The Student Room Group

F581/ F582 Economics June 2013

Scroll to see replies

Original post by Fas
erm... the question we are on about ( the demand and supply diagram one ) had absolutely NOTHING to do with sun beds or tan accelerator products. Or negative externalities , or consumer surplus.


the demand supply , the one with consumer surplus or the 4 mark one, oh that one i just shifted the D BECUASE A Decrease OF CONSUMER INCOME.
(edited 10 years ago)
I only shifted demand for the D+S question, reason being is I'm pretty sure the question specified the foreign holiday market. But it did putdemand and supply, so I don't really know.

Anyone else find a use for those PED values? (so much for calculating elasticties)
Original post by NedStark
I only shifted demand for the D+S question, reason being is I'm pretty sure the question specified the foreign holiday market. But it did putdemand and supply, so I don't really know.

Anyone else find a use for those PED values? (so much for calculating elasticties)


question specified demand and supply im certain - i ended up shifting both anyway , although anything could be right here - some people only shifted supply , some only shifted demand , some shifted both - who knows ! :smile:

nah pretty sure they were irrelevant haha - well i didn't use them anyway
Original post by Fas
question specified demand and supply im certain - i ended up shifting both anyway , although anything could be right here - some people only shifted supply , some only shifted demand , some shifted both - who knows ! :smile:

nah pretty sure they were irrelevant haha - well i didn't use them anyway


Well I hope I haven't lost too many marks, losing them on a D+S diagram is the worst. It did put "and" in bold so you're probably right.

And no Jan exams so retaking is a bit of a problem.

Overall, macro was easier imo
Original post by NedStark
Well I hope I haven't lost too many marks, losing them on a D+S diagram is the worst. It did put "and" in bold so you're probably right.

And no Jan exams so retaking is a bit of a problem.

Overall, macro was easier imo


that section A bit of macro was really nice , and the essay was quite hard i thought - my macro essay was royally **** hahaha
Why did everyone move the supply and demand curve when it only mentioned demand of holidays decreasing and supply of filghts also decreasing. The question was about holidays and supply of flights is not the same as supply of holidays right?
(edited 10 years ago)
Original post by Rickrossmmg
Why did everyone move the supply and demand curve when it only mentioned demand of holidays decreasing and supply of filghts also decreasing. The question was about holidays and supply of flights is not the same as supply of holidays right?


how do you go on holiday to a foreign country without a plane ? :tongue:
what did people put for the " comment on the likely impact of information failure on the sun beds and tan accelerator product market " question ?
Original post by Fas
how do you go on holiday to a foreign country without a plane ? :tongue:

A ship? A train(Eurostar)?:confused:
Original post by Rickrossmmg
A ship? A train(Eurostar)?:confused:


i meant in the case study - since that question was referring to the demand and supply of the foreign holiday market - since the supply of flights had decreased , the overall supply of foreign holidays will have decreased.. there was no mention whatsoever of an alternative BUT you could have mentioned that in a comment now that i think about it
Original post by Fas
i meant in the case study - since that question was referring to the demand and supply of the foreign holiday market - since the supply of flights had decreased , the overall supply of foreign holidays will have decreased.. there was no mention whatsoever of an alternative BUT you could have mentioned that in a comment now that i think about it

Alright thanks. Will I get any marks though?
Original post by Rickrossmmg
Alright thanks. Will I get any marks though?


can;t say for definite i'm afraid - and it's probably best that i don't comment as im not really in a position to
Original post by hello my name is
the question was regarding sun beds and tan allc not aero planes so no. uare r all wrong btw if its negative extr then the supply ONLY shifts to the left because of over production
demand decreasing because of consumer surplus noting else there a reason why they split the case study into 2.

It was actually referring to the holiday market, so your wrong yourself lol
Original post by Fas
can;t say for definite i'm afraid - and it's probably best that i don't comment as im not really in a position to

Yh I understand:smile:
Reply 954
Original post by Rickrossmmg
Yh I understand:smile:


Ricky Rozay, are you doing transport economics this year?
Reply 955
Original post by iggyDash
Yes?


Hmmm I would have assumed that if they specified that there was an increase in price, then you would surely see that in your diagram or am I just completely wrong? Also, I asked a friend about what he did for that question and he shifted both S/D to the left and said that he had a slight increase in price....
Reply 956
The questions was asking why regulation is a good answer because of information failure.
When a negative externality is present, the consume is fairly selfish as they are only interested in their own benefits and costs. The reason information occurred is because people were unwilling to listen. The regulation in the case study wasn't put in to provide information. It was applied to stop consumption of them by under 18s. Therefore stopping the over consumption as society could then no longer consume more than the society equilibrium Q-reg.

Original post by JamesMartinez
Can someone who's confident please evaluate my essay question?

It asked about whether regulation was the best method of fixing market failure associated with information failure.

I started off with definitions of market and information failure and went on to say I was using tanning beds as an example of information failure (from case study). I then said that for regulation the government could pass a law forcing firms to provide information regarding the risks of using sunbeds to all potential customers before they use the beds. I then weighed up the good points of this before saying how it would be tricky and costly to enforce and firms might well just ignore the law depending on the severity of the pentaltly, and also how it was ineffective as most people have made up their minds as to whether they're using them before the leave for the salon. I then offered information provision as an alternative, suggesting a televised ad campaign as an option. I said positives were that it could be targeted (by airing it at certain times on certain channels), unbiased as the info was from the gov. and as the information would be provided before the potential consumer had decided to use them. Also you know it will be aired, as in unlike the salons, you know that this information will be provided. For negatives I added that it is costly and the information would only be provided for as long as the ad campaign was aired for. I then summed up that information provision was the better option, stating reasons and generally summing up.


WOULD THIS BE GOOD FOR MY ESSAY? WAS MY REGULATION OPTION GOOD?

PLEASE SOMEONE READ THIS, I'M SO WORRIED.
(edited 10 years ago)
Reply 957
Yes, that is what they wanted you to do!

Original post by Shaadi Baba
I analysed the regulation applied in the case study. Which was banning under 18s from using sunbeds. Will I still be okay?


Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 958
But they said information failure as the key. You don't use taxes on information failure as the individual will consume them regardless. Tanning beds are a habit forming good and a demerit good. Therefore tax will make no difference.

Original post by Kenny Loftun
For the 18 marker question, I just applied the information failure and regulation to the case study (sun beds) which were mentioned in the last paragraph.

Used indirect taxation as an alternative as it internalises the external costs associated with the negative externality.
Reply 959
WTF? Haha! The income elasticity of demand isn't a percentage. They gave you the elasticities in the case study. They didn't ask you to calculate them. They asked you to comment on them. Foreign holidays was + meaning it is a luxury good and as income fall, the demand for these also fall. The UK holidays was negative and an inferior good and as income fell people would consume more or these as still can't afford holidays abroad. No idea what you did with yours but I can tell you it isn't correct! The equation is % change in QD/ % change in income. It didn't even give you the % change in QD. They were elasticities. The numbers should work out as 2.1 or 1.4! Not percentages.

Original post by Student8
yeah +16% for holidays UK
and -20% for foreign holidays

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending