Am I intellectually inferior to those at Oxbridge?

I emphasise with your case; I also lack confidence. Congratulations on getting into Warwick University, that is a commendable achievement.

I can't forfeit a chance to study at such a prestigious establishment due to some syndrome I may have. I will perservere in improving my conversational skills, as I can be quite fluent when discussing my academic interests. I just hate small talk, it is such a waste of time. Also, my happiness is certainly not my priority; education and learning are all that matter to me.

No offence, but why are you so insecure about being "intellectually inferior" to Oxbridge students? There's loads of other great universities there, and tbh intelligence is really overrated - it means and translates to very little in the real world. People on TSR should really stop using their university and degree subject to define themselves so much.

I can't forfeit a chance to study at such a prestigious establishment due to some syndrome I may have. I will perservere in improving my conversational skills, as I can be quite fluent when discussing my academic interests. I just hate small talk, it is such a waste of time. Also, my happiness is certainly not my priority; education and learning are all that matter to me.

That's a little unfair. I have Asperger's Syndrome and don't fair well in conversations with people I am unfamiliar with. I hope I am not disadvantaged due to my neuroanatomy...

You probably aren't, I found with them a lot rode on what school you went to, where you lived and my parent's financial status -_-

Sent from The Student Room's Android App

Not necessarily. Obviously there's a higher chance than picking someone from the general population, but not a guarantee by any means. I interviewed for Oxford and was rejected. Now, that could be because I was going for the wrong subject (which I do genuinely believe played a part), didn't go to a private school (which I don't) or was academically inferior to my peers, but in actuality it was because I came across badly at interview. The ability to interview, certainly in my case, was linked to confidence, which I didn't have much of at the time so I got nervous and messed up. So if anything I think for me it probably shows that I should have gone for a different subject (having studied for a year, I now know this was the case) and lacked confidence compared to others.

Not having gone to a private school or even being shy wouldn't really have made much of a difference, tbh

No, but being so nervous about being in that situation that I screwed up my answers because I was stumbling over my words and getting confused would. I don't believe the private school bearing had much impact on my status (save for interview practice) as I stated in the post - I just had it there to illustrate I wasn't clutching at all the usual straws like a lot of Oxbridge rejects.

Even so, it's misleading to put that down to the school you go to. Being nervous crosses all class and schooling barriers! Not to mention that not all private schools provide such practice and many state schools do. In any case, the tutors can differentiate between those who are terribly nervous and have something to say, and those who are nervous and have nothing to say, and those who just simply have nothing to say It's not as clear-cut as you were making out