Did you actually read the article?
They dropped non-fused bombs, well away from the coral and in deep water, so they could land safely after an aborted training mission, which whist regrettable in itself is the least destructive course of action that they could have taken. What would you have had them do, crash on landing with half a tonne of explosives each, just ready to cook off?
Misleading headline, causing a fuss over nothing. Inert bombs that didn't actually hit the reef area, would have been a lot worse if the bombs hadn't been jettisoned and the Harrier's had been lost.
You clearly haven't read the article.
The bombs could have easily went off.
This is TSR. Don't let facts get in the way of some hatred.
They're not bombs. They're inert.
Basically, they're shaped lumps of concrete. Absolutely no explosives whatsoever.