Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Hi everyone

    I am struggling to do this problem in math:

    Show that the plane r.(3i-2j+k)=1 contains the line r=3i+3j-2k+t(i+j-k).

    Does anyone has any suggestions? Any help will be greatly appreciated



    Thank you
    • PS Helper
    • Study Helper
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    PS Helper
    Study Helper
    I have two ways: a "cheaty" way, and a more "this is what we're examining" way.
    The cheaty way: two points on the line are (3,3,-2) and (4,4,-3). You can check by substituting in the values that both these points lie on the plane. Hence the entire line lies on the plane, since that's the only way a line can intersect a plane twice.

    The alternative way:
    You need to do two things: show that t(i+j-k) is parallel to the plane, and that (3,3,-2) lies on the plane. That will tell you that the line lies in the plane.
    To show that the point is on the plane should be straightforward by substituting in the values. The parallel line: if you substitute the form of the line, r=3i+3j-2k+t(i+j-k) into the equation r.(3i-2j+k)=1, you get that 1=1, as required. (I'm not certain whether you actually have to show that the point is in the plane; this should actually work without that step.)
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    I did something weird and I am not sure if it is correct: I have made the equation of the plane equal to the equation of the line so I could solve for t. As a result I found out that t was 0. Does this suggest that the plane and the line do not intersect? Can you use this method in order to prove that the line is in the plane?

    Thank you for your help




    (Original post by Smaug123)
    I have two ways: a "cheaty" way, and a more "this is what we're examining" way.
    The cheaty way: two points on the line are (3,3,-2) and (4,4,-3). You can check by substituting in the values that both these points lie on the plane. Hence the entire line lies on the plane, since that's the only way a line can intersect a plane twice.

    The alternative way:
    You need to do two things: show that t(i+j-k) is parallel to the plane, and that (3,3,-2) lies on the plane. That will tell you that the line lies in the plane.
    To show that the point is on the plane should be straightforward by substituting in the values. The parallel line: if you substitute the form of the line, r=3i+3j-2k+t(i+j-k) into the equation r.(3i-2j+k)=1, you get that 1=1, as required. (I'm not certain whether you actually have to show that the point is in the plane; this should actually work without that step.)
    • PS Helper
    • Study Helper
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    PS Helper
    Study Helper
    (Original post by beatrice15)
    I did something weird and I am not sure if it is correct: I have made the equation of the plane equal to the equation of the line so I could solve for t. As a result I found out that t was 0. Does this suggest that the plane and the line do not intersect? Can you use this method in order to prove that the line is in the plane?

    Thank you for your help
    You can't just set the equation of the plane equal to that of the line: the reason it's invalid to compare the two is that r.(3i-2j+k) = 1 is a scalar, whereas r = 3i+3j-2k + t(i+j+k) is a vector, so you can't compare them. It's just like saying (3,4,2) = 5; it just doesn't make sense mathematically. What you can do is substitute the line equation wherever r appears in the plane equation, because then you're just swapping in the "same expression" - r is a vector and 3i+3j-2k + t(i+j+k) is a vector, so it's fine to interchange between the two.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Thank you this helped me a lot

    (Original post by Smaug123)
    You can't just set the equation of the plane equal to that of the line: the reason it's invalid to compare the two is that r.(3i-2j+k) = 1 is a scalar, whereas r = 3i+3j-2k + t(i+j+k) is a vector, so you can't compare them. It's just like saying (3,4,2) = 5; it just doesn't make sense mathematically. What you can do is substitute the line equation wherever r appears in the plane equation, because then you're just swapping in the "same expression" - r is a vector and 3i+3j-2k + t(i+j+k) is a vector, so it's fine to interchange between the two.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Smaug123)
    I have two ways: a "cheaty" way, and a more "this is what we're examining" way.
    The cheaty way: two points on the line are (3,3,-2) and (4,4,-3). You can check by substituting in the values that both these points lie on the plane. Hence the entire line lies on the plane, since that's the only way a line can intersect a plane twice.

    The alternative way:
    You need to do two things: show that t(i+j-k) is parallel to the plane, and that (3,3,-2) lies on the plane. That will tell you that the line lies in the plane.
    To show that the point is on the plane should be straightforward by substituting in the values. The parallel line: if you substitute the form of the line, r=3i+3j-2k+t(i+j-k) into the equation r.(3i-2j+k)=1, you get that 1=1, as required. (I'm not certain whether you actually have to show that the point is in the plane; this should actually work without that step.)
    Any Website or tutorial that can help revise all the concepts?
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Would you like to hibernate through the winter months?
    Useful resources

    Make your revision easier

    Maths

    Maths Forum posting guidelines

    Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

    Equations

    How to use LaTex

    Writing equations the easy way

    Student revising

    Study habits of A* students

    Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

    Study Planner

    Create your own Study Planner

    Never miss a deadline again

    Polling station sign

    Thinking about a maths degree?

    Chat with other maths applicants

    Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

    Groups associated with this forum:

    View associated groups
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.