You are Here: Home >< Maths

# NM Errors Exam question Watch

1. MEI NM Jan 09

For part i) abs error = 0.00033648912, rel error = 0.00035222053

I don't understand part ii), i looked in mark scheme and they equal kx^4 to the error from part i) and then work out k. But I don't understand the logic behind it whatsoever, why do they equal kx^4 to the error?
2. when x= 0.3, the absolute error (or the key point - the "missing bit in the more accurate approximation") is goint to equal the addition of the term

(the first 2 terms are the start of the Maclaurin series for cos(x), and 2 terms isn`t very accurate).

you discover in 1) that there`s an error in the approximation, and in 2) this error is reduced by introducing a certain multiple of the next term in the series - (k)x^4 - which, if you want a better approximation, has to be equal to the error.

so, (straightforward evaluation)

and in 2), result above in 2) = (i.e. error = added term so that error in new calculation is as close to zero as we can get it): (=> k = 0.0415419 (which = 0.997005/24 where 24 is the numerator in the 3rd term of the mac series)

(EDITED)

below, the purple graph is cos(x), the other the approximmation for small x with the value of k - seems to be accurate up to just before 1.5708 = Pi/2 rads - the first approximation is only accurate to about 0.5 rads)
Attached Images

3. (Original post by Hasufel)
when x= 0.3, the absolute error (or the key point - the "missing bit in the more accurate approximation") is goint to equal the addition of the term

(the first 2 terms are the start of the Maclaurin series for cos(x), and 2 terms isn`t very accurate).

you discover in 1) that there`s an error in the approximation, and in 2) this error is reduced by introducing a certain multiple of the next term in the series - (k)x^4 - which, if you want a better approximation, has to be equal to the error.

so, (straightforward evaluation)

and in 2), result above in 2) = (i.e. error = added term so that error in new calculation = 0): (=> k = 0.0415419 (which = 0.997005/24 where 24 is the numerator in the 3rd term of the mac series)

(EDITED)

below, the purple graph is cos(x), the other the approximmation for small x with the value of k - seems to be accurate up to about 1.5708 = Pi/2 rads)
Thank you for taking time to write a long informational post! That clears it up, thank you very much!

TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Updated: May 16, 2013
Today on TSR

### Luxury Dublin hotel bans ALL influencers

Discussions on TSR

• Latest
• ## See more of what you like on The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

• Poll
Useful resources

### Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

### How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

### Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

## Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups
Discussions on TSR

• Latest
• ## See more of what you like on The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

• The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE