My name is Ian Hayden. I am a Latin teacher in southern California. I attended the Accademia Vivarium Novum for the first time during the summer 2012 for the second month of the program, and then returned this past summer with my son to attend the first month. I, too, just joined this forum. I heard through the grapevine that this discussion was taking place. It was not hard to find - I simply Googled several keywords and it came right up.
I was surprised to read abitmiffed’s and Herperian’s posts as I, like so many others who’ve responded on this thread, had such a different experience from the one they described. For me, there is simply nowhere else in the world like the Accademia where one can fully immerse oneself in the language and engage with others whose aim is deep contact with Latin authors through the ages. The summer program at the Accademia is a very intellectually stimulating experience, very demanding, but incredibly rewarding. Lucilou 101’s observation that the program is “worthwhile only if you throw yourself into their unique style of learning” is true, but is a commonplace. I can’t think of a program that doesn’t follow that basic principle. Moreover, I think it is precisely the Accademia’s “unique style” that is the draw; it is why people go there. Aloisius Miraglia himself and others who have studied and taught at the Accademia are ubiquitous on the internet for those who might want to learn more and see first hand what the Accademia’s “unique style” consists of.
I was not “miffed,” therefore, but rather confused and bewildered over why a small group of other English speakers this summer seemed to refuse to engage with the program. They insisted, rather, on speaking with each other in English, and seemed to position themselves as hostile critics rather than participants who, under cover of pseudonyms, attempted to damage the Accademia and its teachers. That, of course, is why I’m lending my voice to the discussion. There is a big difference between a good faith attempt at informing the public about something worthwhile and a concerted effort to cause damage. As Ignacio recognized in his post, abitmiffed’s and Hesperian’s posts were clearly an attempt at the latter.
Any adult reader will immediately notice something petulant and immature about the complaints of abitmiffed and Hesperian (the days were too hot, they didn’t serve my favorite dishes, the teachers were mean to me because they didn’t call on me in class, they actually wanted me to speak in Latin, etc), just as there is too much drama and snarkiness in the snide, suggestive, sniping remarks of jneil. All of their dissatisfaction would have been much more constructively expressed as sappho suggested at the time of the post summer session debrief. The decision to launch a malicious internet campaign of sorts was ill-considered and childish, and disrespectful of the purpose of this forum, which,I gather, is intended for those seeking legitimate, balanced information as they make important decisions for themselves about their graduate studies.
More importantly, such a campaign was a rash and selfish attempt to damage one of the most important projects going on in the field of Latin pedagogy and humanist studies. The work of the men and, yes, women (gratias tib, Sara!) of the Accademia Vivarium Novum represents a deeply important break with the pedagogical tradition of the last two hundred years which has centered primarily on philology and grammar-translation and has led to precious few real readers of Latin (fluid reading, without perpetual reliance on glosses, commentaries, and dictionaries), and even fewer able to express their own thoughts and engage with others in the language. I share Ferdinandus’ incredulity expressed in his post that anyone having spent two months surrounded by men and women fluent in the language could have failed to recognize the uniqueness of the opportunity that presented itself to them, that they could have been in a virtual Latinist’s Elysium, but could see only darkness. It is a shame, really.
In the end, I hope that the collective weight of the thoughtful, rational, informative responses of so many who attended the summer program this year will more than convince any future reader of this discussion thread that abitmiffed and Hesperian chose to interpret their experiences in a manner that was at best idiosyncratic.