certainly never heard of circumcision for cosmetic reasons, and labiaplasty isn't comparable. Usually that is for health reasons or because they're ridiculously insecure

Reply 18

Men are usually circumcised either as a young child due to religious reasons or because their foreskin causes them discomfort, or so it seems to me. It's largely the same with labiaplasty. I've never heard of a man getting it done purely for cosmetic purposes.

Everybody has preferences, different men like different breast sizes and shapes, for example. Some people just prefer it one way or the other, I doubt many women force their partners to undergo circumcision.

Reply 19

Original post by Philbert
Men are usually circumcised either as a young child due to religious reasons or because their foreskin causes them discomfort, or so it seems to me. It's largely the same with labiaplasty. I've never heard of a man getting it done purely for cosmetic purposes.

Everybody has preferences, different men like different breast sizes and shapes, for example. Some people just prefer it one way or the other, I doubt many women force their partners to undergo circumcision.


What do you mean the same with labiaplasty?