The Student Room Group

Resultant field strength between two charged particles



I have no idea how to get the answer to the question.

Both particles will have a positive field strength, and the field strength can never equal zero. So I can't see how the sum of two postive numbers can ever equal zero?

Reply 1

Original post by jon889


I have no idea how to get the answer to the question.

Both particles will have a positive field strength, and the field strength can never equal zero. So I can't see how the sum of two postive numbers can ever equal zero?


at one point the field strength will equal zero. I think the answer is 40mm

the field strength will be zero when the distance is 20mm (the difference between the fields 8-2 = 6) so it must be the same each part hence 60mm / 6 = 10mm for each part so when its 2 the potential difference is 0 so field is 0 and they ask how far away is it from 8 so 60-20 = 40mm. Is that the answer?
(edited 12 years ago)

Reply 2

at one point the field strength will equal zero. I think the answer is 40mm

the field strength will be zero when the distance is 20mm (the difference between the fields 8-2 = 6) so it must be the same each part hence 60mm / 6 = 10mm for each part so when its 2 the potential difference is 0 so field is 0 and they ask how far away is it from 8 so 60-20 = 40mm. Is that the answer?


I don't know how to do this at all!!
what do u mean by that?

Reply 3

I don't know how to do this at all!!
what do u mean by that?


We know that the electric field strength is E=q4πϵ0r2E=\frac{q}{4\pi \epsilon_0 r^2}

We wish to calculate the point in between the particles such that the field strength is zero, so we set up the following equation.

q14πϵ0x2=q24πϵ0(60×103x)2\frac{q_1}{4\pi \epsilon_0 x^2}=\frac{q_2}{4\pi \epsilon_0 (60\times 10^{-3}-x)^2}

xmmx mm from one particle is (60x)mm(60-x) mm from another particle.

Substitute q1q_1 and q2q_2 and solve the quadratic equation, reject the impossible case(s), e.g. x>60mmx>60mm and here you go.
(edited 12 years ago)

Reply 4

Thanks for your answer. But isn't that just getting the distance when the two fields are equal and not neccessaroly zero?

If your finding the resultant I thought you have to add them?

Reply 5

The quick way of doing these (without the quadratic) is to realise that because the constant cancels on both sides you get

Q1R12=Q2R22\frac{Q_1}{R_1^2} = \frac{Q_2}{R_2^2}

R1 is the distance of Q1 from the zero point, and R2 the distance of Q2
Which gives the ratio of the distances as

R12R22=Q1Q2\frac{R_1^2}{R_2^2} = \frac{Q_1}{Q_2}

R1R2=Q1Q2\frac{R_1}{R_2} = \sqrt{\frac{Q_1}{Q_2}}

So the distance between the charges is divided in the ratio of the square roots of the charges.
8 / 2 = 4 and root 4 is 2 so the distance between them is in the ratio 2 to 1
This means it must be 40mm to 20mm giving 2 to one and 60mm in total.

Multiple choice for these will usually give a simple ratio for the charges.
Given the time allowed you need a quick way of doing it without having to solve quadratics.
So
Find the sq root of the ratio of the charges and divide the distance up in that proportion.

Reply 6

Original post by Stonebridge
The quick way of doing these (without the quadratic) is to realise that because the constant cancels on both sides you get
Q1R12=Q2R22\frac{Q_1}{R_1^2} = \frac{Q_2}{R_2^2}
R1 is the distance of Q1 from the zero point, and R2 the distance of Q2
Which gives the ratio of the distances as
R12R22=Q1Q2\frac{R_1^2}{R_2^2} = \frac{Q_1}{Q_2}
R1R2=Q1Q2\frac{R_1}{R_2} = \sqrt{\frac{Q_1}{Q_2}}
So the distance between the charges is divided in the ratio of the square roots of the charges.
8 / 2 = 4 and root 4 is 2 so the distance between them is in the ratio 2 to 1
This means it must be 40mm to 20mm giving 2 to one and 60mm in total.
Multiple choice for these will usually give a simple ratio for the charges.
Given the time allowed you need a quick way of doing it without having to solve quadratics.
So
Find the sq root of the ratio of the charges and divide the distance up in that proportion.

Wow, Thank you!

Quick Reply