The Student Room Group

PHYA5 ~ 20th June 2013 ~ A2 Physics

Scroll to see replies

Original post by SpiggyTopes
Yes you're right, sorry. I must have misread what you said, I thought you said 24.7 seemed too high.


that's all right, I thought that like 200MeV or whatever someone else said seemed too high. sorry for the confusion
Original post by bugsuper
FISSION releases more energy than FUSION
because even though the change in binding energy for each nucleon is less there are more nucleons involved


oh yeah. i was thinking about energy per kg of fuel
Reply 1642
I personally thought that the June 2012 with turning points was easier than this paper.
Original post by bugsuper
FISSION releases more energy than FUSION
because even though the change in binding energy for each nucleon is less there are more nucleons involved

I am confused. Is my answer 24.7 correct or not. Did they ask energy per nucleon or per nucleus
This paper was very bad for me.. sort of gave up because i couldnt do any of question 3..

For astrophysics did anyone else get 71.6 OR 72 For hubbles constant?
Original post by posthumus
de Broglie one .... 4 marker. I thought it was pretty sneaky

did anyone convert the eV into V by multiply eV by e

then multiplying it by e again to get eV

I thought it was sneaky as hell


Wait, what? I converted eV to joules, then used the kinetic energy approximation formula (I'm still annoyed they didn't tell us to ignore relativistic effects, they should be clearer) to find momentum and then put that into the de Broglie equation. You can't convert electronvolts to volts, electronvolts is a unit of energy, volts isn't.
Original post by Kenna
I personally thought that the June 2012 with turning points was easier than this paper.


Really? The section A in jun12 was a bit harder but the turning points were the same.

Posted from TSR Mobile
Guys from what I remember, the equation was:

4H -> He + 4e + ve

Mass of the helium nucleus was 4.002602u
The hydrogen atom was just a proton

So mass before = 4 x 1.67 x 10^-27 kg
Mass after = (4.002602 x 1.661 x 10^-27) + (4 x 9.11 x 10^-31) kg

Difference in mass = 2.8 x 10^-29 kg = 0.016878u

0.016878 x 931.3 = 15.7 MeV ?!!!

Can someone explain what I'm doing wrong
Reply 1648
Original post by FloydHead
Wait, what? I converted eV to joules, then used the kinetic energy approximation formula (I'm still annoyed they didn't tell us to ignore relativistic effects, they should be clearer) to find momentum and then put that into the de Broglie equation. You can't convert electronvolts to volts, electronvolts is a unit of energy, volts isn't.


I did this, i'm pretty sure my db-wavelength was 2.0x10^-(something..) to 2 sig figs.
Reply 1649
Defined the atomic mass unit as 1/12th of the mass of a carbon-12 nucleus. Think I should have wrote atom instead...
Original post by fizzbizz
Guys from what I remember, the equation was:

4H -> He + 4e + ve

Mass of the helium nucleus was 4.002602u
The hydrogen atom was just a proton

So mass before = 4 x 1.67 x 10^-27 kg
Mass after = (4.002602 x 1.661 x 10^-27) + (4 x 9.11 x 10^-31) kg

Difference in mass = 2.8 x 10^-29 kg = 0.016878u

0.016878 x 931.3 = 15.7 MeV ?!!!

Can someone explain what I'm doing wrong


Wasn't it two positrons, not four?
Original post by fizzbizz
Guys from what I remember, the equation was:

4H -> He + 4e + ve

Mass of the helium nucleus was 4.002602u
The hydrogen atom was just a proton

So mass before = 4 x 1.67 x 10^-27 kg
Mass after = (4.002602 x 1.661 x 10^-27) + (4 x 9.11 x 10^-31) kg

Difference in mass = 2.8 x 10^-29 kg = 0.016878u

0.016878 x 931.3 = 15.7 MeV ?!!!

Can someone explain what I'm doing wrong


1) there are 2 positrons, not 4
2) the mass is not 9.11 x 10^-31, that's in kg, you want it to be in u (atomic mass unit), which is 5.5 x 10^-4 u (i think)
Original post by fizzbizz
Guys from what I remember, the equation was:

4H -> He + 4e + ve

Mass of the helium nucleus was 4.002602u
The hydrogen atom was just a proton

So mass before = 4 x 1.67 x 10^-27 kg
Mass after = (4.002602 x 1.661 x 10^-27) + (4 x 9.11 x 10^-31) kg

Difference in mass = 2.8 x 10^-29 kg = 0.016878u

0.016878 x 931.3 = 15.7 MeV ?!!!

Can someone explain what I'm doing wrong


Why are you converting to kg then back to atomic units.
just use atomic all the way through and you would of got the correct value of 24.7mev
Reply 1653
Original post by AWithers95
Having done "Turning Points", I can't comment on the astro q's...
I agree with your answers - I got 0.016kg for the ice q.


Same for the ice...
Original post by Infinity1
Wasn't it two positrons, not four?


Original post by josephtsui
1) there are 2 positrons, not 4
2) the mass if not 9.11 x 10^-31, that's in kg, you want it to be in u (atomic mass unit), which is 5.5 x 10^-4 u (i think)


Even with two positrons, I get 16.7 MeV?!

And I'm aware of that, which is why I converted everything to kg first, then converted the mass difference to atomic mass units
Original post by fizzbizz
Guys from what I remember, the equation was:

4H -> He + 4e + ve

Mass of the helium nucleus was 4.002602u
The hydrogen atom was just a proton

So mass before = 4 x 1.67 x 10^-27 kg
Mass after = (4.002602 x 1.661 x 10^-27) + (4 x 9.11 x 10^-31) kg

Difference in mass = 2.8 x 10^-29 kg = 0.016878u

0.016878 x 931.3 = 15.7 MeV ?!!!

Can someone explain what I'm doing wrong


Not sure if I'm right but I used the numbers for rest mass energy on the second page of the data booklet.

(4(938.257))-((4.002602)(931.3)+2(0.510999))=24.38MeV

I checked on the internet for the equation and a website said it was ~27MeV so I think that's the right sort of answer

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by fizzbizz
Guys from what I remember, the equation was:

4H -> He + 4e + ve

Mass of the helium nucleus was 4.002602u
The hydrogen atom was just a proton

So mass before = 4 x 1.67 x 10^-27 kg
Mass after = (4.002602 x 1.661 x 10^-27) + (4 x 9.11 x 10^-31) kg

Difference in mass = 2.8 x 10^-29 kg = 0.016878u

0.016878 x 931.3 = 15.7 MeV ?!!!

Can someone explain what I'm doing wrong


the mass after wasn't that. It was 4.00150, wasn't it? because it was a helium-4 nucleus, which is an alpha particle
i guess it depends on what the mass of the final nucleus was, but I thought it was 4.00150u
Original post by bugsuper
the mass after wasn't that. It was 4.00150, wasn't it? because it was a helium-4 nucleus, which is an alpha particle


http://uk.ask.com/question/helium-nucleus
that was a nice paper ! and the medical physics section was even nicer !!!!! ahhhhh !! THANK THE LORD !!! revision really has paid off, hope you all smashed your examsss and get into the uni's you want :biggrin: THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR HELPPP, SERIOUSLY COULDN'T HAVE DONE IT WITHOUT YOU LOT :biggrin:

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending