Guns more dangerous or nuclear weapns???

Well, I consider nuclear weapons more dangerous in that they are typically deployed without the victims having any idea until vaporization. However, with guns, the shooter is typically within sight, so most people will at least have the possibility of fleeing.

It is not a very fair question in my opinion. However, I have voted for Guns. The reasons being:

1) Both have the ability to kill people
2) Guns present a greater risk than nukes in everyday life

Also hasn't there only been one occasion when a nuke has been used on a country? I also can't see a nuke ever being used again.

Of course people have, just from quite a long distance from where the blast actually occurred.