The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

Original post by justinawe
I still have no idea how I didn't get 100 for C1, and C3 I somehow wasted enough time that I couldn't to the last part of the final question... worth like 4 raw marks :colonhash: 5 more mins and I would have got 100, even 3/4 marks in that question would have given me 100 UMS! (because that paper was 74/75 for full UMS)

I'm ungrateful (:lol:) tbh, I should have done better.


C1 fair enough, me too.
C3 your own fault :mmm:
Has anyone who has got an A at stats got any tips to do well in the exam ?


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by joostan
Ahh, I love a good DE, I'll see if I can dig something up :tongue:


Who doesn't :tongue: Thanks I'm looking forward to attempting it tomorrow :biggrin:


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by L'Evil Fish
C1 fair enough, me too.
C3 your own fault :mmm:


:emo:

I know I'll probably get hate for this, but 95 in C3 seems quite subpar... and not representative of my ability imo :redface:

97/98 would have been fine, but 95 :/
Here is my plan:

Smash C3 and aim for 100.
Try and get a good A in C4.

Which definitely means an A* if I get C3 100 and any A in C4.

Then, say I applied for Cambridge. I would do my three strongest FM modules, to show I can get consistent 95+.

Good plan?:ahee:
Original post by MathsNerd1
Who doesn't :tongue: Thanks I'm looking forward to attempting it tomorrow :biggrin:
Posted from TSR Mobile

I expect somebody doesn't :lol:
Original post by L'Evil Fish
Here is my plan:

Smash C3 and aim for 100.
Try and get a good A in C4.

Which definitely means an A* if I get C3 100 and any A in C4.

Then, say I applied for Cambridge. I would do my three strongest FM modules, to show I can get consistent 95+.

Good plan?:ahee:


Why not smash C4 as well? :sly:
Original post by joostan
I expect somebody doesn't :lol:


That is true, I just can't see why you wouldn't like them as they're fun in my opinion :tongue:


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by justinawe
Why not smash C4 as well? :sly:


Chemistry I want to prioritise in a way... Although knowing me, I'll put C4 first.

It's hard though :frown:

What's Tan(2x) equivalent to? Easy way to remember
Original post by L'Evil Fish
Chemistry I want to prioritise in a way... Although knowing me, I'll put C4 first.

It's hard though :frown:

What's Tan(2x) equivalent to? Easy way to remember

2tan(x)1tan2(x)\dfrac{2\tan(x)}{1-\tan^2(x)}
Not sure about an easy way :laugh:
Original post by L'Evil Fish
Chemistry I want to prioritise in a way... Although knowing me, I'll put C4 first.

It's hard though :frown:

What's Tan(2x) equivalent to? Easy way to remember


Just use the formula in the booklet where both A and B are x :smile:


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by L'Evil Fish
Chemistry I want to prioritise in a way... Although knowing me, I'll put C4 first.

It's hard though :frown:

What's Tan(2x) equivalent to? Easy way to remember


I just derive it from the addition formula in the formulae booklet :holmes:
Original post by joostan
2tan(x)1tan2(x)\dfrac{2\tan(x)}{1-\tan^2(x)}
Not sure about an easy way :laugh:

I'll remember that now :tongue:
Original post by MathsNerd1
Just use the formula in the booklet where both A and B are x :smile:


Posted from TSR Mobile

I've never used a formula booklet :/
Original post by justinawe
I just derive it from the addition formula in the formulae booklet :holmes:

As above.
Original post by L'Evil Fish
I'll remember that now :tongue:

I've never used a formula booklet :/

As above.

I just remember the formula for tan(A+B) then work it out, after a couple of times you just remember these things :tongue:

Spoiler

Original post by L'Evil Fish
I'll remember that now :tongue:

I've never used a formula booklet :/

As above.


Then use it now :sly:
Original post by joostan
I just remember the formula for tan(A+B) then work it out, after a couple of times you just remember these things :tongue:

Spoiler


I use the calculations :colonhash:
Original post by justinawe
Then use it now :sly:


I don't have one :redface:

I always have to derive my inverse trig from first principles as a result...
Original post by L'Evil Fish
I use the calculations :colonhash:
I don't have one :redface:
I always have to derive my inverse trig from first principles as a result...


Inverse trig?

So if I asked:
For a random variable XB(20,0.5)X \approx B(20,0.5)
Find:
P(X18)P(X \leq 18)
You'd do P(X=0)+P(X=1)+...+P(X=18) P(X=0) + P(X=1) + . . . + P(X=18)? :eek:

EDIT: Can't seem to get the tilda so I used approx :s-smilie:
(edited 10 years ago)
Reply 1937
Hi can someone help me with S2 hypothesis testing please.






I done the part to the get the first 3 marks but im not seeing where to get the 2 and the 10.

I would assume P(X<=A) < 0.025 but I dont know to go from there.
Original post by joostan
Inverse trig?

So if I asked:
For a random variable XB(20,0.5)X \approx B(20,0.5)
Find:
P(X18)P(X \leq 18)
You'd do P(X=0)+P(X=1)+...+P(X=18) P(X=0) + P(X=1) + . . . + P(X=18)? :eek:


Like for two marks if they ask:

Differentiate sin^-1(7x) I do it from scratch

Yeah :/ it's never that high though, most I've done is... About 6 of them
Reply 1939
Original post by joostan
Haha :smile:
Here's a nice logs question.
Show that the solution for x in the equation.
6x=5×9x6^x = 5 \times 9^x
Can be written as x=log3(5)log3(2)1x=\dfrac{\log_3(5)}{\log_3(2)-1}


Okays thank youu :biggrin: I'll try it then post it :smile:

Latest

Trending

Trending