This discussion is now closed.
Check out other Related discussions
- Number crunching: excess of aspirant barristers over places available.
- Law
- Law
- Which a-levels should I pick for Law?
- Barrister apprenticeships
- What is it like to be a medical negligence barrister
- Cooperate law
- have a 2 . 2 in LLB. can i still become a barrister if i do well in LLM?
- Can i still become a solictior or barrister with these grades?
- How to best select my Year 2 law modules
- Realistic Chances of Solicitor or Barrister - Legal Journey.
- considering a career in international law over commercial law, any tips?
- law degree - help - about law degree
- Career
- Alevels resit or uni?
- I’m confused where to go
- Do I have enough law experience to make direct TC applications worthwhile?
- Getting work experience at The Middle Temple but aiming for Commercial law
- Call to the Bar and pupillage
- Law Conversion after non-Law degrees
The notion that barristers are 'above' solicitors
Budding solicitors - what do you think about this (in my opinion: common) social attitude?
I'm someone considering doing the GDL and have spoken about legal careers with a few laymen. The common response appears to be the view that barristers are somehow hierarchically superior to solicitors or at least part of a more prestigious profession.
Now, I know that this view is not necessarily true. Barristers have higher rights of audience compared to solicitors (but not solicitor-advocates), but as far as I am aware - they are not superior. In fact, don't solicitors choose what work to give and not to give to chambers? So neither is necessarily 'above' the other?
What do you think about this social view?
I'm someone considering doing the GDL and have spoken about legal careers with a few laymen. The common response appears to be the view that barristers are somehow hierarchically superior to solicitors or at least part of a more prestigious profession.
Now, I know that this view is not necessarily true. Barristers have higher rights of audience compared to solicitors (but not solicitor-advocates), but as far as I am aware - they are not superior. In fact, don't solicitors choose what work to give and not to give to chambers? So neither is necessarily 'above' the other?
What do you think about this social view?
Scroll to see replies
Reply 2
Original post by RobertWhite
Probably because becoming a barrister is harder and they typically earn more money. It's probably a bit like doctors and nurses - yet both are vital and neither can work without the other
VERY extreme example if I may say so.
Reply 3
Original post by RobertWhite
Probably because becoming a barrister is harder and they typically earn more money. It's probably a bit like doctors and nurses - yet both are vital and neither can work without the other. I think you'll find this is pretty much the case with every profession.
Lol, comparing solicitors to nurses and barristers to doctors?
Original post by Tsunami2011
VERY extreme example if I may say so.
Yes, obviously. It was an example to show how both parts of the clock are needed for the whole to work. Why is this so difficult to understand? Of course the disparity between doctors and nurses and barristers and solicitors is huge.
Reply 6
Original post by RobertWhite
Does your IQ not enable you to grasp the concept of my example?
No, because my IQ cannot comprehend how someone can be so stupid enough to produce such an analogy.
Original post by Hopple
So you say solicitors just pick what cases go through, but barristers actually fight the cases. I think it's quite clear which one's more important...
I'm sure a barrister could do what a solicitor does, but not necessarily the other way round.
I'm sure a barrister could do what a solicitor does, but not necessarily the other way round.
And apparently this is different with doctors and nurses. Sigh...
Original post by Lord-Voldemort
No, because my IQ cannot comprehend how someone can be so stupid enough to produce such an analogy.
You seem rather insecure about becoming a solicitor. That's all I can think of to why you're so defensive about the analogy. Barristers are more highly trained than solicitors, earn more money and is deemed a harder job as a whole and to get into. You're going to need to get over that if you want to be a solicitor. Barristers are 'superior' in a sense yet you still play a vital role.
Original post by RobertWhite
You seem rather insecure about becoming a solicitor. That's all I can think of to why you're so defensive about the analogy. Barristers are more highly trained than solicitors, earn more money and is deemed a harder job as a whole and to get into. You're going to need to get over that if you want to be a solicitor. Barristers are 'superior' in a sense yet you still play a vital role.
... You what?
Original post by Blazara
... You what?
Are you really disputing top barristers earn the same or less than a solicitor?
Reply 13
Original post by RobertWhite
You seem rather insecure about becoming a solicitor. That's all I can think of to why you're so defensive about the analogy. Barristers are more highly trained than solicitors, earn more money and is deemed a harder job as a whole and to get into. You're going to need to get over that if you want to be a solicitor. Barristers are 'superior' in a sense yet you still play a vital role.
As clearly mentioned, I have yet to even embark on the GDL (if I even decide to do so), let alone decide if I wish to complete the LPC or the BPTC.
The reason why I am apparently 'defensive' is because the analogy was puerile and ill-conceived.
Give us an analogy with some credible substantiation as to why it is valid and you might get a less 'defensive' response.
Original post by RobertWhite
Are you really disputing top barristers earn the same or less than a solicitor?
Top barristers earn more than 'a' solicitor and a likely somewhat less than the 'top' solicitors.
Incidentally, holy ****! (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/south_yorkshire/6543223.stm)
(edited 12 years ago)
Original post by Norton1
Top barristers earn more than 'a' solicitor and a likely somewhat less than the 'top' solicitors.
Barristers at their height can exceed a million a year (the real top players), do solicitors really earn that much?
Original post by RobertWhite
Barristers at their height can exceed a million a year (the real top players), do solicitors really earn that much?
Well read the little article. I think some equity partners in some firms could approach a million, yes.
Then again Jonathan Sumption earned £1.6 million one year and I doubt many solicitors approach that.
(edited 12 years ago)
Original post by RobertWhite
Barristers at their height can exceed a million a year (the real top players), do solicitors really earn that much?
Only very few are going to be earning that. Barristers do not automatically become rich, especially in the beginning, while a trainee fresh out can be on £60k if at the right firm.
(edited 12 years ago)
Original post by Blazara
Only very few are going to be earning that. Barristers do not automatically become rich, especially in the beginning, while a trainee fresh out can be on £60k if at the right firm.
Mhm, solicitors earned more than I thought
Reply 19
I think a more adequate analogy would be a Consultant and a Staff Grade doctor - both have the same primary medical qualification; the Consultant earns more and generally has more responsibilities than a Staff Grade doctor.
Related discussions
- Number crunching: excess of aspirant barristers over places available.
- Law
- Law
- Which a-levels should I pick for Law?
- Barrister apprenticeships
- What is it like to be a medical negligence barrister
- Cooperate law
- have a 2 . 2 in LLB. can i still become a barrister if i do well in LLM?
- Can i still become a solictior or barrister with these grades?
- How to best select my Year 2 law modules
- Realistic Chances of Solicitor or Barrister - Legal Journey.
- considering a career in international law over commercial law, any tips?
- law degree - help - about law degree
- Career
- Alevels resit or uni?
- I’m confused where to go
- Do I have enough law experience to make direct TC applications worthwhile?
- Getting work experience at The Middle Temple but aiming for Commercial law
- Call to the Bar and pupillage
- Law Conversion after non-Law degrees
Latest
Trending
Last reply 1 day ago
CPS Pupillage/Legal Trainee Scheme (Oct 2026) Start!Last reply 2 months ago
Should I give up on my Solicitor Training Contract Search in favour of Teaching?Last reply 2 months ago
Will a non-law degree put me at a disadvantage when becoming a barrister?