Turn on thread page Beta
 You are Here: Home >< Maths

# Finite series proof watch

1. How can
be proven, without the usual writing the sequence in reverse and adding up.

Also for and .
2. (Original post by UKBrah)
How can

be proven, without the usual writing the
sequence in reverse and adding up.
Also for .
Are you asking about proof by induction?
3. Do you even lift brah?

And see what you make of this
4. (Original post by This Excellency)
Are you asking about proof by induction?
I suppose, but for PBI you're given the LHS and the RHS. When you're just given the summation how can you proof that it's equal to 1/2(n)(n+1) without the newfag method? Is it even possible?

(Original post by marcus2001)
Do you even lift brah?

And see what you make of this
revisingatthegym.jpeg

no.
5. I wrote this without properly reading that this is sixthform but I'm posting it anyway just in case it might be of use to someone
Let , and and , starting with the last and switching the order of summation we have

Therefore Do the same thing for then , and you will have all three sums.

This really only relies on order switch (the third step). Pretty much nothing else. In general it lets you write in terms of where of course (Shifting the index does the same thing for odd values of ).
6. (Original post by L'art pour l'art)
I wrote this without properly reading that this is sixthform but I'm posting it anyway just in case it might be of use to someone
Let , and and , starting with the last and switching the order of summation we have

Therefore Do the same thing for then , and and you will have all three sums.

This really only relies on order switch (the third step). Pretty much nothing else. In general it lets you write in terms of where of course (Shifting the index does the same thing for odd values of ).
Sweet.
7. For just the summation of r, consider a graph with n number of nodes and you wish to calculate the number of arcs that connect all the nodes together. Still with me? Now use the sum of an arithmetic series which is 1/2n(2a+d(n-1)), you know that the first term in essence is n, so a=n and the common difference will be -1 because you are losing a node every time, and the last term stays in terms of n, tidy that up to give the summation formula for r. That is one way of looking at it, no idea how to approach the rest.
8. (Original post by 3nTr0pY)
Sweet.
Cheers! :]

(Original post by Keynesian)
...
Cool... but a question?
Since any derivation of the formula for an arithmetic series is essentially a calculation of

I've a feeling though your argument can (combinatorially) be used to calculate the sum without using the formula, but I don't know enough. :[

If it's possible it's cooler and more beautiful that way (otherwise why introduce graphs rather than just plugging the values in the formula ).

Turn on thread page Beta

### Related university courses

TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Updated: January 5, 2013
Today on TSR

### Results day under a month away

How are you feeling?

Poll
Useful resources

## Make your revision easier

### Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

### How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

### Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

## Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE