Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free

Edexcel unit 1 Jan 2013 Watch

Announcements
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    How would you go about evaluating Milgrams agency theory? Any help is appreciated
    Maybe post your questions too, or tips on how to get maximum marks on a question, that sort of thing
    Good luck!
    -Eddy

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by snowster)
    How would you go about evaluating Milgrams agency theory? Any help is appreciated
    Maybe post your questions too, or tips on how to get maximum marks on a question, that sort of thing
    Good luck!
    -Eddy

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    +Supported by: Milgram 1963 who found that 65% of participants obeyed orders to shock an innocent victim to 450V
    Meeus and Raaijmaker 1986 who found that 92% of ps said all 15 stress remarks.

    + Explains the Holocaust - The Nazis were in the agentic state, carring out a legitimate authority figure's - Hitler's - orders to kill 6 million Jews.

    - Problems locating an exact agentic state: To follow orders you need to be in an agentic state, however you need to be in an agentic state to follow orders. This is a circular statement.

    - Doesn't explain individual differences to obeying authority e.g. in Milgram 63, Agency Theory doesn't explain why 35% of ps didn't show the victim to 450V despite still being in the same state they were at the beginning of the experiment.

    - However, supporting evidence, such as Milgram and Meeus and Raaijmaker, used a lab experiment with an artificial task and therefore the results lack both ecological and experimental validity.

    Tips:

    For studies do:
    Aim - 2 marks
    Procedure - 4 marks
    Results - 2 marks
    Conclusion - 2 marks
    Don't do aim - 1, procedure 7, results - 1, conclusion - 1.
    Unless the question is describing A/P/R/C.

    Evaluation is AS important as description. Don't think 1.5 sides for description and .5 pages for evaluation is enough. They should be equal.

    Fully explain points.

    For example, for an evaluation point for levels of processing:
    No one knows what deep processing is. - This would gain you 0 marks

    Craik and Lockhart failed to accurately define what 'deep' processing is. - You would get one mark.

    Craik and Lockhart failed to accurately define what was meant by 'deep' processing - it could be emotion associated with the information, time spent processing, or something else altogether. - This would gain you 2 marks.

    Remember, for each section you need to know 2 strengths and 2 weaknesses, so make them good ones worth 2 marks each.

    Do not leave 5 minutes for the 12 marker. You can kiss goodbye to a good grade if you do this. The 12 marker has 6 description and 6 evaluation marks AND you're marked on how well it's written. Give yourself at least 15 minutes for this question.

    For the multiple choice questions read them carefully.

    Don't talk crap. The examiner doesn't need to know what Milgram's confederate was called Mr. Wallace. It's irrelevant. What's more imporant is that 40 ps took mark in a lab experiment who responded to a newspaper article and were paid for their time.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Neon-Soldier32)
    +Supported by: Milgram 1963 who found that 65% of participants obeyed orders to shock an innocent victim to 450V
    Meeus and Raaijmaker 1986 who found that 92% of ps said all 15 stress remarks.

    + Explains the Holocaust - The Nazis were in the agentic state, carring out a legitimate authority figure's - Hitler's - orders to kill 6 million Jews.

    - Problems locating an exact agentic state: To follow orders you need to be in an agentic state, however you need to be in an agentic state to follow orders. This is a circular statement.

    - Doesn't explain individual differences to obeying authority e.g. in Milgram 63, Agency Theory doesn't explain why 35% of ps didn't show the victim to 450V despite still being in the same state they were at the beginning of the experiment.

    - However, supporting evidence, such as Milgram and Meeus and Raaijmaker, used a lab experiment with an artificial task and therefore the results lack both ecological and experimental validity.

    Tips:

    For studies do:
    Aim - 2 marks
    Procedure - 4 marks
    Results - 2 marks
    Conclusion - 2 marks
    Don't do aim - 1, procedure 7, results - 1, conclusion - 1.
    Unless the question is describing A/P/R/C.

    Evaluation is AS important as description. Don't think 1.5 sides for description and .5 pages for evaluation is enough. They should be equal.

    Fully explain points.

    For example, for an evaluation point for levels of processing:
    No one knows what deep processing is. - This would gain you 0 marks

    Craik and Lockhart failed to accurately define what 'deep' processing is. - You would get one mark.

    Craik and Lockhart failed to accurately define what was meant by 'deep' processing - it could be emotion associated with the information, time spent processing, or something else altogether. - This would gain you 2 marks.

    Remember, for each section you need to know 2 strengths and 2 weaknesses, so make them good ones worth 2 marks each.

    Do not leave 5 minutes for the 12 marker. You can kiss goodbye to a good grade if you do this. The 12 marker has 6 description and 6 evaluation marks AND you're marked on how well it's written. Give yourself at least 15 minutes for this question.

    For the multiple choice questions read them carefully.

    Don't talk crap. The examiner doesn't need to know what Milgram's confederate was called Mr. Wallace. It's irrelevant. What's more imporant is that 40 ps took mark in a lab experiment who responded to a newspaper article and were paid for their time.

    This was REALLY helpful. Thanks so much
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Will you be richer or poorer than your parents?
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.