Double standard for ugly men and attractive men?

OP how many "ugly" men have you seen with good looking women, and how any "ugly" women have you seen with god looking men?

There are loads of couples where one is deemed to be slightly better looking than the other.

But, back to the main point, how is this relevant? I'm not talking about relationships, I'm talking about brief interactions between strangers. Generally, people that stare at each other don't go on to have sex and have a relationship.

You seem very obsessed with looks the men in the thread about footballers weren't that hard on the eyes. There is a lot more to life than how people look. On the lothario/creep point Eddie Cibrian used to be my ultimate crush but because of him cheating throughout the whole of his last marriage he is no longer "the most perfect looking man" to me. Wayne Rooney has cheated on his wife many times. I don't think either of these men are "creeps" but I wouldn't want to be in a relationship with either of them.

A man that would be considered to be a creep/pervert amongst my group of friends is a man that will not leave someone alone once they have refused his advances. There are attractive men who do this.

When a guy approaches me or i strike up a conversation with someone "ugly" i don't think this guy must be a creep/pervert. There's actually a guy who i think is really cute(he has a gf) because i know him, but my friends don't see it. All my friends have had crushes like this. If this was every woman's first thought "ugly" men wouldn't be in relationships,because most women don't date perverts/creeps.

I think this is to be expected in your case, like attracts like. You seem to very harsh with looks, and i assume you go for the most attractive women first. I hope that I answered every question in your OP using personal experience.

Probably just to be expected...

If you were a chick would you want an ugly man in a trenchcoat having a 'perv' over you?

Or would you prefer to have a nice fantasy about a good looking guy?

Can guess most ladies response

I think you're missing the point, he's basically saying that an unattractive guy and handsome guy could come up to you and say the same things but you would most likely be flattered/find the handsome guy charming as he's good looking but wouldn't take the ugly guy seriously or take offence that he tried chatting you up. You somehow assumed this Eddie guy was amazing cos he's a good looking guy when he isn't amazing and sounds like a bit of a scum

No, I responded to all the points in the OP. I think you are misunderstanding what i said.
1. I wouldn't be offended if an "ugly" man approached me. I and all of my friends have all had crushes on men that only they understand, they usually have girlfriends anyway.

2. I never assumed Eddie was an amazing guy.I said that I thought he was the most perfect looking man, since learning about his personal life I don't; this is not because he is any less attractive. I am demonstrating how a man's character can make him very unattractive in some women's eyes. ie. That personality is important for women.(I didn't know anything about his family life until it was in the news.Men have plenty of "pin ups" whom they know nothing about).

Summary: All my friends have had crushes on "ugly" men with good character/personalities and described them as hot. Personality is very important, for me it doesn't matter if you are the best looking guy if your a **** I will not go there.

If an ugly man is flirtatious, or explicitly expresses any interest in any female, he is almost immediately labelled as a "pervert"/"creep".

If an attractive man is flirtatious, or even adulterous, he is considered to be a "ladies' man"/"player"/"lothario" - all of which have significantly more positive connotations than "perv".

Both types of people are effectively the same, and yet people, mostly unknowingly, treat them significantly differently - even people who claim that they don't "judge a book by its cover" are more likely to call an ugly man a "pervert" before they do the same to an attractive man.

Is this sad? Or to be expected - as it's natural to judge ugly people more harshly?

Its the same with women. If a hot girl sleeps around, people think she is a femme fatale/liberated modern female. If an ugly girl sleeps around people think she is a filfy slaag.

If an ugly man is flirtatious, or explicitly expresses any interest in any female, he is almost immediately labelled as a "pervert"/"creep".

If an attractive man is flirtatious, or even adulterous, he is considered to be a "ladies' man"/"player"/"lothario" - all of which have significantly more positive connotations than "perv".

Both types of people are effectively the same, and yet people, mostly unknowingly, treat them significantly differently - even people who claim that they don't "judge a book by its cover" are more likely to call an ugly man a "pervert" before they do the same to an attractive man.

Is this sad? Or to be expected - as it's natural to judge ugly people more harshly?

If an ugly man is flirtatious, or explicitly expresses any interest in any female, he is almost immediately labelled as a "pervert"/"creep".

If an attractive man is flirtatious, or even adulterous, he is considered to be a "ladies' man"/"player"/"lothario" - all of which have significantly more positive connotations than "perv".

Both types of people are effectively the same, and yet people, mostly unknowingly, treat them significantly differently - even people who claim that they don't "judge a book by its cover" are more likely to call an ugly man a "pervert" before they do the same to an attractive man.

Is this sad? Or to be expected - as it's natural to judge ugly people more harshly?

If an ugly man is flirtatious, or explicitly expresses any interest in any female, he is almost immediately labelled as a "pervert"/"creep".

If an attractive man is flirtatious, or even adulterous, he is considered to be a "ladies' man"/"player"/"lothario" - all of which have significantly more positive connotations than "perv".

Both types of people are effectively the same, and yet people, mostly unknowingly, treat them significantly differently - even people who claim that they don't "judge a book by its cover" are more likely to call an ugly man a "pervert" before they do the same to an attractive man.

Is this sad? Or to be expected - as it's natural to judge ugly people more harshly?