Why are immigrants hated in this country?

The Gulf states have all had their growth rates improved from migration. Alot of their infrastructure simply would not exist without inward migration. Of course they are selective about who enters, but they are more than willing to allow over 80% of their working male population to be foreigners. The GDP per capita metrics are also the highest in the world - none of these states pursue an immigration policy for the purpose of 'increasing diversity'. It is all about money.

Why should a guest worker be expected to 'integrate'. They are migrants who have specifically moved for work purposes. There is for example, no obligation to 'integrate' beyond abiding by local laws if you move to the United Arab Emirates for work, for example.

There is so much wrong with such a comparison.

Massive oil wealth and very small local populations.

They do not have lenient benefit systems.

Immigrant workers (non-professionals) work in much worse conditions than in Europe.

The vast majority of immigrant workers only have temporary residency, no recourse to government assistance and no pathway to citizenship.

And even if you ignore all that the social consequences of being race replaced can never be justified with short term economic perks. Just because someone else does it doesn't mean you should.

Neither can you expect any assistance from those Gulf state governments or expect to become a citizen. In the Gulf states the majority of immigrants have temporary work visas and have no path way to citizenship. They jealously guard who is a "citizen". As should all nation-states.

The migrant workers there are perfectly aware of this fact. But they are not taxed either - so thus the voting rights principle of 'no taxation without representation' does not apply either.

The Gulf Arabs are not going to be 'race-replaced' since the foreign population in their nations are very male-dominated. No male-dominated population is capable of race-replacing the indigenous people since men cannot breed with other men.

You could accommodate far higher expatriate populations in Western Europe through moving to a gastarbeiter system (as theyy use in the Gulf) - the foreign workers are taxed at a lower rate (as is the case for skilled non-Western foreigners in the Netherlands) but they do not acquire citizenship. Also you can incentivize male-dominated migration to ensure that migrant population growth rates are lower.

I suppose you can ignore the increase in immigrants in London and the 3/4 of a million white British that have left it and pretend that for some reason only white British people in London have suddenly begun to rape more even as their number have dropped drastically.

Since the government/police doesn't release this sort of data, or at least make it difficult. But the trend is self evident. And if the above was not the case the government would definitely make sure the information is published far and wide to support their "success".

Just pick up a book or two about this topic, they will reference their sources.

Some nations change the definition of what is classified as 'rape' which can lead to changes in conviction rates (e.g. Sweden).

If they British government are fully aware of the overrepresentation of foreigners in the rapists' profiles, how come they do not allow their health authorities to pemit prescription of medication that suppresses the male sex drive to foreigners (with the latter bearing the cost)? As I said before, I'm sure the Gulf states allow this, given the skewed gender ratio amongst the working population there.

I wonder how much tax an immigrant worker that earns £15-£20k pays, hmmm? Remember immigrants are doing the low paid work the locals supposedly don't want to do. They aren't the big earners and there is that thing called a progressive tax system the Left loves so much.

For one the feminists would eat you alive. But I agree a guest worker system would work if enforced religiously. The problem is several European countries have tried it, Germany in particular, and it didn't work. Those temporary guest Turks are still there generations later.

In theory I agree. Non-citizenship and if you stop working you get kicked out. It could work if you only do so with higher educated workers because they are far less likely to disappear and employers are less likely to hire them illegally.

Of course we have bleeding heart liberals bemoaning how you cannot kick out a worker because his kids were born here. I want what you suggested but the overall paradigm of the European countries making their own well-being and best interests subservient to everyone else is the major stumbling block.

If the immigrant worker is a single man with no dependents then he is not likely to require use of public services which are free at the point of use in the UK (healthcare, education etc.) so it is more than possible that he can be a net contributor even on a salary less than GBP 20k. Furthermore, if he is a young, single man then it is likely that he has more time which he can devote to work (i.e. he will be able to work in multiple jobs, on evenings/weekends etc.) which can maximise his earning power.

Actually migrant men target every section of your labour market - all the way from the lowest-skilled jobs to the highest-skilled jobs. A significant number of the big earners are migrant men - just take one look at the City of London. Furthermore if you look at any technical industry (software engineering, derivatives trading, pharmaceuticals, maritime/shipping, oil-rig construction) you will find immigrant men overrepresented - these industries tend to pay higher than the national averages.

In fact, if you look at most companies within such industries in the Netherlands, there are more migrant men - particularly from China, India and Russia in ABSOLUTE terms (i.e. not relative terms) than there are Dutch women - this despite the apparently better academic performance of Western females in their local education systems. In the Netherlands they have what is called the 30% ruling - a tax exemption to incentivize niet-Westerse allochtoon (non-Western foreigners) to locate to the Netherlands for work over other parts of Western Europe (London, Paris, Ruhr Valley & Rheinlan etc.).

Why would the feminists eat us alive? Many nations already allocate points to prospective entrants based on their lack of children (i.e. more likely to be net contributors).

Probably it is not likely to work in Germany since it is a country with high tax rates - if you are going to tax people extortionately then they will demand political representation in response. There is no reason to actually kick someone out when they stop working - you can just block their access to free use of public services and to welfare payments.

through work no one in this country usually wants (factory, kebab shop)

I've never heard or seen any British white person (or even a British black person or chinese person) apply for a job or work in a kebab shop. Such shops are usually family run and employ mostly Italians, Greeks, or Turks. Come to St Helens or Wigan and you'll find many young British males (mainly white) apply for factory jobs all the time. I, myself, have applied for such manual labor jobs, even taking cleaning jobs part-time. Sometimes I have been unsuccessful and found that an immigrant (mainly Polish or Iraqi) has taken the position. I once got an interview to work in a pizza place in Liverpool, and the majority of applicants who got to the interview stage where Europeans, Polish mainly. And at Liverpool when I was a barman, before I left, almost all the staff (mainly University students) were replaced by young Polish girls. After I left that place I got a job as a kitchen porter along with four other Polish people (2 females and 2 males). So I think that the notion that Brits don't want to do these jobs is simply not true. But what is true is that many employers seem to want to hire foreign workers more so than your typical British worker. The reasons for this are not clear but it seems to be based upon the notion that Brits have little or no work ethic. I suspect that the truth is that Brits won't stand for bullying and harrassment whereas foreign workers will. Whilst I was a kitchen porter the chef started bullying the porters, and only I and another colleague stood up to him, whereas our Polish colleagues stood by and said or did nothing about it. Foreign workers will also not answer back to the boss, and will work over-time without pay, something that I have witnessed myself on many occasions.

If that was the case in the UK you would see the same increase throughout the country. You don't, it is only in certain immigrant hotspots.


I am not sure how serious you are with this comment. I didn't even know that is possible but even if it is you know very well that no government in Europe would be able to do this due to Human Rights and Racial Discrimination activists/lawyers/media etc.

It is not enforceable anyway. You can prescribe it but you can't exactly force people to use it. Finally, why should Europeans foot the bill for this when the immigrants shouldn't be here in the first place?

That has absolutely no bearing on the argument. Birth rates among non-white European immigrants are much higher than native birth rates. They are having the kids here.

The feminists would eat you alive for wanting to favour male immigration as opposed to female.

People generally dislike what is intiniscally different.

Immigrants bring with them a vary alien and sometimes dislikeable culture, moral and social values.

They don't have to actually show this in public though.

Many immigrant men bring wives with or do so later. If you earn £35000 you pay ~£7k tax. The England & Wales government spend that amount per capita. So there is no contribution.

Considering that non-white immigration birth rates are so high the net effect is that "single immigrant men" are a rarity. However they arrive they are contributing to local birth rates that are not native.