I intend to take Film Studies A-level in September and I am just a bit curious as to why it is held in such a poor regard. The limited respectability of the subject isn't perturbing me as I know I will enjoy the subject and my UCAS application will not suffer greatly as I am taking two facilitating subjects (in the form of English Literature and History), and so don't view this thread as an attempt to make myself feel better.
Firstly, film is the art form of the 20th Century which illustrates the relevance of the subject, in my humble opinion. Nowadays, books and film can be seen as equal in the cultural and social significance they can offer.
Secondly, the approach to the subject is very similar to the approach required for the study of English Literature. Both subjects require critical analysis and the ability to deconstruct both micro and macro features. The only significant difference is quite obviously that one subject requires the study of novels/poetry whilst the other requires the study of films. Whilst there is more emphasis on linguistic analysis in English Literature, Film Studies requires the student to examine how features such as lighting, camera, sound, mise-en-scene etc. contribute meaning.
Film Studies also requires an understanding of the economics of film consumption. There is no such equivalent present in the study of English Literature (one never has to discuss or analyse the economics behind the publication of books).
With regards to examinations, both subjects require answers in the form of essays, usually involving 'to what extent...' style arguments. What is the difference in gain between someone studying books and the other studying films? (Making the assumption that both are performing to the same level)
As previously mentioned, it is not much of a pressing issue for me, I prioritise educational enjoyment over subject elitism, I am just curious as to what others think regarding the low respect for Film Studies.