Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
x Turn on thread page Beta

Israel joining NATO? watch

Announcements
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    OK, it dosent look like they will in the immediate future, but to me this seems like a sensible move in light of the escalating tensions in the middle east. What are your opinions?

    From Wall Street Journal -
    http://online.wsj.com/public/article...f_main_tff_top
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    NATO should be reserved for countries of European origin. Israel is in the Middle East it is neither a stable nor responsible country, it flings out headlines such a "Nuclear Iran is a threat to the whole world" when Iran is only a threat to Israel. Very hot headed and Middle Eastern.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    I feel Israel has every right to join Nato - not that Nato really does much or is worth anything now.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    Why should it be based on geographic location? Surely geographic loction should not stop nations with similar international concerns from formaing a formal alliance.

    If Israel were to join NATO then it would be worth something more than it is now. It is a mutuall defence treaty, this would help ensure that the threat from Iran is properly kept under control. Iran wouldn't dare attack Israel if this meant attacking NATO.
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by OakBeans)
    NATO should be reserved for countries of European origin. Israel is in the Middle East.
    Israel is as much of European origin as the US and Canada...
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Bismarck)
    Israel is as much of European origin as the US and Canada...
    not really - the jews came to Europe and then left Europe but the US and Canadian people only left Europe so are still European.
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Amon.)
    not really - the jews came to Europe and then left Europe but the US and Canadian people only left Europe so are still European.
    And the "European" people came from Africa if you go back far enough. A vast majority of the people who founded the latest incarnation of Israel had European ancestry going back a thousand years.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Bismarck)
    And the "European" people came from Africa if you go back far enough.
    in ONE theory.
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Amon.)
    in ONE theory.
    In the theory that almost all non-Nazi experts agree with and that has far and away the most convincing logic and the most empirical support.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Bismarck)
    In the theory that almost all non-Nazi experts agree with and that has far and away the most convincing logic and the most empirical support.
    :rofl:

    you can't argue anything with out calling the other person:
    a) Adolf
    b) a neo-Nazi!


    if we did come from Africa that would still be much much longer ago than jews came to Europe.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Bismarck)
    Which would mean Canadians and Americans "came to Europe and then left Europe."
    if the theory were true (its not):

    Canadians and Americans came to Europe MILLIONS of years ago, did well in Europe, developed in Europe, created lots in Europe then went to do that somewhere else.

    jews came to Europe few HUNDRED years ago, and then left.

    The amount of time is totally different.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Bismarck)
    There were no human beings millions of years ago, genius. Amazing that you can claim that a theory is wrong without even knowing it.
    humans are 5 million years old.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    I don't see how all this has anything to do with membership in NATO
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Amon.)
    humans are 5 million years old.
    Closer to 200,000 years. Please get your nose out of your Nazi textbook and come back when you actually learn something.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Bismarck)
    Closer to 200,000 years. Please get your nose out of your Nazi textbook and come back when you actually learn something.
    More name calling?

    http://www.mnh.si.edu/anthro/humanor...faq/evolve.htm
    http://www.factmonster.com/ipka/A0932663.html (yes I know it says Africa :rolleyes: )


    cuth: sorry!
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    The evolution started millions of years ago. There were several intermediate species, with human beings being the most recent. The comment from last post still applies.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Bismarck)
    The evolution started millions of years ago. There were several intermediate species, with human beings being the most recent. The comment from last post still applies.
    lets say your right (possibly on years, not on Africa):

    Europeans have still been here a MUCH longer than jews.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Bismarck)
    So one stops being an "immigrant" once his family lives somewhere for 100,000 years? Why not 1 year or 1 million years?
    I already said why:

    Canadians and Americans came to Europe thousands of years ago, did well in Europe, developed in Europe, created lots in Europe then went to do that somewhere else.

    jews came to Europe few HUNDRED years ago, and then left.

    The amount of time is totally different, the amount that each type of people did is totally different.
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    Can we keep this debate focussed on the geo-politcal arguments. The race of the people living in Israel is totally irrelevent.

    Israel is a western democracy in a key strategic location in the Middle East. Furthermore it has demonstrated a willingness to help us out in the past when it would have been politically damaging for us to do anything. I'm thinking of course, about the well timed bombing of the Osirak nuclear reactor in Iraq.
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by gideon2000uk)
    Can we keep this debate focussed on the geo-politcal arguments. The race of the people living in Israel is totally irrelevent.

    Israel is a western democracy in a key strategic location in the Middle East. Furthermore it has demonstrated a willingness to help us out in the past when it would have been politically damaging for us to do anything. I'm thinking of course, about the well timed bombing of the Osirak nuclear reactor in Iraq.
    Their race or at least their location is relevant to quite a few Europeans. Do you honestly think there would even be a debate about this if Israel was in Europe?

    Not that I actually see a point of Israel joining a crumbling alliance most of whose members don't have the military strength to invade Malta. If it joins, it will be a purely political move.
 
 
 
Poll
Do you agree with the proposed ban on plastic straws and cotton buds?
Useful resources

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.