The Student Room Group
Reply 1
Sentooran
First year physicians do more maths than first year mathematicians.
Sen


Surely you mean physicists? and i find that very hard to believe.
Reply 2
I was in the same position as you (choosing between Economics and Physics) and I ended up choosing Economics at Cambridge. I very highly doubt (in fact, am 100% sure) that I would have gotten into Cambridge to do Physics, so I dont know whether the statement that it is easier to get into Physics departments than Economics departments is valid.

If you want to go pursue postgraduate studies in the US especially after your degree, then I would highly recommend doing a Physics or Maths degree (Maths is better). If, however, you want to get a job right after, then do what you like. Having an undergrad degree in Physics isnt enough to get you a Quant job in banking, and wont make you stand out. Economics grads from the top universities (Oxbridge, LSE) go into banking by the bucket load - doing economics definitely hasnt hindered the career prospects of thousands of people each year, so it wont affect your job prospects either.
Reply 3
Sentooran
Yes, you're right, I do mean physicists (what a stupid error!). I know two people that study Maths and Physics at Imperial College London, both first-year and they're brothers. They've said to me that Physics is extremely maths based in the first year, more so than BSc Mathematics.

Sen

this is irrelavent, but those "two people" lied to you, the two courses maths and maths&physics are identical in the first year at imperial.:p:
Reply 4
freemyice
this is irrelavent, but those "two people" lied to you, the two courses maths and maths&physics are identical in the first year at imperial.:p:


Well thats irrelevant because Imperial don't do maths & physics. :p: I think he meant he know someone who does maths and another person that does physics.

I still don't agree there is more maths in a physics degree than a maths one though. The maths in the first few years of a physics degree is mostly applied maths whereas in the maths degree there is lots of pure maths as well as the applied stuff you would do in the physics degree.
Reply 5
Maya
I still don't agree there is more maths in a physics degree than a maths one though. The maths in the first few years of a physics degree is mostly applied maths whereas in the maths degree there is lots of pure maths as well as the applied stuff you would do in the physics degree.
Indeed. For a physicist, math is a tool as opposed to something to be studied for its own sake. The mathematician is concerned with proof and establishing the tools used by physicists and economists from first principles.

To the original poster, I'd study whatever you find most interesting. Both are solid degrees that'll stand you in good stead.
Reply 6
Maya
Well thats irrelevant because Imperial don't do maths & physics. :p: I think he meant he know someone who does maths and another person that does physics.

I still don't agree there is more maths in a physics degree than a maths one though. The maths in the first few years of a physics degree is mostly applied maths whereas in the maths degree there is lots of pure maths as well as the applied stuff you would do in the physics degree.


imperial does have maths&mathmatical physics
Reply 7
freemyice
imperial does have maths&mathmatical physics


I know that, it just has a strange name and you don't do practical, it was a joke :smile:
Reply 8
economics from ucl will make you get into ib
Reply 9
If I could do both, I'd go for physics.
Reply 10
I chose economics over plysics because i think that economics will give me an understanding on everyday issues political and social. Before i started my a levels, i was pretty certain i was going to do physics, and while it is very interesting, economics is just more practical.

They both are very highly respected degrees and therefore i would say that they are similar in terms of career prospects. However, physics is a possible route into sciences while economics isnt. Then again through economics you enter the political arena.

It really depends what you want to do, but for most professional jobs id say they are equal.
Reply 11
Sentooran
My personal opinion is Physics, then Economics, purely because as Synergetic said, they're in such great demand and they have ideal skills for finance. But note, this is my personal opinion. Synergetic rightly says that you would have a better of getting into a reputable university if you applied for Physics, because it is undersubscribed, and Economics is really oversubscrbed. But don't forget, Economics is an excellent degree to have for finance, and equally as good as Physics. I enjoy both and would do Physics at university, but it's very difficult. Hence, to do well in it you've got to be extremely good at Physics and work very hard. First year physicians do more maths than first year mathematicians. With either, you're going to have the right degree.

Hope this helps,

Sen



Highlighted texts 1 & 2 are surely a contradiction?

1st Year Physicsts do more maths than mathematicians? Mental.
Reply 12
physics will always be better as its the harder subject, the worlds greatest minds studied physics.

in terms of employment physics is looked at better and its always nice to be able to say i have a degree in physics or astrophysics try and imagine yourself as an employer or ask around try www.*********** for investment banking.

but in saying that the most important thing is that you get onto a degree that you will enjoy dont do physics because it will give you better job prospects if you dont enjoy it, as that will only make it twice as hard !!

ask careers advisor aswell
investor
physics will always be better as its the harder subject, the worlds greatest minds studied physics.

in terms of employment physics is looked at better and its always nice to be able to say i have a degree in physics or astrophysics try and imagine yourself as an employer or ask around try www.*********** for investment banking.

but in saying that the most important thing is that you get onto a degree that you will enjoy dont do physics because it will give you better job prospects if you dont enjoy it, as that will only make it twice as hard !!

ask careers advisor aswell


Agreed.

I would ranbk the subjects like this:

1.Medicine
2.Physics.
3.Law
4.Economics
5.Engineering

In Sweden however its quite different.

1.Medicine FAR SUPERIOR. Hardest course and hardest entry requirements by far.


2.Engineering at Chalmers or Royal institute of technology.
3.Law
4.Economics

Economics in Sweden is not a very respected degree. It's way behind a Law graduate in terms of job prospects, salaries etc. On average that is.
This is the sad thruth and is the reason why I am gonna study Economics in the UK.
atz
hi just wondering which degree is better for a career in finance etc..a physics degree or an economics degree? both at prestigious uni's of course..thanks:smile:


The one you are better at.

And that was the end of that discussion.
atz
hi just wondering which degree is better for a career in finance etc..a physics degree or an economics degree? both at prestigious uni's of course..thanks:smile:



As PB said, the one where you'll do better in. They're both great and widely respected by banks.
Reply 16
I don't really know what I want to do, I know that I enjoy physics, and I made a mistake of not doing a Further Maths A level and not choosing Economics. But is there any way I could study a course that combines Economics and Physics, without having an economics A level.
I do Pure Maths, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, and I'm going to do a German As, but not sure I'll get a good grade in the German. The rest I'm Pretty confident in. I think I'll get 4 A's.
Thank you, e-mail would be nice.
:smile: