You are Here: Home >< Maths

# Exact value of arctan[1+sqrt(2)]

1. Hi,

I was doing an integration question, which required use of substitution. I took a substitution which made the working very long.

Now i have no idea how to convert into an exact value in terms of

Though wolfram is able to do this, it gives,

I have tried the easier substitution and got the right answer, but i just want to know how can i make this more difficult approach work.

2. If you substitute wolframalpha's result into your equation you get the right answer.

I don't think there is a direct way to prove this value of arctan. You can always try entering it into a calculator and dividing by pi..
3. (Original post by yclicc)
If you substitute wolframalpha's result into your equation you get the right answer.

I don't think there is a direct way to prove this value of arctan. You can always try entering it into a calculator and dividing by pi..

I know wolframalpha's result gives the right answer, but how does wolfram calculates it?

For artanh we have a formula, is there a similar formula for arctan, any idea?
4. Unless you happen to know the tan function very well, I don't think there's an 'easy' way of doing it.

If you're allowed a calculator then it's a simple matter of checking against different multiples of pi really.
5. No, as tanh(x) is defined as ((e^2x)-1)/((e^2x)+1) which is arranged to make x the subject, giving a formula for artanh(x). This is not the case with tan(x)/arctan(x), although they may be approximated to a polynomial by Maclaurin/taylor series, which is how a computer can calculate values of tan(x)/arctan(x)
6. (Original post by marcusmerehay)
Unless you happen to know the tan function very well, I don't think there's an 'easy' way of doing it.

If you're allowed a calculator then it's a simple matter of checking against different multiples of pi really.
Ok, thanks.

I was thinking that there might be a formula for it.

I just did
7. The + hints at using some kind of half-angle formula (it's not like to be a double-angle formula because they normally give fractions, for tan at least).

You can write where . Using the formula , we have

We don't know any tan~cot angles that give , so it looks like we should use the sin~cosec for that. We're done if we can find such that and . (And we can.)
8. You can derive all by making use of and .
9. (Original post by raheem94)
ok, thanks.

I was thinking that there might be a formula for it.

I just did
ooh! Nice one!
10. (Original post by raheem94)
Hi,

I was doing an integration question, which required use of substitution. I took a substitution which made the working very long.

Now i have no idea how to convert into an exact value in terms of

Though wolfram is able to do this, it gives,

I have tried the easier substitution and got the right answer, but i just want to know how can i make this more difficult approach work.

Whilst replies from Nuodai and Jacques etc. are great - surely your calculator should be able to give you an exact answer (assuming this is a-level)? Which is obviously a lot easier in an exam situation.
11. (Original post by nuodai)
The + hints at using some kind of half-angle formula (it's not like to be a double-angle formula because they normally give fractions, for tan at least).

You can write where . Using the formula , we have

We don't know any tan~cot angles that give , so it looks like we should use the sin~cosec for that. We're done if we can find such that and . (And we can.)

You are a genius!

You can derive all by making use of and .

I am not quite sure how i will apply your method to my question and will it take long time?

(Original post by Hasufel)
ooh! Nice one!

(Original post by hassi94)
Whilst replies from Nuodai and Jacques etc. are great - surely your calculator should be able to give you an exact answer (assuming this is a-level)? Which is obviously a lot easier in an exam situation.
I did one way above which gave the answer in terms of , but can the calculator directly find the answer in terms of
Though i hope to avoid such stupid mistakes in exam, the question could have been done very much quickly had i taken a different substitution but the substitution i took required too much working and at the end there was the arctan case...
12. (Original post by raheem94)
I am not quite sure how i will apply your method to my question and will it take long time?
In fact all you need is the first identity. If you rearrange

then, using the quadratic formula, you get

If we write (for ), then we must have and so we take the + sign, and the above equation gives

which is quite nice.
13. (Original post by raheem94)

You are a genius!

I am not quite sure how i will apply your method to my question and will it take long time?

I did one way above which gave the answer in terms of , but can the calculator directly find the answer in terms of
Though i hope to avoid such stupid mistakes in exam, the question could have been done very much quickly had i taken a different substitution but the substitution i took required too much working and at the end there was the arctan case...
The newer casio calculators can give it directly in terms of pi. I don't know if they know this one though...
14. (Original post by yclicc)
The newer casio calculators can give it directly in terms of pi. I don't know if they know this one though...
I have fx-991ES, can this one give answers in terms of pi?
15. (Original post by raheem94)
I have fx-991ES, can this one give answers in terms of pi?
Yes - it does by default, doesn't it?
16. (Original post by raheem94)
I have fx-991ES, can this one give answers in terms of pi?
Yep this should give answers in terms of pi by default. Make sure you're not in Stat mode.
17. If it doesn't, just use radians and divide your answer by Pi and stick pi on the end of it. Or use degrees and convert yourself.

What exam board are you? As I do edexcel and I don't know about the tanh stuff .
18. (Original post by JonathanM)
If it doesn't, just use radians and divide your answer by Pi and stick pi on the end of it. Or use degrees and convert yourself.
(Original post by hassi94)
Yep this should give answers in terms of pi by default. Make sure you're not in Stat mode.
(Original post by nuodai)
Yes - it does by default, doesn't it?
Oh yes, it does it.

I never use the calc on Mthlo mode, i always prefer LineIO, i just set it into the other and it gave the answer in terms of pi.

Regarding the stat mode, i never use it, i did the stats exam but i never tried to take some time to learn how to use the stats mode
19. (Original post by JonathanM)
If it doesn't, just use radians and divide your answer by Pi and stick pi on the end of it. Or use degrees and convert yourself.

What exam board are you? As I do edexcel and I don't know about the tanh stuff .
I also do edexcel, but this stuff is in FP3.
20. (Original post by raheem94)
Oh yes, it does it.

I never use the calc on Mthlo mode, i always prefer LineIO, i just set it into the other and it gave the answer in terms of pi.

Regarding the stat mode, i never use it, i did the stats exam but i never tried to take some time to learn how to use the stats mode
Not going to lie, I'm a budding mathematician and a tech fanatic but I have no idea what the modes on a calculator are whatsoever

## Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
1. this can't be left blank
2. this can't be left blank
3. this can't be left blank

6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

4. this can't be left empty
1. Oops, you need to agree to our Ts&Cs to register

Updated: May 31, 2012
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Today on TSR

What do you wish you'd been taught?

Poll
Useful resources

### Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

### How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

### Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams