Jaffaholic
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 13 years ago
#1
I used Norton Utilities (speed disk) to defragment my hard drive. After doing this, i used the analyse function on the windows defrag software, and it claims the hard drive is 80% fragmented.

Which one is correct?
0
reply
Knogle
Badges: 14
Rep:
?
#2
Report 13 years ago
#2
I always found such defragmenting software dodgy. ^o)
0
reply
markkey
Badges: 8
Rep:
?
#3
Report 13 years ago
#3
Well windows and speed disk have different ways of sorting the hard drive out. Windows seems to put it with system files first and then the rest of the top line folders in alphabetical order and then the folders files in these in alphabetical order.

Speed disk on the other hand sorts the files so that the most used ones are at the beginning of the disk so that the heads have to travel as small a distance as possible so to speed things up.
0
reply
Axiom
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#4
Report 13 years ago
#4
Windows defragmenter is rubbish. Disregard what it says. Diskeeper 9 is the best defragmenter there is IMO.
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

How many uni open days have you been to/did you go to?

0 (100)
29.5%
1 (56)
16.52%
2 (46)
13.57%
3 (53)
15.63%
4 (25)
7.37%
5 (23)
6.78%
6 (9)
2.65%
7+ (27)
7.96%

Watched Threads

View All
Latest
My Feed