Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free

times of israel: jews do control media Watch

    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by tehFrance)
    Rhadamanthus is anything but a racist, it is quite clear from your lack of original thought and being unable to refute what Rhadamanthus has said to you that you are rather stumped (especially as you called it a spittle flecked rant which is quite incorrect) and thus trying to find a way at tarnishing this brilliant young man. I shall stand up for my brother in arms and deny you the opportunity to slander him.

    You are at the very least anti-Semitic and you should be ashamed of yourself. Although I suppose it is to be expected when one cannot look past another's creed. Ciao goy.
    I agreed with you until you used the term "goy" and "anti-Semetic." Unfortunately, I find myself agreeing with Adileh now.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Rhadamanthus)
    The piece is irony, and not to mention wrong anyway. Perhaps this wasn't explained in your copy of Jew-Hating Conspiracy Nonsense for Dummies, but it's the case.

    And drop the "my boyfriend is Jewish" trope. That ****'s easier to sniff-out than the "some of my best friends are Jews" line.

    You say that if a Jew is successful then this is down to "ethnic networking and nepotism." That is a racist claim, and you are a quintessential anti-Semite. Jews control the media, they're all "in on" some kind of conspiracy to dominate the world. Just admit it, it's easier than coming up with these far-fetched theories. Just bloody say it, will you? You hate Jews.

    No doubt you'll try and avoid admitting this fact by trying to say you're fighting for human rights or freedom, thus using the language of the kind of oppression that you actually wholeheartedly support. Your hatred of Jews is rather thinly disguised.

    but the piece isn't irony. he is attempting irony only in the first section.

    so the question is why are you lying like this?
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Adileh)
    1: because racists like to protect their own no matter what the facts are. .
    (Original post by Adileh)
    Are you Jewish?
    I, like Mr tehFrance has said, am anything but a racist. In fact, I loathe racism. The only ones who are racists here are those presuming that because there are some Jews in some business that it entails Jewish control of the media and of the world. Whether I am Jewish or not is besides the point: my argument still stands.
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by lulubel)
    but the piece isn't irony. he is attempting irony only in the first section.
    The piece is stupid, and obviously written by someone who's not bothered about repercussions, but it's obviously irony.

    so the question is why are you lying like this?
    You assume that I must be lying? Why? What leads you to believe I am not telling the truth? Have you no valid responses to my argument?
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Savvy Sage)
    I agreed with you until you used the term "goy" and "anti-Semetic." Unfortunately, I find myself agreeing with Adileh now.
    That's a shame, because some people really are anti-Semites, and every time someone points this out that person is always told to shut up and stop calling people anti-Semites. It gets to the point when Jews cannot say that Nazis are anti-Semites in case those Jews are accused of trying to "shut up" said anti-Semite.
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    just put on Sky News then put something else like Al Jazeera, its very clear to see who controls the media.

    "If we are not careful the media will have us loving the ones who do the oppressing and hating the ones who get oppressed"
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Kutta)
    just put on Sky News then put something else like Al Jazeera, its very clear to see who controls the media.

    "If we are not careful the media will have us loving the ones who do the oppressing and hating the ones who get oppressed"
    Sky and AJ are both part of "the media", they both have radically different views on things, therefore it is logical to assume that no one person controls both and, thus, no one actually "controls the media" at all. Surely this is the case?
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Rhadamanthus)
    Sky and AJ are both part of "the media", they both have radically different views on things, therefore it is logical to assume that no one person controls both and, thus, no one actually "controls the media" at all. Surely this is the case?
    Personally I genuinely believe that the media is very selective in the information it publishes. I think predominately it is Jewish Owned and naturally they report anything bad about the islamic world and sensationalize it. How often do you hear anything bad about isreal on the mainstream news channels?
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Kutta)
    Personally I genuinely believe that the media is very selective in the information it publishes. I think predominately it is Jewish Owned and naturally they report anything bad about the islamic world and sensationalize it. How often do you hear anything bad about isreal on the mainstream news channels?
    Of course, because Al Jazeera, Russia Today, Press TV (all part of "the media") tend to be very pro-Israel, don't they?
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Kutta)
    Personally I genuinely believe that the media is very selective in the information it publishes. I think predominately it is Jewish Owned and naturally they report anything bad about the islamic world and sensationalize it. How often do you hear anything bad about isreal on the mainstream news channels?
    Frankly i can't think of a main stream UK based media source that i would say is strictly pro-Israel. The BBC are pretty much neutral, left wing papers like the Guardian don't like them and right wing papers like the Daily Mail also don't seem to like them.

    Israel does some pretty questionable acts but around 9000 Palestinian civilians have been killed since 1948 in what we know as the Israeli-Palestine conflict, they have the best human rights in that region by far and contribute massively to the world in the form of scientific and technological development.

    On the other hand 60,000 are estimated to have been killed in Syria over the space of a year and a half alone, countries that are considered in the Islamic world have the worst human rights on the planet by far and contribute very little (other than the oil which they received via geographic pot luck).

    Maybe the reason you hear so much bad about the Islamic world is because the Islamic world is in fact a bad place?
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Rhadamanthus)
    Of course, because Al Jazeera, Russia Today, Press TV (all part of "the media") tend to be very pro-Israel, don't they?
    those are clear exceptions, I am talking about "mainstream". ie Sky News, BBC, CNN etc.
    • Offline

      15
      (Original post by Rhadamanthus)
      Of course, because Al Jazeera, Russia Today, Press TV (all part of "the media") tend to be very pro-Israel, don't they?
      Actually I'd say RT is rather neutral in its reporting on Israeli issues, there is a huge diaspora of Russian Jews in Israel (more than the Arab countries combined) as well as a fair few prominent Jews within the Kremlin (RT is run by the state ) and having watched RT on and off recently (it is the only decent news channel for information on Russian goings on even if bias) all I can say is it is a lot more neutral on Israel and other Middle East issues than Western Media which surprised me although bias to hell in regards to Russian news and it is pretty anti-American/scaremongering in regards to America :lol:
      Offline

      13
      ReputationRep:
      I don't read newspapers or watch the news anyway.
      Offline

      13
      ReputationRep:
      (Original post by Darth Stewie)
      Frankly i can't think of a main stream UK based media source that i would say is strictly pro-Israel. The BBC are pretty much neutral, left wing papers like the Guardian don't like them and right wing papers like the Daily Mail also don't seem to like them.

      Israel does some pretty questionable acts but around 9000 Palestinian civilians have been killed since 1948 in what we know as the Israeli-Palestine conflict, they have the best human rights in that region by far and contribute massively to the world in the form of scientific and technological development.

      On the other hand 60,000 are estimated to have been killed in Syria over the space of a year and a half alone, countries that are considered in the Islamic world have the worst human rights on the planet by far and contribute very little (other than the oil which they received via geographic pot luck).

      Maybe the reason you hear so much bad about the Islamic world is because the Islamic world is in fact a bad place?
      excellent stats there, good goy
      Offline

      15
      ReputationRep:
      (Original post by Jack93o)
      excellent stats there, good goy
      Are you questioning the validity of the figure? It was estimated by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights.

      Here are a few sources
      Source 1
      Source 2
      Source 3
      Offline

      12
      ReputationRep:
      (Original post by Darth Stewie)
      Are you questioning the validity of the figure? It was estimated by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights.

      Here are a few sources
      Source 1
      Source 2
      Source 3
      He thinks you're being misled by a massive Jew-conspiracy. There is no reasoning with that kind of person. Figures, statistics, reality... they're all useless to that sort.
      Offline

      13
      ReputationRep:
      (Original post by Darth Stewie)
      Are you questioning the validity of the figure? It was estimated by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights.

      Here are a few sources
      Source 1
      Source 2
      Source 3
      no goyim, I was giving you a pat on the head, well done
      • Offline

        15
        (Original post by Jack93o)
        no goyim.
        The singular is goy, the plural is goyim... learnt Hebrew/Yiddish properly before posting as if you know the language.
        • Thread Starter
        Offline

        0
        ReputationRep:
        (Original post by Rhadamanthus)
        The piece is stupid, and obviously written by someone who's not bothered about repercussions, but it's obviously irony.

        You assume that I must be lying? Why? What leads you to believe I am not telling the truth? Have you no valid responses to my argument?

        the reason i am calling you a liar is because i just don't understand why you keep trying to say the times of israel piece is irony. its not. the jewish supremacist author is trying to be ironic in the first few paragraphs only.

        an article appeared a few years ago in the LA times talking about jewish control of hollywood and other areas of american society. the author, again, is boastful jewish supremacist who thinks much the same way as the guy who wrote the times of israel piece.he says:

        And maybe my life spent in a New Jersey-New York/Bay Area-L.A. pro-Semitic cocoon has left me naive. But I don't care if Americans think we're running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care that we get to keep running them.
        http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/...4676183.column

        no one is saying that jews being a little overrepresented in media means they are ethnic nepotists, but its not just a little overrepresentation. its a complete stranglehold. for example, all 8 major hollywood studios ( see the link above ) are owned by jews.

        that can only be explained by extreme ethnic networking and nepotism. jewish people are just 2% of american population so for them to be so dominant they would have to be literally a superior race of beings with IQ's all in the 200's. they are not.

        whats happening is a closed loop system. jewish supremacists use ethnic nepotism to get into positions of power and then once in power, use the positions of power to defend their positions......one of the reasons why even alluding to the "J" word in public is worse than admitting to being a peadophile is precisely because of this media pressure they can exert.


        ( i am talking about jewish supremacists here. these people all tend to be rabid zionists. so its not ALL jews or some sort of conspiracy. its just pure and simple ethnic networking by jewish supremacists )
       
       
       
    • See more of what you like on The Student Room

      You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

    • Poll
      What newspaper do you read/prefer?
      Useful resources
    • See more of what you like on The Student Room

      You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

    • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

      Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

      Quick reply
      Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.