Join TSR now and get all your revision questions answeredSign up now
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Hi.

    I was trying out some questions on Moments, and I just cannot hack this one in particular!

    Any help please?

    (sorry for the bad quality)
    Attached Images
     
    • Peer Support Volunteers
    • Clearing and Applications Advisor
    • Study Helper
    Offline

    18
    (Original post by FaisalTreShah)
    Hi.

    I was trying out some questions on Moments, and I just cannot hack this one in particular!

    Any help please?

    (sorry for the bad quality)
    What have you tried/what are your thoughts?
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by usycool1)
    What have you tried/what are your thoughts?
    Well so far, I've just ignored the particle of weight and I've calculated the reaction forces, where C = 100N and D = 120N. From here I just have no idea on what I should do. D:
    • Peer Support Volunteers
    • Clearing and Applications Advisor
    • Study Helper
    Offline

    18
    (Original post by FaisalTreShah)
    Well so far, I've just ignored the particle of weight and I've calculated the reaction forces, where C = 100N and D = 120N. From here I just have no idea on what I should do. D:
    OK, there wasn't really any need to do that.

    I suggest you first draw your own diagram with a point "E" marked on it for the particle to make things clearer.

    Then resolve vertically to get the magnitude of the reactions at C and D in terms of W.

    Make sense? See if you can go on from there.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by FaisalTreShah)
    Well so far, I've just ignored the particle of weight and I've calculated the reaction forces, where C = 100N and D = 120N. From here I just have no idea on what I should do. D:
    Resolve at specific points of the rod?
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by LaserBeamedOrgs)
    Resolve at specific points of the rod?
    No, you resolve all the forces acting vertically on the rod. It is in equilibrium so there cannot be a net force. You need not worry about their point of application because in equilibrium there will be no unbalanced moment, either.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by usycool1)
    OK, there wasn't really any need to do that.

    I suggest you first draw your own diagram with a point "E" marked on it for the particle to make things clearer.

    Then resolve vertically to get the magnitude of the reactions at C and D in terms of W.

    Make sense? See if you can go on from there.
    Thank you so much! I've just tried doing it your way, but this is what I've managed to end up with... somehow. o_O

    I know your method is right but I know I've gone wrong somewhere. Can you please show me my error?
    Attached Images
     
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by FaisalTreShah)
    Thank you so much! I've just tried doing it your way, but this is what I've managed to end up with... somehow. o_O

    I know your method is right but I know I've gone wrong somewhere. Can you please show me my error?
    You've taken Moments at A and B but haven't included that both RC and RD are upward forces.
    Moments at A: 2.5RD + RC = Wx + 2*150
    Moments at B: 1.5RD + 3RC = Wx + 2*150
    It should all come out from here.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Brister)
    No, you resolve all the forces acting vertically on the rod. It is in equilibrium so there cannot be a net force. You need not worry about their point of application because in equilibrium there will be no unbalanced moment, either.
    That is what you initially do, then you resolve around a specific point, refer to the latest post on the thread, those equations that he has displayed, those can only be achieved by resolving clockwise and anticlockwise at a point on the rod
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by LaserBeamedOrgs)
    That is what you initially do, then you resolve around a specific point, refer to the latest post on the thread, those equations that he has displayed, those can only be achieved by resolving clockwise and anticlockwise at a point on the rod
    Yes, we call that taking moments. You resolve forces and take moments. I just misunderstood your statement.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    I take it you now understand what you have to do, just remember to always take moments about the same point
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Season One)
    I take it you now understand what you have to do, just remember to always take moments about the same point
    Again, thank you everyone who took their time out to help me. Unfortunately, I've STILL got it wrong (by this point half the internet world screams in frustration and agony to my lack of intelligence regarding Moments ¬_¬) but it's most likely due to how I've approached the question.

    It makes no sense! Usually I'm good at this topic, but this question alone has made me change my mind. -_-

    I will keep practising, I may also ask my teacher for help. Thank you all once more for helping me out.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by FaisalTreShah)
    Again, thank you everyone who took their time out to help me. Unfortunately, I've STILL got it wrong (by this point half the internet world screams in frustration and agony to my lack of intelligence regarding Moments ¬_¬) but it's most likely due to how I've approached the question.

    It makes no sense! Usually I'm good at this topic, but this question alone has made me change my mind. -_-

    I will keep practising, I may also ask my teacher for help. Thank you all once more for helping me out.
    Yeah asking your teacher would probably be the best idea, hard to explain over the Internet
 
 
 
Poll
If you won £30,000, which of these would you spend it on?
Useful resources

Make your revision easier

Maths

Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

Equations

How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

Student revising

Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

Study Planner

Create your own Study Planner

Never miss a deadline again

Polling station sign

Thinking about a maths degree?

Chat with other maths applicants

Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Quick reply
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.