Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Hello! can anyone help me on this? Much appreciated!

    Prove that a^2 = k mod 9 , where k is an element of (0,1,4,7)



    Thanks!
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    Any interger a is either -4, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 mod 9. Should be obvious from there.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Lord of the Flies)
    Any interger a is either -4, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 mod 9. Should be obvious from there.
    Thanks for answering.

    I get it that any of those integers squared would be 0 ,1 ,4 ,9 and 16 mod 9. Which can be reduced to 0,1,4,7 mod 9. Which is the values of k that I'm looking for.

    However, why do we limit the integer value of "a" from -4 to 4? That's the part I don't get. What's preventing "a" from being any other integer like say 6? I know 6^2 = 36 = 0 mod 9. But it doesn't make sense to prove this for every number as it's not possible.

    Thanks!
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by iamlovinit05)
    Thanks for answering.

    I get it that any of those integers squared would be 0 ,1 ,4 ,9 and 16 mod 9. Which can be reduced to 0,1,4,7 mod 9. Which is the values of k that I'm looking for.

    However, why do we limit the integer value of "a" from -4 to 4? That's the part I don't get. What's preventing "a" from being any other integer like say 6? I know 6^2 = 36 = 0 mod 9. But it doesn't make sense to prove this for every number as it's not possible.

    Thanks!
    It can be 6. But 6 = -3 mod 9

    I listed them in that particular way because it does the job twice as fast, but you could equally say "any integer is either 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 mod 9", square these and deduct an appropriate multiple of 9 and we get 0, 1, 4, 7.

    Or is it the fact that we have regrouped infinitely many integers into a finite number of categories which bothers you? The point of a mod is usually to characterise a number by its remainder when divided by another number. Of course, there are only 9 possible remainders when you divide by 9, so we can regroup all the integers in those 9 categories. These categories can range from -4 to 4, from 0 to 8, from 1 to 9, or whatever you like - it doesn't matter, they are all correct. The -4 to 4 is just easiest to work with!
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Lord of the Flies)
    It can be 6. But 6 = -3 mod 9

    I listed them in that particular way because it does the job twice as fast, but you could equally say "any integer is either 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 mod 9", square these and deduct an appropriate multiple of 9 and we get 0, 1, 4, 7.

    Or is it the fact that we have regrouped infinitely many integers into a finite number of categories which bothers you? The point of a mod is usually to characterise a number by its remainder when divided by another number. Of course, there are only 9 possible remainders when you divide by 9, so we can regroup all the integers in those 9 categories. These categories can range from -4 to 4, from 0 to 8, from 1 to 9, or whatever you like - it doesn't matter, they are all correct. The -4 to 4 is just easiest to work with!
    Ahh I get what you mean now! I didn't realize that the other integers were "taken care of" by the negative integers Thanks so much!

    But what happens if the 9 was changed to a bigger number, say 30. Do we have to list down a set of 30 integers and do this whole process again?
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by iamlovinit05)
    But what happens if the 9 was changed to a bigger number, say 30. Do we have to list down a set of 30 integers and do this whole process again?
    Exact same problem with 30 instead of 9? Yes you would have to list them, as tedious as that may sound. Again, the best way would be to list them as "part negative part positive", that way you only need to square half of them.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Lord of the Flies)
    Exact same problem with 30 instead of 9? Yes you would have to list them, as tedious as that may sound. Again, the best way would be to list them as "part negative part positive", that way you only need to square half of them.

    Alright thanks for clearing my doubt! You're a boss at this stuff. Respect.
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    What newspaper do you read/prefer?
    Useful resources

    Make your revision easier

    Maths

    Maths Forum posting guidelines

    Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

    Equations

    How to use LaTex

    Writing equations the easy way

    Student revising

    Study habits of A* students

    Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

    Study Planner

    Create your own Study Planner

    Never miss a deadline again

    Polling station sign

    Thinking about a maths degree?

    Chat with other maths applicants

    Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

    Groups associated with this forum:

    View associated groups
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.