The Guardian Newspaper does it again...tut tut

Considering The Guardian has a reputation for good high quality journalism, whether or not you agree with its political standing, to call it immature child-like journalism is quite a strong comment when there are papers like The Sun and The Daily Mail in existence.
Also, it's just a bit of fun, I laughed at some of the comments personally. You should be able to take the piss once in a while without it being labeled as 'exploitation'.

submit funny captions to it.

I really like babies, but I don't think I could eat this one so soon after breakfast.

Don't worry, son, you can trust me. I'll never let the press intrude into your privacy.

Say that then instead of trying to sound posh by using technical words that made you sound like a gash!

Like most politicians Tony Blair prefers, understandably, to keep his family out of the limelight.

Unusually he has broken with this in order to donate a Father & Baby photograph to the Royal Academy of Arts New Art Exhibition. Every donated item will be sold to raise funds for the Royal Academy Schools. It is a beautiful photograph of the former prime minister with his newborn son Leo in 2000. Many, if not most of us can identify with it.








Now take a look at The Guardian's website:









Apparently exploitation of a photograph like this of our former Prime minister and his new born son is fair game amongst the ultra lefties?

Immature, child-like journalism.

Apparently, you've never been to Iraq or Afghanistan, but probably should head over there to see what Blair's handiwork looks like close up.

How did those places look beforehand, though?

Apparently, you've never been to Iraq or Afghanistan, but probably should head over there to see what Blair's handiwork looks like close up.

Is the baby on the floor??!! :O

Sunny, with no chance of Western missiles reducing hospitals to rubble.

I know that Iraq no longer has an extremely dangerous tyrant in control of some of the richest oil reserves in the world.

I know that Osama Bin Laden and Al Quaeda declared war on the West and have been getting slaughtered on their home turf ever since.

So you're saying that those areas were better off before the West got involved...?

Good grief. You're worryingly right wing, aren't you?

In place of a tyrant you have... a puppet tyrant owned by the West. So you think that the West should go into any country with oil reserves and secure them? Slaughter the people in the process?

As for Osama Bin Laden... wasn't he found in Pakistan? Would you suggest reducing that country to rubble too?