David Cameron: "The time has come for gay couples to marry"

Well i haven't really been alive for 25 years :P.
Gay people don't feel the need to use condoms so they are slightly more likely to get AIDS.

I'm currently studying A2 biology and from what i understand the main purpose of Species is to reproduce or else they die out.
Gay people cannot reproduce so people who say it's genetics are WRONG.
It's their choice if they want to be gay, I think they should be allowed to get married but the NHS shouldn't fund them (They will most likely catch AIDS).
Then again i do believe that NHS shouldn't fund fat people either :P

This sounds super silly but I'm all teary eyed and happy about it. I know we're past all of the really bad homophobia and I've never had to experience it but I never thought that I'd be able to get married. Even when I was a tiny little kid I knew that a woman doesn't marry a woman. And now I know that I will probably be able to. I never even entertained the idea of me getting married ever and now I'm daydreaming about rainbow coloured cake and stuff.

'I support gay marriage because I am a Conservative' -LMAO one of the most contradictory clown statements I've ever seen hahahaha

Well i haven't really been alive for 25 years :P.
Gay people don't feel the need to use condoms so they are slightly more likely to get AIDS.

I'm going to play Devil's advocate here. Gay marriage is just another step in the long decline of Western marriage. Let us have a look at how marriage has fared over the years:

http://www.divorcerate.org/divorce-rates-in-uk.html

The increase in divorce rates almost exactly follows feminism's rise to power in our culture. Whether this is due to men refusing to man up or female hypergamy is unimportant. The main point is that with a large shift in our culture against marrying and settling down comes severe consequences: people are becoming more and more depressed and birth rates in the West are falling scarily far behind our foreign friends'.

Now why is it a problem that Westerners are not reproducing as much? Because we cannot rely on immigrants to uphold our values of freedom. Many come to the West specifically looking for a better life and end up in ghettos of their own people. Within these ghettos we see the same sort of savagery that was present in their old country and is their reason for escaping. Why do we let this happen? Because not only are we in the West self hating and criticizing our culture in favour of "multiculturalism" but also because Westerners (yes, mostly Caucasians) are becoming a minority in our own countries. With minority status comes powerlessness and an inability to defend the values and freedoms that were given to us by the sacrifice of our predecessors.

The main purpose of marriage outside of religious reasons is procreation, pure and simple (and redistribution of sex). Marriage is a social contract between a man and a woman which says that both have commitment to each other "til death do us part", financial and emotion. Not only this, but they have a commitment to any children they bring into this world by giving them the best possibly upbringing they can.

We have strayed far from this. Divorces rate have skyrocketed. Children of single moms tend to become losers in life. Divorces can wreck a child emotionally and yet we stand idly by and let this happen.

So in conclusion for gay marriages: are we not further diluting the concept of marriage? Isn't it already buried deep enough that we should be digging it out instead of pouring more sand on it? We already have seen how straying from the purest concept of marriage has disastrous implications for society. Can we afford to wreck ourselves further?

When are they going to legalise incest?

I'm currently studying A2 biology and from what i understand the main purpose of Species is to reproduce or else they die out.
Gay people cannot reproduce so people who say it's genetics are WRONG.
It's their choice if they want to be gay, I think they should be allowed to get married but the NHS shouldn't fund them (They will most likely catch AIDS).
Then again i do believe that NHS shouldn't fund fat people either :P

Well i haven't really been alive for 25 years :P.
Gay people don't feel the need to use condoms so they are slightly more likely to get AIDS.

Yes, because the two are clearly the same thing.



Homosexuality =/= infertility
Homosexuality =/= a choice
Homosexuality =/= a higher likelihood of catching AIDS. In 2010, the majority of new diagnoses of HIV/AIDS in Great Britain were among heterosexual men (while being a lesbian, I actually have a lower chance than you of catching it)

I'm currently studying A2 biology and from what i understand the main purpose of Species is to reproduce or else they die out.
Gay people cannot reproduce so people who say it's genetics are WRONG.
It's their choice if they want to be gay, I think they should be allowed to get married but the NHS shouldn't fund them (They will most likely catch AIDS).
Then again i do believe that NHS shouldn't fund fat people either :P

rational vote maximising

Disappointing to say the least.

If by granting gays marriage rights increases their willingness to "come out", then I can see nothing good or progressive in this. I fear that the social pressure will inevitably increase, and the statistics for depression and suicides will also be higher.

For a mere title, it was/is not worth it.

erm no there not...

Well i haven't really been alive for 25 years :P.
Gay people don't feel the need to use condoms so they are slightly more likely to get AIDS.

Perhaps if he concentrated more on the economy and less on homos, we wouldn't be in this economic mess. Needs to get his priorities straight!

'I support gay marriage because I am a Conservative' -LMAO one of the most contradictory clown statements I've ever seen hahahaha

If you're referring to the first sentence of my post, I was being sarcastic as incest and homosexuality are clearly not the same thing.

Ah yes, because Mr Cameron never stops campaigning for LGBTQ rights. Get a grip.