Back
to top
Psychology PY2 WJEC Watch
Announcements
Page 1 of 1
Go to first unread
Skip to page:
Hey guys! I've got a psychology exam on tuesday and i know nothing.. can someone help on which is the best and quickest way to revise, i have some knowledge but that's a bout it! Also what do you guys think will come up and what were the past questions for the py2 wjec jan 2012 paper? xxx
0
reply
Report
#2
What I've done is find model answers for each of the essays and used them to create my own. ( We had a crap teacher so I've hardly got any notes, paha )
Though seeing as it's in 2 days, I think you should just go over the basics for each study and whatnot.
I also hope Gardner Procedures comes up.. or Rosenhan.. something to do with them. If Rahe comes up I will cry, haha.
Though seeing as it's in 2 days, I think you should just go over the basics for each study and whatnot.
I also hope Gardner Procedures comes up.. or Rosenhan.. something to do with them. If Rahe comes up I will cry, haha.
0
reply
Report
#4
i did this last year
what i did was some quick mindmaps outlining the most important information. and once your in the exam you can just expand on those points. trust me you know much more than you think you do
PY4 is double of PY2. stresss you'll be fine though, rahe is the worst one :/ never got it lol
what i did was some quick mindmaps outlining the most important information. and once your in the exam you can just expand on those points. trust me you know much more than you think you do
PY4 is double of PY2. stresss you'll be fine though, rahe is the worst one :/ never got it lol
0
reply
Report
#5
does anyone have any ideas what studys will come up in the exam, from looking at past papers or whatever, its so much to learn, fed up of writing essays 
0
reply
Report
#6
You have no way to second guess this board, and my teacher has said that emphatically. You just have to learn it ALL. And the more you know, the better you will do
0
reply
Report
#7
Is anyone else finding the alternative evidence absolutely impossible to remember: I only know it for Gardner & Milgram
0
reply
Report
#8
Don't second guess anything, learn all the studies. Alternative evidence is awkward but don't waste time learning the names of researchers, as long as you have the basics of what they did and whether they support or contradict the results of the study is all that matters.
0
reply
Report
#9
(Original post by madders94)
Don't second guess anything, learn all the studies. Alternative evidence is awkward but don't waste time learning the names of researchers, as long as you have the basics of what they did and whether they support or contradict the results of the study is all that matters.
Don't second guess anything, learn all the studies. Alternative evidence is awkward but don't waste time learning the names of researchers, as long as you have the basics of what they did and whether they support or contradict the results of the study is all that matters.
That might help? Good luck to everyone :P
0
reply
Report
#10
Jan 12
Aims - Bennet
Procedure - Rosenhan
Findings - Loftus
Evaluate - Gibson
Evaulate - Buss
Alternative research - Asch
Hope it helps.
Aims - Bennet
Procedure - Rosenhan
Findings - Loftus
Evaluate - Gibson
Evaulate - Buss
Alternative research - Asch
Hope it helps.
0
reply
Report
#11
My prediction from looking at the past papers is that the possible quesions that could come up for section B for the methodology is; Rosenhan, gardner and gardner or Milgram, as these have not come up at all. I am not sure about section A, as anything would come up but my guess is that Gibson and walk and langar and rodin will come up.
0
reply
X
Page 1 of 1
Go to first unread
Skip to page:
Quick Reply
