You are Here: Home >< Physics

# Electric Potential Due to A Uniformly Charged Sphere watch

1. Hello, I'm trying to find the electric potential due to a uniformly charged sphere, radius R. I use the definition,

because dl is in the -r direction. This gives the negative of the answer I should have, why is this?
2. (Original post by KeyFingot)
Hello, I'm trying to find the electric potential due to a uniformly charged sphere, radius R. I use the definition,

because dl is in the -r direction. This gives the negative of the answer I should have, why is this?
You need to also change your limits to correspond to r which would be from r to infinity.

Hopefully you can see this if you write,

, just by inverting the limits.

Now, from this we can see that the vector dl now goes in the same direction as dr, so we get

3. (Original post by dknt)
You need to also change your limits to correspond to r which would be from r to infinity.

Hopefully you can see this if you write,

, just by inverting the limits.

Now, from this we can see that the vector dl now goes in the same direction as dr, so we get

OK I think I understand but why did my original method not work?
4. (Original post by KeyFingot)
Hello, I'm trying to find the electric potential due to a uniformly charged sphere, radius R. I use the definition,

because dl is in the -r direction. This gives the negative of the answer I should have, why is this?
The integral is correct (second expression in the line) It's from infinity to R as it represents the work done moving a positive charge from infinity to R.
So Q is positive. The work done by the force is F (-dr) where dr is in the negative r direction due to the fact that the force is repulsive and the applied force by the external agent is towards the sphere.
So the negative sign is there in the integral expression. For some reason it has disappeared in your third expression. Why is that?
When you then integrate the negative expression within those limits the expression for electric potential (with 1/r in it) will be positive. This is correct as the potential due to a positively charged sphere is positive at its surface.
5. (Original post by Stonebridge)
The integral is correct (second expression in the line) It's from infinity to R as it represents the work done moving a positive charge from infinity to R.
So Q is positive. The work done by the force is F (-dr) where dr is in the negative r direction due to the fact that the force is repulsive and the applied force by the external agent is towards the sphere.
So the negative sign is there in the integral expression. For some reason it has disappeared in your third expression. Why is that?
When you then integrate the negative expression within those limits the expression for electric potential (with 1/r in it) will be positive. This is correct as the potential due to a positively charged sphere is positive at its surface.
The negative sign disappeared because I was integrating from infinity to r, so which cancels with the minus outside the integral.
6. Oh I understand now, I changed the sign on the "dl" part but not the limits hence my answer had a factor of -1 when it shouldn't. Thank you both for your help!

### Related university courses

TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Updated: March 28, 2013
Today on TSR

### A-Level OCR Biology Unofficial Markscheme

Find out how you've done here

### 1,341

students online now

Exam discussions

### Find your exam discussion here

Poll

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE