Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
Turn on thread page Beta
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    I'm stuck between the relationship between Volume and the surface area.

    Ie V is proportional to an inverse function. But I forgot the inverse function. Any help?
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    Surely volume increases with surface area?

    Geometrists and topologists come help out! Wait, are topologists interested in this stuff...
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    Volume increses with surface area. But the relationships is like double the length = 4x the surface area = 8x the volume.

    And my brain is tired. and I think it is an inverse relationship
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    It will depend on the shape.
    Interestingly, the surface area of a sphere is equal to the derivative of the volume. But i dont think its true generally.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    So what about a general formula like x is proportional to xyz is that out of a question for the general shape?

    What about the simple cube? Whats the general formula for that?
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 2776)
    So what about a general formula like x is proportional to xyz is that out of a question for the general shape?

    What about the simple cube? Whats the general formula for that?
    Well you could add to the surface area without increasing the volume.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 2776)
    So what about a general formula like x is proportional to xyz is that out of a question for the general shape?

    What about the simple cube? Whats the general formula for that?
    Well, the volume increases by the linear scale factor cubed and the surface area by 6 * (linear scale factor squared), so if the volume is multiplied by some constant, n, then the linear scale factor is multiplied by n^(1/3) and, hence, the surfce area is multiplied by 6n^(2/3). That could be utter rubbish - check it first!

    Ben
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 2776)
    So what about a general formula like x is proportional to xyz is that out of a question for the general shape?

    What about the simple cube? Whats the general formula for that?
    If you deal with specific regular shapes, then yes, you can find a relationship. If the shape is irregular, there isnt a relationship. Consider a cube, but one face has a triangular indentation. By making that indentation larger, the surface area increases, but the volume decreases, but increasing the other lengths increases both volume and surface area. So there isnt a general rule.

    For a cube, V = sqrt(SurfaceArea/6)^3
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by JamesF)
    If you deal with specific regular shapes, then yes, you can find a relationship. If the shape is irregular, there isnt a relationship. Consider a cube, but one face has a triangular indentation. By making that indentation larger, the surface area increases, but the volume decreases, but increasing the other lengths increases both volume and surface area. So there isnt a general rule.

    For a cube, V = sqrt(SurfaceArea/6)^3
    Good, I haven't made a fool of myself!

    Ben
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Ben.S.)
    Well, the volume increases by the linear scale factor cubed and the surface area by 6 * (linear scale factor squared), so if the volume is multiplied by some constant, n, then the linear scale factor is multiplied by n^(1/3) and, hence, the surfce area is multiplied by 6n^(2/3). That could be utter rubbish - check it first!

    Ben
    Yea, I think thats right.
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 2776)
    Volume increses with surface area. But the relationships is like double the length = 4x the surface area = 8x the volume.

    And my brain is tired. and I think it is an inverse relationship
    do you mean (volume scale factor) = (length scale factor)³ = (area scale factor)^3/2?
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by JamesF)
    It will depend on the shape.
    Interestingly, the surface area of a sphere is equal to the derivative of the volume. But i dont think its true generally.
    is that a direct consequence of the divergence theorem?
 
 
 
Poll
“Yanny” or “Laurel”

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.