Could someone walk me through some idealisations made in the theory behind the simple harmonic oscillator? I know friction is ignored, but could you explain some others too please?
Could someone walk me through some idealisations made in the theory behind the simple harmonic oscillator? I know friction is ignored, but could you explain some others too please?
Thanks
SHM refers to anything with a sinusoidal type periodic function describing the motion.
Therefore, anything that alters the amplitude of the function is a deviation from the ideal and is dependent on the application.
i.e. energy losses caused by friction, air resistance, heat transfer, sound, em radiation etc. etc.
Then, if SHO misses out things like friction, air resistance ... then why do scientists rely on it?
SHM is the 'ideal' case oscillator. It's only valid for text book explanations describing perfect oscillations and to describe the oscillation frequency and it's relationship to physical properties in as simple way as possible. It's used to understand how the oscillations are sustained, that frequency is independent of amplitude.
In practice all oscillators are damped since they experience energy losses as previously described. The simple oscillator equations must therefore be modified to account for these losses. In this case, the amplitude of oscillation can only be maintained by an equal but opposite driving force which exactly compensates the damping.