Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    My question is that when you have by parts with limits, the how do you lay it out ? I can't find examples of this anywhere in my textbooks. Because we set up an intermediary form which has another integral in it, what limits does that have ?

    Which one of the following is the proper way of laying this out, feel free to post the proper way if it is none of the following.

    \displaystyle \int^a_b (1)\times \ln x\ dx

\

\Rightarrow x\ln x - \int^a_b 1\ dx

\

\Rightarrow \left[ x\ln \ - x \right]_b^a


    Or

    \displaystyle \int^a_b (1)\times \ln x\ dx

\

\Rightarrow \left[x\ln x - \int 1\ dx \right]_b^a



\

\Rightarrow \left[ x\ln \ - x \right]_b^a

    Or

    \displaystyle \int^a_b (1)\times \ln x\ dx



\

\Rightarrow \left[x\ln x - \int^a_b 1\ dx \right]_b^a

\



\Rightarrow \left[ x\ln \ - x \right]_b^a

    Thnx
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by member910132)
    My question is that when you have by parts with limits, the how do you lay it out ? I can't find examples of this anywhere in my textbooks. Because we set up an intermediary form which has another integral in it, what limits does that have ?

    Which one of the following is the proper way of laying this out, feel free to post the proper way if it is none of the following.

    \displaystyle \int^a_b (1)\times \ln x\ dx

\

\Rightarrow x\ln x - \int^a_b 1\ dx

\

\Rightarrow \left[ x\ln x \ - x \right]_b^a


    Or

    \displaystyle \int^a_b (1)\times \ln x\ dx

\

\Rightarrow \left[x\ln x - \int 1\ dx \right]_b^a



\

\Rightarrow \left[ x\ln \ - x \right]_b^a

    Or

    \displaystyle \int^a_b (1)\times \ln x\ dx



\

\Rightarrow \left[x\ln x - \int^a_b 1\ dx \right]_b^a

\



\Rightarrow \left[ x\ln \ - x \right]_b^a

    Thnx
    To my mind:
    \displaystyle \int^a_b (1)\times \ln x\ dx

\

\Rightarrow \left[x\ln x]_b^a - \int^a_b 1\ dx \right

\Rightarrow \left[ x\ln x \ - x \right]_b^a
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by member910132)
    My question is that when you have by parts with limits, the how do you lay it out ? I can't find examples of this anywhere in my textbooks. Because we set up an intermediary form which has another integral in it, what limits does that have ?

    Which one of the following is the proper way of laying this out, feel free to post the proper way if it is none of the following.

    \displaystyle \int^a_b (1)\times \ln x\ dx

\

\Rightarrow x\ln x - \int^a_b 1\ dx

\

\Rightarrow \left[ x\ln \ - x \right]_b^a


    Or

    \displaystyle \int^a_b (1)\times \ln x\ dx

\

\Rightarrow \left[x\ln x - \int 1\ dx \right]_b^a



\

\Rightarrow \left[ x\ln \ - x \right]_b^a

    Or

    \displaystyle \int^a_b (1)\times \ln x\ dx



\

\Rightarrow \left[x\ln x - \int^a_b 1\ dx \right]_b^a

\



\Rightarrow \left[ x\ln \ - x \right]_b^a

    Thnx
    The one that makes the most sense is the first one but they're pretty easy with letting you off on this kind of thing. Except for personally; I'd write it as

     [xln x]^a_b - \int^a_b 1 dx

    And I think that's the 'most correct' way of doing the first step.

    Also those implies signs are used incorrectly. You aren't implying anything - you just need a regular equals sign.


    EDIT: You've also missed the 'x' in 'lnx' a lot
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by hassi94)
    The one that makes the most sense is the first one but they're pretty easy with letting you off on this kind of thing. Except for personally; I'd write it as

     [xln x]^a_b - \int^a_b 1 dx

    And I think that's the 'most correct' way of doing the first step.

    Also those implies signs are used incorrectly. You aren't implying anything - you just need a regular equals sign.


    EDIT: You've also missed the 'x' in 'lnx' a lot
    Even in STEP are they easy about that ?

    They are \Rightarrows, but yea "=" should be used.

    I just missed 1 "x" in ln x, the rest was a copy paste job lol
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by member910132)
    Even in STEP are they easy about that ?

    They are \Rightarrows, but yea "=" should be used.

    I just missed 1 "x" in ln x, the rest was a copy paste job lol
    \Rightarrow is an implication.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    Int by parts is probably my least favourite topic in A level maths.

    Just can't work my head around it. :confused:
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Slumpy)
    To my mind:
    \displaystyle \int^a_b (1)\times \ln x\ dx

\

\Rightarrow \left[x\ln x]_b^a - \int^a_b 1\ dx \right

\Rightarrow \left[ x\ln x \ - x \right]_b^a

    (Original post by hassi94)
    The one that makes the most sense is the first one but they're pretty easy with letting you off on this kind of thing. Except for personally; I'd write it as

     [xln x]^a_b - \int^a_b 1 dx

    And I think that's the 'most correct' way of doing the first step.

    Also those implies signs are used incorrectly. You aren't implying anything - you just need a regular equals sign.


    EDIT: You've also missed the 'x' in 'lnx' a lot
    So you guys are saying that

     \displaystyle \left[F(x) \right]_b^a - \left[G(x) \right]_b^a = \left[F(x) - G(x)  \right]_b^a ?
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by tamimi)
    Int by parts is probably my least favourite topic in A level maths.

    Just can't work my head around it. :confused:
    In this case the Q is actually  \int \ln x\ dx but we put the 1 in there to make it easier. u=ln x v'= 1 and proceed from there.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by member910132)
    So you guys are saying that

     \displaystyle \left[F(x) \right]_b^a - \left[G(x) \right]_b^a = \left[F(x) - G(x)  \right]_b^a ?
    Yes that is true. Think about it;

     \displaystyle \left[F(x) \right]_b^a = F(a) - F(b) and \left[G(x) \right]_b^a = G(a) - G(b)

    so

     \displaystyle \left[F(x) \right]_b^a - \left[G(x) \right]_b^a = [F(a) - F(b)] - [G(a) - G(b)]

    = [F(a) - G(a)] - [F(b) - G(b)] = \left[F(x) - G(x)  \right]_b^a
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by member910132)
    Even in STEP are they easy about that ?

    They are \Rightarrows, but yea "=" should be used.

    I just missed 1 "x" in ln x, the rest was a copy paste job lol
    Also yes from what I understand even in STEP they are fairly indifferent about it. Especially with subsitutions - sometimes it's not worth changing the limits of your integral (and just changing the results back to the original variable and subbing the original limits in is easier) so they don't mind if you have limits - stop having limits then have them again As long as you don't completely lose them for whatever reason.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by member910132)
    So you guys are saying that

     \displaystyle \left[F(x) \right]_b^a - \left[G(x) \right]_b^a = \left[F(x) - G(x)  \right]_b^a ?
    Yeah. Tbh, I'd have left it as [xlnx]-[x], but I was in a rush in the morning and couldn't be bothered with paying attention to the latex:p:
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Would you rather give up salt or pepper?
    Useful resources

    Make your revision easier

    Maths

    Maths Forum posting guidelines

    Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

    Equations

    How to use LaTex

    Writing equations the easy way

    Student revising

    Study habits of A* students

    Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

    Study Planner

    Create your own Study Planner

    Never miss a deadline again

    Polling station sign

    Thinking about a maths degree?

    Chat with other maths applicants

    Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

    Groups associated with this forum:

    View associated groups
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Write a reply...
    Reply
    Hide
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.