Both sets have been mentioned above at different points and I've also been PM'd by a number of you regarding what ivs are like. In the interests of fairness then, I've decided to simply put them out here. A lot of this might be out of date. Be aware that chambers change their approach year on year. Its just a rough outline of what I have experienced in the past.
2 Bedford Row
Panel: 3 people, all juniors for both rounds
Approach:
At first round you are given an exercise 10 minutes before you go in (a debate topic) you have to prepare 2 points for and 2 against which is to be delivered in front of the panel within EXACTLY 2 minutes. Few very brief follow up questions about you eg. What are your interests? Duration is about 5-7 minutes. They have explained that you have to make a LASTING IMPACT in those 5 minutes. First round they interview more than 80, second is 15 or less. Last year it was a question on whether Bin Laden should have faced trial and if so, where. I was also asked the "describe yourself in a word" question.
At second round you are given an application (plea in mitigation or bail application) to prepare a few days before. After the application, there maybe some follow up questions on your approach. They then have some set questions which they will ask every candidate – What do you think of x legal issue, what do you want to achieve out of pupillage etc.
Overall: Extremely friendly panel. Very good at putting you at ease – they want to see you at your best and the atmosphere is conducive to that.
187 Fleet Street
.
Panel: At first round they interview a fair few and have several different panels going on at the same time. Mine was a 3 person panel of juniors. Second round was more like 10 – 12, with a silk or two to boot.
Approach:
First round: Multiple ethical problems given for you to consider during the interview and how you would respond. Why crime, why us, why you – spent a fair bit of time on this. They will normally ask a slightly different question to end with, eg “IF you could be one character from a film who would it be and why”
Second round: Presented with a list of debate topics (some legal, some to do with current affairs, some just plainly odd) ten minutes before interview. 7 minutes uninterrupted to present – though in my experience they stop and start you. Very detailed analysis of your form and questions based around that.
They have a very set criteria they are judging by for both rounds, an extract from the feedback is below:
Each form is read and marked by
three members of Chambers. Each member scores the application out of 10,
making a maximum of 30 points.
We offered 68 first round interviews. The mark for an interview was 22
out of 30.
At interview, the panel makes its assessment on the following criteria (which are marked out of ten)
Presentation
Articulation
Confidence
Content
General
The mark for a second round was 40
Overall: My impression was that at second round they were very aggressive. You need to read their profiles very carefully and be ready to answer any questions coming from the form.