The Student Room Group

People who kill Transgender people to get longer sentences...

Scroll to see replies

Reply 40
Original post by Rant
Delusions DO exist though, and are present in many mental illnesses. Delusions can be defined as "false beliefs about oneself or others" - e.g, someone might believe themselves to be the Pope.


But a person that believes they are the Pope does not then understand that they are actually a man from Luton.

However, a transsexual person isn't deluded. They understand they are in a males body and they wish to change to a female, which is possible. They are not holding a false belief.
Reply 41
Original post by Rant
Delusions DO exist though, and are present in many mental illnesses. Delusions can be defined as "false beliefs about oneself or others" - e.g, someone might believe themselves to be the Pope.


Yeah, and that's why you have to be thoroughly assessed by a psychiatrist before any sort of treatment (hormones, surgery, etc). Also, before surgery and hormones and things, you have to live as the sex which you are transitioning to. It's not nearly as easy as walking into your GP and saying "Hey, you know what I fancy doing today?"
Reply 42
Original post by lightburns
They have not isolated a cause for transgenderism yet. It's all possible. Making your opinion to be that there is not a fixed gender that isn't dependent on sex is pure prejudice without evidence to back it up. Yes, transgendered people do jump on their favoured explanation too quickly (as there is not the evidence to solidly say their side either). At least their biased opinions aren't hurting anyone though.


Male and female have biological proof as to why they have those genders, they either have 2 X chromosomes or a X and Y chromosome, or in some cases XXX, but thats non-disjunction. Transgenderism will have either one of two, the rest is due to hormone differences.
Original post by Rgman27
But a person that believes they are the Pope does not then understand that they are actually a man from Luton.

However, a transsexual person isn't deluded. They understand they are in a males body and they wish to change to a female, which is possible. They are not holding a false belief.


The thing is that a deluded person isn't going to know that they are deluded. It is perfectly possible that someone could be deluded over whether they are male or female.

I think ZZ9 puts forward a much better way of looking at it - transgendered people have to undergo a ridiculously long process to check if they have any other issues. When someone is pronounced totally and 100% sane, but they also say they are male/female when their body suggests otherwise, and this happens thousands of time, you begin to wonder if there is a brain condition or something that defines people as male or female. Meaning that they are not deluded.
Reply 44
Original post by Rgman27
But a person that believes they are the Pope does not then understand that they are actually a man from Luton.

However, a transsexual person isn't deluded. They understand they are in a males body and they wish to change to a female, which is possible. They are not holding a false belief.


They don't typically hold a constant delusion. I've known schizophrenics; they're lucid a lot of the time. At other times they believe things to be true that are definitely not.
Reply 45
Original post by ZZ9
Yeah, and that's why you have to be thoroughly assessed by a psychiatrist before any sort of treatment (hormones, surgery, etc). Also, before surgery and hormones and things, you have to live as the sex which you are transitioning to. It's not nearly as easy as walking into your GP and saying "Hey, you know what I fancy doing today?"


If doctors are told "you can't call someone ill if they believe they're a woman/man because that would be politically incorrect" then surely they'll pass them as sane despite their own judgement?
Original post by AbuAK
Male and female have biological proof as to why they have those genders, they either have 2 X chromosomes or a X and Y chromosome, or in some cases XXX, but thats non-disjunction. Transgenderism will have either one of two, the rest is due to hormone differences.


There are a huge huge range of conditions with crazy chromosomes, hormones and/or genitals. Whatever you define 'male' or 'female' as, there will ALWAYS be an exception. You seem to be basing sex on chromosomes. Here is your exception.

Is it so inconceivable that there is a part of the brain which labels you as male or female, and gives you certain expectations of how you fit into the world (causing distress when are treated as the opposite sex)?

I am hoping that this is the case.. I'd really like gender identity to be defined back into sex. Chromosomes denote sex, but they do not define it. You have a wide range of sexual characteristics that normally all match up. Gender identity might just be the sexual characteristic in the brain. I have no evidence. I am not saying this is true. I'm saying it's a possibility, and I'd like it to be true.
Original post by AbuAK
I'm not hating, I have my opinions you have yours. Changing your gender will not fix the problem, that will make it so that you won't be accepted in society, you will neither be that or this, while you may be more accepting, the majority will not be and I am sorry, but if they were born a male, I will consider them a male for the rest of their life. But you do what you wanna do.


Sure, opnions are fine - we're all entitled to them, I enjoy the discussion! I'm not arguing, just trying to show my perspective.

I just think that opinions are only worth something if the person who holds them is actually informed about what they're discussing and the majority of people who want to have their say about what they think of transgender and/or transsexual people have done very little research and don't know what they're talking about (most people who sit talking about it with their mates in work/college - whatever).

You say ''Changing your gender won't fix the problem'' - which problem? Do you mean the dysphoria, because actually it's the only way currently known by medical professionals to fix the problem. No amount of therapy can fix it long term. So it will help the individual to lead a happier life in most cases where the patient has gone through the proper psychologist evaluations and gender therapy and real life experience period.

With regards to you comment that 'you won't be accepted by society' well neither were many types of people until quite recently. But they didn't just give up fighting for their rights, they carried on. Just because transgender people aren't widely accepted in 2011 does not mean that it will always be the case - societies change. People realise their misunderstandings. Also, concerning your coments that you will always consider someone 'born male' as male - I assume you mean physcially male (penis) well what I'd say is that you ought to consider that there are so many variations one the scale between 'Male' and 'Female' (think about biological males with feminine dress sense and vice vera etc).
But society in general just glosses over that - everything is pink for girls and blue for boys.

Either a lot of people are completely ignorant of the fact that you can be born with male DNA and actually have a female body (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0002163/) and that people can have both male and female genitalia at birth - or they know about such conditions but want to pretend that they don't exist so they can keep everything in their own heads in a nice neat binary fashion of Male and Female - blue and pink.

I want to ask them: What about intersex people? What about people with Klinefelter's Syndrome? Turner Syndrome? Transgender people? Transexual people? Gender neutral people? AIS? The list could go on for pages. Honestly, Google it, it'll blow your noodle.

Your physical body doesn't define your gender - since you could have both male and female secondary sex attributes or lose your genitalia in an accident (http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/tvradio/programmes/horizon/dr_money_prog_summary.shtml - Very insightful story) or have the DNA of the opposite sex. You know your gender in your mind. A cis gendered male would still know his gender in his mind - he would still identify as MALE even if his penis was severed. It's not like knowing that Paris is the Capital of France - it's not that sort of knowledge. It's knowledge of a FEELING.

Try explaining this to your typical comment poster on Daily Mail article about a transexual - all you see is complete misunderstanding and ill informed demands that the NHS should not spend tax payers money on funding gender transition/therapy. Most of those people who don't recieve treatment would rather be dead - literally. I suppose a lot of people would prefer that though - it completely elliminates the issue of trying to understand transgender people if they don't exist doesn't it?

Gender is not black and white - there is a massive grey area in between the 'male' and 'female' points on the scale. A lot of people don't seem to understand this or want to accept it.

I say all this only with only the aim to educate and generate understanding - not to preach! If one person understands it a little better through what I've posted then that is a success. :smile:
Totally not in favour. Against the disabled ruling because of what it might mean for assisted suicide etc. Against the trans thing because 1: transsexualism is a mental illness and as such the ruling should be applied to all mentally ill and 2: it's just more positive discrimination it makes them different and special.
Reply 49
The article says that murders "motivated by hostility" to a transgender person will mean a longer sentence, not just because a transgender person was the victim, I think the title is a misleading tbh. Murders 'motivated by hostility' (aka hate crimes) do currently increase a minimum tariff when the hostility is towards other types of people (e.g. black people) so it makes sense to include transgender people.

What the law is effectively saying is that although murder is murder and always wrong, there are types of murder which are worse. These 'hate crimes' involve a person thinking they hate, for example, black people and so going out and killing one. They don't care who they kill, the victim is just an 'object' with no real meaning assigned to them or their life by the murderer. This is worse than a person who kills a specific person, even if their 'reason' is not justifiable (e.g. a man who kills his wife because of her cheating, not justifiable but here there is some form of 'reason' against a specific person, not a general hatred for no reason against an entire group of people seen as 'objects'). The general view is that the 'hate crime' person is more dangerous, and more likely to go on killing many more people.
Original post by Rant
If doctors are told "you can't call someone ill if they believe they're a woman/man because that would be politically incorrect" then surely they'll pass them as sane despite their own judgement?


The question is whether there are a whole load of other things going on.

Likely not deluded:
Indicators of gender identity disorder in early life (wearing other gender's clothes, engaging in behaviour typical of other gender, naming self with a name typical of other gender).
Consistent perception of self as the gender opposite to their sex.
No mental disorders or other strange things believed.
No trauma or such that could push them into a delusion.

Greater likelihood of delusion:
No indicators of gender identity disorder in early life.
Changing perception of self ("today I'm a girl! no no, yesterday was wrong, I'm a boy. No! I was wrong before, I actually am a girl 100%!")
Other mental disorders, confirmed delusions of other things.
Trauma e.g. mother passed away and must look after young siblings, take on role of mother inc. gender.
_____________________

This was a quick example just off the top of my head. All I'm trying to illustrate is that they look at the rest of your life, and see if there are signs of sanity or not. A large number of people who fit the former model suggest to me that transgenderism is not a delusion.
Reply 51
Original post by lightburns
The question is whether there are a whole load of other things going on.

Likely not deluded:
Indicators of gender identity disorder in early life (wearing other gender's clothes, engaging in behaviour typical of other gender, naming self with a name typical of other gender).
Consistent perception of self as the gender opposite to their sex.
No mental disorders or other strange things believed.
No trauma or such that could push them into a delusion.

Greater likelihood of delusion:
No indicators of gender identity disorder in early life.
Changing perception of self ("today I'm a girl! no no, yesterday was wrong, I'm a boy. No! I was wrong before, I actually am a girl 100%!")
Other mental disorders, confirmed delusions of other things.
Trauma e.g. mother passed away and must look after young siblings, take on role of mother inc. gender.
_____________________

This was a quick example just off the top of my head. All I'm trying to illustrate is that they look at the rest of your life, and see if there are signs of sanity or not. A large number of people who fit the former model suggest to me that transgenderism is not a delusion.


Yeah, I know. But a lot of that could be down to upbringing - I've heard stories of, say, a boy growing up in a female-only environment whose mother dressed him as a girl from an early age growing up to believe he was a girl in a boy's body.
Original post by lightburns
I don't get how it changes the meaning of what the guy said before. It's late maybe I've misunderstood him :P


I'll explain :smile:

He implied that people choose to be transgender. Here's why that is wrong (and he accepted that it is wrong):

Generally, and broadly:

Transgender is feeling that your are the opposite gender to the one that you were assigned at birth. For example, a person born 'female' who feels that they are male. It is a feeling/belief. Therefore they do not choose it. It's like saying someone 'chooses' to feel something like sadness or joy - or whatever. We don't choose our feelings - we only choose how we cope with them...

Which leads us to Transsexuals. Transsexuals are people who feel transgendered - they feel the wrong gender. The difference is that they choose to do something about it - e.g. wear different clothes than the ones typically worn by people of their birth gender, take hormones to affect their body and give them traits of the gender they feel they are, have surgeries to change their body to suit the gender they feel they are.

So do you see, one can be transgender but not transsexual. But if one is transsexual one is transgender.

Hope that's cleared it up for you :smile:
Original post by Rant
Yeah, I know. But a lot of that could be down to upbringing - I've heard stories of, say, a boy growing up in a female-only environment whose mother dressed him as a girl from an early age growing up to believe he was a girl in a boy's body.


Yep, that's something that would put the individual in the dodgy second model.

Transgendered people I've talked to, which is a fair few, weren't brought up like that. That will be a rare occurrence. It's far more likely for parents to push them into the standard, so female with a penis will not be allowed to wear dresses. Completely pushed the opposite direction.
Reply 54
Original post by lightburns
Yep, that's something that would put the individual in the dodgy second model.

Transgendered people I've talked to, which is a fair few, weren't brought up like that. That will be a rare occurrence. It's far more likely for parents to push them into the standard, so female with a penis will not be allowed to wear dresses. Completely pushed the opposite direction.


"A female with a penis"... see, for me, a girl will always be a girl, and a boy a boy. If they want to call themselves a boy/girl/whatever, that's up to them, but I would never see them as anything but a boy pretending to be a girl, or vice versa.
Original post by somethingbeautiful
I'll explain :smile:

He implied that people choose to be transgender. Here's why that is wrong (and he accepted that it is wrong):

Generally, and broadly:

Transgender is feeling that your are the opposite gender to the one that you were assigned at birth. For example, a person born 'female' who feels that they are male. It is a feeling/belief. Therefore they do not choose it. It's like saying someone 'chooses' to feel something like sadness or joy - or whatever. We don't choose our feelings - we only choose how we cope with them...

Which leads us to Transsexuals. Transsexuals are people who feel transgendered - they feel the wrong gender. The difference is that they choose to do something about it - e.g. wear different clothes than the ones typically worn by people of their birth gender, take hormones to affect their body and give them traits of the gender they feel they are, have surgeries to change their body to suit the gender they feel they are.

So do you see, one can be transgender but not transsexual. But if one is transsexual one is transgender.

Hope that's cleared it up for you :smile:


Sorry, there's a large amount of misunderstanding going on here. I completely misunderstood the poster, and posted a dumb comment that made me look like I didn't know the difference between transgendered and transsexual :P

I'm sure there's be half a billion people reading this thread who don't know the difference, so I'm sure your efforts haven't been wasted...
Original post by Rant
"A female with a penis"... see, for me, a girl will always be a girl, and a boy a boy. If they want to call themselves a boy/girl/whatever, that's up to them, but I would never see them as anything but a boy pretending to be a girl, or vice versa.


Do you agree that there are people who exist who have sexual characteristics of both sexes (e.g. someone who has all male characteristics, but also breasts, or someone who has genitals in between, or someone who has XX chromosomes but male characteristics)?

If yes: How do you define who is a male or a female? Or is there a grey area of 'I don't know' or 'there is no clear sex'?
Is it giving their lives more value?
Reply 58
Original post by lightburns
Do you agree that there are people who exist who have sexual characteristics of both sexes (e.g. someone who has all male characteristics, but also breasts, or someone who has genitals in between, or someone who has XX chromosomes but male characteristics)?

If yes: How do you define who is a male or a female? Or is there a grey area of 'I don't know' or 'there is no clear sex'?


There may be people born with extra bits, although I don't know of any cases... it's bound to have happened at some point. However, there's also people born with two heads.
Original post by Rant
There may be people born with extra bits, although I don't know of any cases... it's bound to have happened at some point. However, there's also people born with two heads.


0.1-0.2% of births are ambiguous enough to get specialist medical attention, according to wikipedia. A bit higher up on that page is a list of syndromes. It's more common than you'd think.

So, the next part of that question. How would you decide who is a he and who is a she?

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending