Our definitions of 'natural' are clearly different.(Original post by Mankytoes)
So literally everything that exists is natural then? I was using the word natural in the sense of "as intended by nature". So a person having six fingers isn't natural, that isn't to say it doesn't occur in nature, but that it isn't what is supposed to happen in nature.
I'm not saying my definition is right and yours is wrong, but surely in this context mine is the more appropriate, otherwise the question is pointless because the answer will always be, as you have shown, "no, that's natural"?
Yours is a more colloquial term - I don't know of a dictionary that defines it as what you described - whereas I am using the actual definition.
I don't know what the OP intended 'natural' to mean, but I only understand words and phrases to mean their real definitions, except when a phrase is only known in a colloquial context.
Sexual perversion poll (What is it?) watch
View Poll Results: Which of these do you consider perverted or abnormal?Necrophilia8190.00%Beastiality7987.78%Peadophilia8291.11%Extra-marital sex1921.11%Inter-marital sex55.56%Homosexuality55.56%Anal sex1213.33%Any desire for sexual contact11.11%Oral sex00%Orgies2123.33%Threesomes1213.33%Prostitution2022.22%Voyeurism2628.89%Interacial sex22.22%Bondage1718.89%Incest7381.11%