The Student Room Group

Recent Law Grad, chance of securing a TC

Hi all,

This is another boring rate my chances thread, sorry to bore you. Well my situation is I achieved ABB for my A-levels and graduated two months ago with a 2:1 (66%) from Oxford Brookes University. I have no legal experience to date, although I have tried and I do find it difficult to secure informal work experience. I am due to start a job as PPI case Handler at the end of this month however. I was wondering what type of things I could do to improve my chances of securing a TC in the upcoming round. I have failed two rounds now, any suggestions will be welcome taking into consideration my situation. Also any idea as to whether securing a TC would be realistic would also be very welcome, I entertain harsh truths.

Cheers

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1
Original post by yomi91
Hi all,

This is another boring rate my chances thread, sorry to bore you. Well my situation is I achieved ABB for my A-levels and graduated two months ago with a 2:1 (66%) from Oxford Brookes University. I have no legal experience to date, although I have tried and I do find it difficult to secure informal work experience. I am due to start a job as PPI case Handler at the end of this month however. I was wondering what type of things I could do to improve my chances of securing a TC in the upcoming round. I have failed two rounds now, any suggestions will be welcome taking into consideration my situation. Also any idea as to whether securing a TC would be realistic would also be very welcome, I entertain harsh truths.

Cheers


Rather depends on what sort of firm you're aiming for?


Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 2
Original post by chalks
Rather depends on what sort of firm you're aiming for?


Posted from TSR Mobile


Sorry, I forgot to mention what sort of firm I'm aiming for. I hope to work at a mid-size commercial law firm. I hope that helps.
hi there

I would say, you are not going to get a TC unless you get some legal experience. Why don't you do any legal-type voluntary work?
Reply 4
Original post by blabbermonkey
You need to get some work experience- PPI case handler is a positive start, but look at more formal placements like vacation schemes or try and weasel some partner shadowing.

Your Alevel grades are a bit of a potential headache as some firms (not all of course) have automatic filters that are often AAB. You're going to have to make sure you avoid those firms as you'd just be wasting your time by applying.

When you say 'mid size commercial firm' are we talking a regional firm or one in the City?


Hi Blabbermonkey

Thanks or your reply, I was looking at potentially doing a vacation scheme, which will hopefully lead onto me securing a TC. However I was unsure as a graduate whether it is still possible to get a vac scheme as they are usual for penultimate and final year students.

My ABB is potentially a problem and it has limited the number of firms I can apply to. Also wen I say 'mid size commercial firm' I am talking one in the city, since ideally I would like to stay in London.

Cheers
Reply 5
Original post by happyinthehaze
hi there

I would say, you are not going to get a TC unless you get some legal experience. Why don't you do any legal-type voluntary work?


Thanks for your reply, could this be any type of work experience? or should it be ideally be work experience in a commercial law firm. Since ultimately it is my goal to work as a commercial lawyer.
Reply 6
Original post by blabbermonkey
Quite a few firms now take graduates on their vac schemes- I've met a number myself. Just email their HR's to find out their position on this so you don't find you're wasting time on applications.

I think given the ABB you really face an uphill struggle with City firms. Working as a paralegal in the hope of getting a training contract at the end is probably your best bet I think as you just won't stand out compared to all the other applicants for straight training contracts.


Thanks for the advice mate. How about if I secure a vac scheme would you say thats a decent bet?
(edited 10 years ago)
Reply 7
Original post by blabbermonkey
If you can get a vac scheme there are usually good odds of getting a job off the back of it. Issue is they are often even more competitive number wise than training contracts so you're going to have to find a way to make yourself stand out. Do you/relatives have any contacts that may be able to help swing you an interview at a firm? It's a sad reality that surprising numbers of people get interviews for such things on the back of who they know still.


Unfortunately my family do not have such contacts, its sad that the profession I want to have a taste of is so difficult to experience. I guess I may have to draw up a contingency plan, should I be unable to secure a vac scheme.
Reply 8
Original post by yomi91
Hi all,

This is another boring rate my chances thread, sorry to bore you. Well my situation is I achieved ABB for my A-levels and graduated two months ago with a 2:1 (66%) from Oxford Brookes University. I have no legal experience to date, although I have tried and I do find it difficult to secure informal work experience. I am due to start a job as PPI case Handler at the end of this month however. I was wondering what type of things I could do to improve my chances of securing a TC in the upcoming round. I have failed two rounds now, any suggestions will be welcome taking into consideration my situation. Also any idea as to whether securing a TC would be realistic would also be very welcome, I entertain harsh truths.

Cheers


I think your chances are probably below average to slim for the following reasons.

- Your A-level results, whilst strong compared to the majority of the student population, are probably below the norm for applicants to City firms (whether MC, SC or mid-level).

- Your Uni is not one of the more recognised institutions for Law (although you graduated with a strong result).

- You have no legal experience which suggests to recruiters that either (a) you were unsucessful in your vac scheme applications which sends a particular message or (b) you didn't apply for them which suggests a lack of commitment to this area of the profession.

- You have already been unsuccessful through two rounds of applications. That suggests that firms aren't particularly interested in what you have to sell them. You can improve your position, but I'm afraid I think you're going to struggle to overcome the points above.

The very sad reality is that universities are churning out hundreds, if not thousands, of graduates like you. Good, bright, ambitious potential lawyers with some good A-Level results, good degree results and some indication that they're a well-rounded character. Unfortunately, the City firms are in the driving seat. They can afford to be ridiculously picky given the vast numbers of applicants in front of them, and choose the stand-outs.

Can I ask what it is about commercial law that appeals to you, given that you haven't had any legal work experience? How do you answer the "Why us" questions in the application forms?

Chalks.
Reply 9
Original post by chalks
I think your chances are probably below average to slim for the following reasons.

- Your A-level results, whilst strong compared to the majority of the student population, are probably below the norm for applicants to City firms (whether MC, SC or mid-level).

- Your Uni is not one of the more recognised institutions for Law (although you graduated with a strong result).

- You have no legal experience which suggests to recruiters that either (a) you were unsucessful in your vac scheme applications which sends a particular message or (b) you didn't apply for them which suggests a lack of commitment to this area of the profession.

- You have already been unsuccessful through two rounds of applications. That suggests that firms aren't particularly interested in what you have to sell them. You can improve your position, but I'm afraid I think you're going to struggle to overcome the points above.

The very sad reality is that universities are churning out hundreds, if not thousands, of graduates like you. Good, bright, ambitious potential lawyers with some good A-Level results, good degree results and some indication that they're a well-rounded character. Unfortunately, the City firms are in the driving seat. They can afford to be ridiculously picky given the vast numbers of applicants in front of them, and choose the stand-outs.

Can I ask what it is about commercial law that appeals to you, given that you haven't had any legal work experience? How do you answer the "Why us" questions in the application forms?

Chalks.


Thank you Chalks for your insightful post.

Commercial law appeals to me, mainly because of the opportunities one would have to work with large corporations who are at the forefront of our economy. Its the scale of the work that interests me. Also I am interested in commerce, this stemmed from my parents once owning a restaurant and led me to try and implement a few business ideas I had. I enjoy the idea that I can help businesses devise successful plans to outperform their competitors. The truth is however I am not 100% sure I would enjoy working as a commercial lawyer, until I have some sort of experience.

Usually I answer 'Why us' questions by giving 3-4 reasons and expanding on them. For example I may say I am interested in applying for XYZ firm because of its wide ranging practice, I would then expand on this and state how this feature of the firm would benefit me. For example I may say the firm having a wide practice would enable me enjoy a more varied training experience, enabling me to make a more informed decision as to which area of practice I would like to specialise in.

I hope I have answered your questions.

Cheers.
Hi Yomi91

There are several elements you can't do a lot about - your uni, results etc, but you CAN sort out your work experience.

Firms want to see, ideally, both types: normal work experience and law work experience. Both types demonstrate different skills and experience you have plus you really need to put the hours in to show firms that you are serious about wanting to do law.

Firms also want to know that you actually will want to stay in the areas of law that they practice in - for example, if you were to find out, while doing your TC, that you didn't want to work there after all, you represent something of a dead loss for them.

I do think you can do something about your lack of law work experience - it does not need to be at a top commercial firm. If you don't, then you will appear to lack initiative or drive.

What you say about your business experience is interesting - did any of your initiatives pay off?

I have a hunch that you should sit down and list ten aspects of why you think you want to get into commercial law - perhaps you might actually find you are suited to another career altogether?

Also, consider whether you really need to work for the city firms - I believe there is a lot more to law than this and also lots of commercial-type opportunities in other firms. All businesses want to do well but they don't all use city lawyers.

Lastly, think about your 'why this firm' section - you need to be telling the firms a) why you want to work for them specifically and b) why it is they should employ you. This means you need to have a lot of skills and experience they can use. You have listed why the firm can benefit you, but you have not listed why it is you can be of benefit to the firm.

I would seriously beef up your law CV and open up the parameters of where you are trying to go to. Perhaps check out the CVs of successful trainee solicitors on firms' website and ask yourself, what would you put in your own trainee biog?
Reply 11
Original post by yomi91
Thank you Chalks for your insightful post.

Commercial law appeals to me, mainly because of the opportunities one would have to work with large corporations who are at the forefront of our economy. Its the scale of the work that interests me. Also I am interested in commerce, this stemmed from my parents once owning a restaurant and led me to try and implement a few business ideas I had. I enjoy the idea that I can help businesses devise successful plans to outperform their competitors. The truth is however I am not 100% sure I would enjoy working as a commercial lawyer, until I have some sort of experience.

Usually I answer 'Why us' questions by giving 3-4 reasons and expanding on them. For example I may say I am interested in applying for XYZ firm because of its wide ranging practice, I would then expand on this and state how this feature of the firm would benefit me. For example I may say the firm having a wide practice would enable me enjoy a more varied training experience, enabling me to make a more informed decision as to which area of practice I would like to specialise in.

I hope I have answered your questions.


How many of those would use a "mid-sized" firm?
Reply 12
Original post by Ethereal
How many of those would use a "mid-sized" firm?


I have seen a number of mid size firms who provide services to a range of large corporations. Or maybe I am wrong?
Reply 13
Original post by yomi91
I have seen a number of mid size firms who provide services to a range of large corporations. Or maybe I am wrong?


I just wouldn't think a large corporation at the forefront of the economy would use mid-sized firms but I suppose it depends on what you think is a large corporation and what you think is the forefront of the economy ...
Reply 14
Original post by Ethereal
I just wouldn't think a large corporation at the forefront of the economy would use mid-sized firms but I suppose it depends on what you think is a large corporation and what you think is the forefront of the economy ...


I understand, okay let me rephrase that sentence to simply large corporations.
Reply 15
Original post by Ethereal
How many of those would use a "mid-sized" firm?


Suppose it depends on what we mean by 'mid-sized'. My firm is in the 30s in the UK by turnover but we act for all the big banks in a variety of smaller matters.

Don't get me wrong, they use the bigger/more specialist firms etc for their real legal work, but pass medium/small pieces of litigation and security reviews to smaller firms in order to keep overheads down.


Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 16
Original post by Key123
Suppose it depends on what we mean by 'mid-sized'. My firm is in the 30s in the UK by turnover but we act for all the big banks in a variety of smaller matters.

Don't get me wrong, they use the bigger/more specialist firms etc for their real legal work, but pass medium/small pieces of litigation and security reviews to smaller firms in order to keep overheads down.


Posted from TSR Mobile


I can see that happening, but that doesn't chime with why the OP said they want to work in mid-sized firms doing commercial work. I guess what I was hinting at was that if the OP is putting that in apps it won't help
Reply 17
Original post by Ethereal
I can see that happening, but that doesn't chime with why the OP said they want to work in mid-sized firms doing commercial work. I guess what I was hinting at was that if the OP is putting that in apps it won't help


I think I'd probably agree with that hint.



Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 18
Original post by Key123
I think I'd probably agree with that hint.



Posted from TSR Mobile


I will take that advice on board cheers!
Reply 19
Original post by yomi91
I will take that advice on board cheers!


Well, I'd stress that my opinion might not carry much weight. I'm only a trainee and have never conducted interviews.

What I have picked up through my own application experience and subsequent conversations with our recruiters (at a mid size national commercial) is that they aren't impressed with 'big money' or 'big power'.

They would rather hear about your interest in getting stuck into problems to assist businesses than about your excitement at working for X massive corporation which will only generate a fraction of the firm's actual fee income.


Posted from TSR Mobile

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending