Why is the bond angle in BrF3, 86 degrees?

Announcements Posted on
TSR looking different to you this week? Find out why here. 02-12-2016
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    The shape is: trigonal bypyramidal, with 5 pairs of electrons in the outer shell. I dont understand why the bond angle changes, should'nt the angles remain the same ( 90 and 120 ) because there is an electron above and below? :confused: (sorry cant really explain)

    Kinda look like this: Name:  geometria-brf3.gif
Views: 6435
Size:  7.1 KB ( the one i drew was (a) )
    Attached Images
     
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    You'd expect 90o if there were 5 bonding pairs, but the lone pairs repel each other more, pushing the bonds closer together
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by EierVonSatan)
    You'd expect 90o if there were 5 bonding pairs, but the lone pairs repel each other more, pushing the bonds closer together
    yes, but there are 2 lone pairs above and below, so they are repelling the same amount right?, so the question is why isnt it 90?
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Seatbelt)
    yes, but there are 2 lone pairs above and below, so they are repelling the same amount right?, so the question is why isnt it 90?
    Sorry, I didn't realise you had edited your post. The two lone pairs aren't above and below the BrF3 plane as in (a). A molecule with 3 bonding pairs and 2 lone pairs adopts a T-shape (c).
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Sorry to hijack this post but could it also be drawn as having two lone pairs at the top and then the T-shape as a normal T-shape so to speak as opposed to it being on its side. I never understand this part of mark schemes - I get the structure right but never facing the right way if that makes sense?
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by MediterraneanX)
    Sorry to hijack this post but could it also be drawn as having two lone pairs at the top and then the T-shape as a normal T-shape so to speak as opposed to it being on its side. I never understand this part of mark schemes - I get the structure right but never facing the right way if that makes sense?
    Yes, that's fine. It doesn't matter how you draw it - in the same way you can draw a square on it's side or standing on one of it's corners. It's still the same square
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by EierVonSatan)
    Yes, that's fine. It doesn't matter how you draw it - in the same way you can draw a square on it's side or standing on one of it's corners. It's still the same square
    Ah thanks for that - I just wasn't sure as usually in the textbooks and revision books they tend to put the lone pair at the top but in mark schemes they tend to rotate the shapes around.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    I still dont understand :/, what do you mean T-shape?
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Seatbelt)
    I still dont understand :/, what do you mean T-shape?
    The molecule is in the shape of a T

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-shape...cular_geometry
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    My question is why was this included in the Jan 2012 module when no one covered this structure. To be honest it's still wasn't clear to me, until I actually looked at it indepth, how it was made up! http://sixthsense.osfc.ac.uk/chemist...g/covalent.asp

    Helpful site for anyone else confused.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    is this expanding the octet?
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by bloomingblossoms)
    is this expanding the octet?
    Indeed :yes:
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    Angles aren't perfect 120 and 90 etc as in VSEPR theory lone pairs take up 'more space' than bonding pairs. This can be rationalised by considering that lone pairs are localised on the central atom whereas bonding pairs are shared between the atoms. As the lone pairs are localised they are 'nearer' the central atom and have more influence upon the shape.
    Axial positions (up and down) are more favorable to place large atoms than equatorial positions as the steric interactions are smaller than in the equatorial positions.
 
 
 
Write a reply… Reply
Submit reply

Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
  1. this can't be left blank
    that username has been taken, please choose another Forgotten your password?
  2. this can't be left blank
    this email is already registered. Forgotten your password?
  3. this can't be left blank

    6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

  4. this can't be left empty
    your full birthday is required
  1. Oops, you need to agree to our Ts&Cs to register
  2. Slide to join now Processing…

Updated: May 14, 2012
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Today on TSR
Poll
How are you feeling about doing A-levels?
Study resources

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Quick reply
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.