15/15 essay:
“The government has launched a number of policies to try to combat gender and ethnic inequality in the UK, with a mixed degree of success.
Gender inequality has been tackled in a number of ways. For example, the Equal Pay and Sex Discrimination Acts have been bolstered to give more protection and backdate e.g. all pay claims. Systems of tax credits and child support and the minimum wage have been introduced among other things to help lone (often female) parent families. The state pension age has been increased to 65 for both men and women to ensure parity – and a new Equality and Human Rights Commission has been set up to combat discrimination.
These measures have had, on the whole, mixed success. The incomes of women have increased at double the rate of men over recent years – over 11%. However, there still is a gender pay gap of 24% in the UK today (15% in Scotland in 2008 figures) with the inequality rising to 44% in the financial and banking industry. Indeed, gender discrimination appears to continue in recruitment also, with only 80% of senior police officers in the UK for example being women. It could be argued, therefore that intervention by government has had little success. Systems of financial credits and interventions appear to have had some success at combating gender inequality – and it was estimated that at the last increase of the minimum wage over 2 million people benefited – many from the hospitality and other sectors being women. The tax credit system is estimated to have cut poverty among lone parent families in Scotland by over 20%, however, centres claim the recent over payments and demands by the Exchequer for money back hit families – often vulnerable – hard. The system of child support and maintenance introduced by the government may have had less success in reducing gender inequality among lone parents, with 85% of claims admitted as incorrectly calculated by the Child Support Agency. Indeed, the government is intending to scrap the agency and replace it with a new body. Therefore, government action has help to an extent in reducing gender inequality.
The government has attempted in the past to reduce racial in-equalities in a number of ways. It has abolished the Commission for Racial Equality and replaced it with the Equality and Human Rights Commission, with new powers and the Eequality Act 2006. It has introduced a package of reform – including the New Deal – often targeted at areas of deprivation where there is a large minority ethnic community.
Overall, progress at reducing racial inequality has been mixed. The new EHRC, critics claim, has done little to protect those in need of support, however its predecessor body – the CRE – did bring several court cases where racial discrimination was an issue. The New Deal has helped over a million people in the UK get work since its inception many of those from minority ethnic communities, however, a recent commons committee report found that many were out of work. There is also evidence that racial inequality still pervades society: 52% of Pakistani and Bangladeshi community are in HRAI partly compared to 8% of the white populations. However, one instance bucking this trend is the Indian community, which appears to have higher average incomes than whites. Indeed, a recent edition of the General Household Survey has shown that people of ethnic minority backgrounds often get paid similar sums to their white counterparts for the same work. Thus, it is fair to say that there has been some progress in reducing inequalities, though there is still much to be done – particularly in relation to poverty.
The government has piloted a number of programmes aimed at reducing inequality. Many of these programmes have reduced inequality in gender and race to some extent, although on current evidence there are clear examples of inequality still pervading the UK.”
____
I have a few more which I can trade for CHINA / SOUTH AFRICA / ELECTORAL essays. Private message me.