Law Synoptic Exam - 21st June!!!! Law Crew Only hehe!!

As a possible case i'm thinking Cocoran v Anderton and as a possible question 3 definition of a 'building', that's the first thing that comes to mind.
Any other suggestions??
They could ask us other questions like one on Collins but on on eof the previous one the've already asked something on entry and tresppass.

As a possible case i'm thinking Cocoran v Anderton and as a possible question 3 definition of a 'building', that's the first thing that comes to mind.
Any other suggestions??
They could ask us other questions like one on Collins but on on eof the previous one the've already asked something on entry and tresppass.

i was thinking Dawson, what could amount to force.
Also i was thinking the paper could mainly focus on robbery coz for the past 2 years its been burglary but the majority of worthwhile questions are burglary so i duno

cases that need to be learnt, dicussed, debated what ever you like to call it :
ROBBERY
Robinson
Forester
Corcoran v Anderton
Dawson and James
Clouden
Smith v Desmond
Hale

BURGLARY
AG's ref 1979
O'Leary
Walkington
Seekings and Gould
Liang
Manning
Jones and Smith
Collins
Brown
Ryan

THEFT
Morris
Lawrence
Hinks
Kelly and Lindsay
Hall
Wain
Turner
AG ref 1985
Ghosh
Velumyl
Lloyde



right i have got a table for burglary and robbery if you want me to put it up?

i was thinking Dawson, what could amount to force.
Also i was thinking the paper could mainly focus on robbery coz for the past 2 years its been burglary but the majority of worthwhile questions are burglary so i duno

hey people...whatta day today has been!!

i completely f*cd up that exam, even thoughht i revised duress so much! i feel so stupid arghh am sooo annoyed with myself. just need to really really prove myself in the synoptic!!! arghh

whats the table you have got for robbery lulu?

xxx

don't worry I feel exactly the same! I screwed up before I even began by breaking my glasses and losing my pencil case Just put it out of your mind and go all out for the synoptic now. It's worth more so you can make it up with the marks. You've prob done better than you think anyway. xxx

Me and Danny5876 had a look at the past papers for the synoptic only an hour ago anbd came up with this:

Q 4 should be the easiest, with the mini problem questions, they're gonna be on burglary as far as i know, so that's good. In the past papers the scenarios are all REALLY and i mean REALLY similar!! there is only slight differences and they all include section 9 1 (a) and (b) so thats gonna be ok, its just piking up those little details that are hidden away.

Regarding the others, Q1 is gonna be ok i think, just think about the role of judges and what their role should be in relation to the rule of interpretation.
Q2 like i said COULD be on Cocoran v Anderton but thinking about it i dont see how a questions could be written about it because the only thing it created was that there was no requirement that D got away.
Q3 again COULD be on building as that's not been up before.

I like those predictions vincent! Ok so qestion 2 is a study of 1 of the 5 cases and I cnt remeber 1, I know Hale,Walkington,Cocoran v Andterton, Dawson. Whose the other???

The other was collins was it not???

For me i'll read the source tonight, with some commentary from the book i've got.
The tomorrow look at stat interp, and go into a bit of detail of the decision behind cases, bit more on robb and burg and that is al i can think of doing.
Anyubody got any other ideas on how to revise>> in a day might i add