Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    Name:  tripos question.png
Views: 477
Size:  22.2 KB

    Okay I get the principles behind these questions but I'm am finding the algebra difficult. I can prove the first part by taking the determinant of the Hessian but judging by the wording of the question this method won't get the highest marks. Basically if I do it their way I get a quadratic form of the form (d1)^2*fxx +(2d1d2)fxy + (d2)^2*fyy. Clearly the third and last term are negative and the middle one is positive but how do I show that the modulus of the outer terms is larger than the modulus of the middle term? For the other parts again I understand the principles but am not sure about the maths. According to examiner reports this wasn't a well answered question (it's a short answer question so we don't get long so long algebra is annoying!).
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by stefl14)
    Name:  tripos question.png
Views: 477
Size:  22.2 KB

    Okay I get the principles behind these questions but I'm am finding the algebra difficult. I can prove the first part by taking the determinant of the Hessian but judging by the wording of the question this method won't get the highest marks. Basically if I do it their way I get a quadratic form of the form (d1)^2*fxx +(2d1d2)fxy + (d2)^2*fyy. Clearly the third and last term are negative and the middle one is positive but how do I show that the modulus of the outer terms is larger than the modulus of the middle term? For the other parts again I understand the principles but am not sure about the maths. According to examiner reports this wasn't a well answered question (it's a short answer question so we don't get long so long algebra is annoying!).
    Can you be a bit more specific about what you're having issues with?

    For part a), one way to prove the question is to explicitly find the Hessian, and compute d'Hd for an arbitrary vector d
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Mark13)
    Can you be a bit more specific about what you're having issues with?

    For part a), one way to prove the question is to explicitly find the Hessian, and compute d'Hd for an arbitrary vector d
    That's what I did do as I say. The problem is I get the quadratic form mentioned after expanding it out and cant show that the quadratic form is strictly less than zero. As I said I am able to prove that it's strictly concave by the determinant method but the wording of the question suggests that's not what they're looking for.
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Would you rather give up salt or pepper?
    Useful resources

    Make your revision easier

    Maths

    Maths Forum posting guidelines

    Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

    Equations

    How to use LaTex

    Writing equations the easy way

    Student revising

    Study habits of A* students

    Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

    Study Planner

    Create your own Study Planner

    Never miss a deadline again

    Polling station sign

    Thinking about a maths degree?

    Chat with other maths applicants

    Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

    Groups associated with this forum:

    View associated groups
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Write a reply...
    Reply
    Hide
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.