Ok can I offer my two cents worth as someone that has been a quaklified pharmacist for 7 years. Emmz and BB you are both right, as most pharmacists did originally apply for pharmacy and there are some schools that now offer places to people that have failed to get into medical and dental school. How can you both be right? Well here's the explanation. When I applied to do pharmacy 11 years ago there where only 10 schools of pharmacy in the UK. Therefore pharmacy was highly competative. The "A levels werent modular then so the grades were different, but the offers then were typically BBB for medicine, BBC for pharmacy and BCC for dentistry. Because of this, there was quite often occasions where peole used to miss the grades for Phammacy and get into dentistry on clearing. Back then it was very differnt, and to even get an offer for Pharmacy you had to express total commitment, and even an inkling of wanting to do medicine would provoke an instant "next!" from the admissions tutor. Why the change? Well it all comes down to the flood of new Pharmacy schools that have come into existance ion the past 5 years. there are now close to 30 Pharmacy schools and the number is rising, and every new pharmacy school has to compete to get the students. For example, Manchester used to compete with Liverpool and Bradford for the Northern students and that was it. Bradford wasnt even an issue for the other two as at the time it was a 4-year sandwhich course and Pharmacy was a three year BSc so people just naturalyl wanted to do three years and make the dosh. Now Keele, Wolverhampton and soon Leeds have come into the equation but there are still only the same number of A level students. Consequently, the offers have become lower and now the order of gradesm instead of being medicine, pharmacy and the n dentistry, are medicine and dentistry the same, then pharmacy. Plus, because all the schools are falling over themselves to get the students they are less sensitive to the medicine reject issue so will make offers to prospective medics. Another point is that in my day people could apply to 6 medical schools not 4, but n ow they are expected to have a backup plan so nobody will penalise a student for putting pharmacy as second. Therefore we are now in a situation where theoretically at least someone can use pharmacy as a course to do if they fail to get into medicine or dentistry. So the point I'm making is that the competativeness is to do with (a) the massive increase in the number of spharmacy schools; and (b) the relative lowering of the pharmacy offers, where (b) has directly come about because of (a), and I think it has little to do with any change in people's desire to do one course over the other or the worth of the career. One final point I will make though, is that the comopetativeness between Pharmacists and Medics never goes away. Whilst there are now lots of opportunities for pharms and docs to work together, I think that in too many cases, the only contact a pharmacist has with a doctor is when the pharmacist rings up hte doctor to tell them that they've prescribed something wroing. Not comducive to a good working relationship. Hope that schanges soon wehen you youn 'uns qualify.