Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
x Turn on thread page Beta

China hosts first Buddhism forum watch

Announcements
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    13
    BBC - Buddhism forum begins in China

    Sri Lanka welcomes this new initiative by China, but is disappointed that the Dalai Lama was not invited. Surely a Buddhist forum has to include the faith's spiritual leader and\or his nominees? We would like to see greater religious freedom within China (in particular for the 100 million Buddhist followers there).
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    They had the pretender Patchen Lama or something, but Russia can see why China would not invite someone who is sworn to oppose their leadership
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Brazil hopes for greater religous freedom in China. Although as a Buddhist myself, I am pleased that the state had allowed the forum to take place. I also wish that the state would revert the stance and be more welcoming to the Dalai Lama
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    13
    (Original post by Jangliss)
    They had the pretender Patchen Lama or something, but Russia can see why China would not invite someone who is sworn to oppose their leadership
    The original deputy of the Dalai was replaced by a Chinese-appointed figure. It is not suprising that he did not receive much of a welcome at the forum.
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    i wasn't sure if the MUN wanted to hear about this but now its here

    China thinks this was an appropriate step towards Religious freedom, however as the Dalai Llama is seperatist from Mother China we did not feel his presence was appropriate. However although being officially atheist we hope to promote greater religious freedom.

    While we're here we'd also like to announce that roughly ten million Christians in China are celebrating Easter openly.

    EDIT: IT was the Buddhists at the forum who refused to acknoledge the Panchen Lama's presence.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by sr4470)
    The original deputy of the Dalai was replaced by a Chinese-appointed figure. It is not suprising that he did not receive much of a welcome at the forum.

    Brazil certainly isn't suprised that the Buddhist refused to acknowledge him.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Nightowl)
    i wasn't sure if the MUN wanted to hear about this but now its here

    China thinks this was an appropriate step towards Religious freedom, however as the Dalai Llama is seperatist from Mother China we did not feel his presence was appropriate. However although being officially atheist we hope to promote greater religious freedom.

    While we're here we'd also like to announce that roughly ten million Christians in China are celebrating Easter openly.
    Brazil is please to hear this and hopes that these words will be acted on.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Nightowl)
    i wasn't sure if the MUN wanted to hear about this but now its here
    India is sure that this should be up for discussion in the MUN, as it affects Buddhists the world across.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by sr4470)
    BBC - Buddhism forum begins in China

    Sri Lanka welcomes this new initiative by China, but is disappointed that the Dalai Lama was not invited. Surely a Buddhist forum has to include the faith's spiritual leader and\or his nominees? We would like to see greater religious freedom within China (in particular for the 100 million Buddhist followers there).
    Italy agrees with the sentiments expressed by Sri Lanka.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by brimstone)
    India is sure that this should be up for discussion in the MUN, as it affects Buddhists the world across.
    Religous oppression is definitly a topic for discussion
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    We're not oppressing anymore, thats the point of the forum being held.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Oh you know what I mean nit-picker
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    13
    (Original post by Nightowl)
    i wasn't sure if the MUN wanted to hear about this but now its here

    China thinks this was an appropriate step towards religious freedom, however as the Dalai Llama is seperatist from Mother China we did not feel his presence was appropriate. However although being officially atheist we hope to promote greater religious freedom.
    This is a sensitive topic given that the original homeland of some of our people was Nepal...nonetheless, Sri Lanka agrees progress has been made on this issue.

    (Original post by Nightowl)
    It was the Buddhists at the forum who refused to acknoledge the Panchen Lama's presence.
    A Chinese figure as the Panchen Lama would never go down well with our fellow Buddhists in China...perhaps this ought to be a consideration in future.

    (Original post by Dhesi)
    Italy agrees with the sentiments expressed by Sri Lanka.
    (Original post by UnaChance)
    Brazil is please to hear this and hopes that these words will be acted on.

    Sri Lanka thanks the delegates of Italy and Brazil for their support.
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    It is China's responsibility to choose the Panchen Lama, we do not believe it is fair to shun someone because he was not the Dalai Lama's candidate.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    13
    (Original post by Nightowl)
    It is China's responsibility to choose the Panchen Lama, we do not believe it is fair to shun someone because he was not the Dalai Lama's candidate.
    China is officially an atheist state, so what legitimacy is there for it to be appointing a Buddhist spiritual figure? Yes, the previous Panchen Lama has long disappeared, but the buddhists at the forum are not impressed by the need of a rubber stamped candidate.
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    China believes that it has equal legitimacy as Tibet is current part of the PRC.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    13
    (Original post by Nightowl)
    China believes that it has equal legitimacy as Tibet is currently part of the PRC.
    Sri Lanka would like to make it clear we continue to support the one China policy. However, this is a seperate issue from religious freedom and as such we do not wish to be involved in any petty border disputes with Nepal and the PRC.
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    China thanks Sri Lanka for it's support, and hopes other nations take a similar standpoint.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    India cannot comment on this issue at this moment in time, except to say that we advocate freedom of religion for all.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Nightowl)
    China thanks Serbia for it's support, and hopes other nations take a similar standpoint.
    Serbia :confused: surely Sri Lanka,
 
 
 
Poll
Do you agree with the proposed ban on plastic straws and cotton buds?
Useful resources

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.