Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    So here is what MS says:

    d block: (Ni ‘d’ is highest energy sub-shell/orbital

    But I thought 4s has has the highest energy!

    Someone shed some light on this plss

    also I dunno the difference between subshell and orbital and shell!

    if there is any good website I could read about it -pls link me up


    +rep
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    4s fills before 3d, so it must be lower in energy

    Shell = distinguished by principle quantum number n (the big numbers in 1s2, 3d5)

    subshell = the s, p, d, f subshells you are familiar with

    orbital = holds 2 electrons of opposite spin

    So shell > subsell > orbital
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by EierVonSatan)


    subshell = the s, p, d, f subshells you are familiar with

    orbital = holds 2 electrons of opposite spin

    So shell > subsell > orbital
    +rep
    you changed your avatar..only just noticed!

    Here is another definition off MS:
    Transition element: has an ion with an
    incomplete/partially-filled d sub-shell/orbital

    it looks as though sub-shell and orbital are the same thing! that's why I got confused

    So maybe I ask this question: is it like 5 orbitals in d sub-shell and then the number of e inside those orbitals can be between 2,3,4,...,9 (so not 1 and 10 and therefore incomplete if you see what I mean)


    Shell = distinguished by principle quantum number n (the big numbers in 1s2, 3d5)
    So just to clarify: if we look at 4s2

    4 is the quantom number
    s is the subshell
    and s contains one orbital with 2 e

    4s fills before 3d, so it must be lower in energy
    Oo I see why I was confused now! I was thinking 4s lose electrons first so must be the highest energy sub-shell
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by arvin_infinity)
    +rep
    you changed your avatar..only just noticed!
    I'm often changing it. I get bored easy

    Here is another definition off MS:
    Transition element: has an ion with an
    incomplete/partially-filled d sub-shell/orbital

    it looks as though sub-shell and orbital are the same thing! that's why I got confused
    If you have an unfilled d-orbital then you must also have an unfilled d-subshell since orbitals make up the subshell

    So maybe I ask this question: is it like 5 orbitals in d sub-shell and then the number of e inside those orbitals can be between 2,3,4,...,9 (so not 1 and 10 and therefore incomplete if you see what I mean)
    It can be 1 but not 10, because 10 is filled and 0 is unfilled. 1-9 is partially filled :yes:

    So just to clarify: if we look at 4s2

    4 is the quantom number
    s is the subshell
    and s contains one orbital with 2 e
    :yy:

    Oo I see why I was confused now! I was thinking 4s lose electrons first so must be the highest energy sub-shell
    It's bit involved but yes, electrons fill the 4s first but are also lost first when forming ions.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by EierVonSatan)
    If you have an unfilled d-orbital then you must also have an unfilled d-subshell since orbitals make up the subshell



    :yes:



    :yy:


    I'm often changing it. I get bored easy
    I feel like changing mine too..but just can't be bothered to wait for uploading the pages and ..
    It's bit involved but yes, electrons fill the 4s first but are also lost first when forming ions.
    Is it right thinking e configuration is actually in an ascending order of energy
    1s,2s,2p,3s,3..4s,3d,4p-d-f

    It can be 1 but not 10, because 10 is filled and 0 is unfilled. 1-9 is partially filled
    yh my bad I was meant to say 1-9
    But back to my question is this right thinking those "boxes" with opposites spin are the orbitals! so e.g. d sub-shell has 5 orbitals?!
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by arvin_infinity)
    Is it right thinking e configuration is actually in an ascending order of energy
    1s,2s,2p,3s,3..4s,3d,4p-d-f
    You won't be asked about any element heavier than Kr. So you don't have to worry about f orbitals since things get messy and the relative energies are not so easy to determine.

    yh my bad I was meant to say 1-9
    But back to my question is this right thinking those "boxes" with opposites spin are the orbitals! so e.g. d sub-shell has 5 orbitals?!
    Yep, the boxes with arrows going up and down are representations of orbitals.

    s subshell = 1 orbital
    p subshell = 3 orbitals
    d subshell = 5 orbitals
    f subshell = 7 orbitals
    and so on...
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Would you rather give up salt or pepper?
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Write a reply...
    Reply
    Hide
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.