Measure under your bust in inches. That's your band size. Then measure your boobs when you're leant over. Difference in inches = cup size. So say you were 30 inches under your bust and 36 over you'd be a 30E. Obviously this doesn't work for everyone but it's a good starting point. If a 30 band felt too tight a bigger band/smaller cup could be substituted (eg 32DD).
Measure under your bust in inches. That's your band size. Then measure your boobs when you're leant over. Difference in inches = cup size. So say you were 30 inches under your bust and 36 over you'd be a 30E. Obviously this doesn't work for everyone but it's a good starting point. If a 30 band felt too tight a bigger band/smaller cup could be substituted (eg 32DD).
Yeah I gathered that! Hence I went with a D! I sometimes find the 34s more comfortable on the back so I'll try a 32 f or a 34 e damn think my cost of bras have tripled!
How did you even come to that conclusion? I was pointing out, that they are the point of the thread, hence the title. So why are we arguing about small/large/average c/d/e etc.
Have you seen the one who tried to philosophically pick apart my argument?! What the ****? I don't get why some people get so annoyed on this
Small was the wrong word, average would have been better, I guess everything seems small to me
I've even taken pictures of me in a bad bra and a lovely one and annotated them to prove my point, I'm this close (does tiny penis hand sign) to posting them
Sorry Tyrion, but logically he/she was completely right - small and large are 100% subjective!
But yeah, I agree with everything else you've said :P
Shops really should stop shoving everyone into sizes that don't fit, which I'm guessing they usually do because they don't stock any 'larger' sizes... But sadly they are stuck, without the stock or incentive to start doing it properly and people actually think they are the wrong size which doesn't help.
Problem is it makes it so hard to actually get a size that fits if you fall outside the ~5 sizes that are available...
Have you seen the one who tried to philosophically pick apart my argument?! What the ****? I don't get why some people get so annoyed on this
Small was the wrong word, average would have been better, I guess everything seems small to me
I've even taken pictures of me in a bad bra and a lovely one and annotated them to prove my point, I'm this close (does tiny penis hand sign) to posting them
To be clear, Tyrion.
I know that you are well informed about bra sizing. I know that many, many women are wearing the wrong size, and as a 30F, it too drives me crazy that I can't find my size in a lot of cheaper stores.
I was not arguing with you on any of these points.
I was simply politely inquiring what your justification is for thinking an above average size (on an admittedly imperfect scale) classifies as small. You went on to argue a completely absurd definition of small and large, and seemed baffled by the difference between objective and subjective. I now see that your justification for this is that you are comparing to your own breasts - which congratulations, are large, but we don't need to see pictures of them to prove your point, you just wanted to post them.
I hope to God you never go into statistics or any form of science - and please, I don't appreciate the passive aggressive remarks about me, just because I proved you wrong.
How did you even come to that conclusion? I was pointing out, that they are the point of the thread, hence the title. So why are we arguing about small/large/average c/d/e etc.
I wasn't asking about your orientation? You asked me 'are you attracted to them on other girls?' Or something along those lines, you're making no sense