This discussion is closed.
Howard
Badges: 3
Rep:
?
#261
Report 15 years ago
#261
(Original post by pkonline)
The point is that stats aren't objective because they need to be interpreted which brings in bias.
Well, save the production of statistics for political reasons I'd say that bare statistics are or should always be objective. And so would you. If you were preparing a thesis on some social phenomenon or another I could just about bet that one of the things you would do is collect some statistics to show the truth.

It is only if you have a predestined thesis in mind that I'd expect you to bend and pervert the statistics to match your argument.

Interpretation is another matter which of course is why people say that you can prove anything you want with statistics.
0
TheWolf
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#262
Report 15 years ago
#262
(Original post by Silus)
Thats because they are white **** sluts. They return to white men only when they have their first half-cast ******* and it's obvious that their ****** impregnator has no intention of working for a living and supporting the slut and her monkey child.
please dont use offensive words
0
Howard
Badges: 3
Rep:
?
#263
Report 15 years ago
#263
(Original post by TheWolf)
please dont use offensive words
I take it Silus isn't a big fan of inter-racial marriages.
0
riffraff
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#264
Report 15 years ago
#264
(Original post by Howard)
No it's not! It's just that they prefer black men to white men. How the hell is that racist?

I prefer white women to black women but I'd much prefer a black woman over an oriental asian woman. That's not racist; just personal preference.
if you mean it in the same way that, for example, a person might prefer to date blonds, then I don't think that is racist. however, if you mean it in the same way as one of my friends, who would not date a chinese person because of his nationality, I would say that is racist.
0
Kurdt Morello
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#265
Report 15 years ago
#265
inter-racial relationships are great - i have no problem with them. But i am dismayed that in this day and age we still cant look past colour, creed or race and just appreciate people for who they are and how they make us feel. Clearly even noticing that a relationship is 'inter-racial' is by its very nature judging a relationship by the races involved and therefore one's perspective is inherently racist - those who dont notice such things first before beauty and intelligence are free from racist views in my opinion.
0
FoxNewsRocks
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#266
Report 15 years ago
#266
(Original post by Kurdt Morello)
inter-racial relationships are great - i have no problem with them. But i am dismayed that in this day and age we still cant look past colour, creed or race and just appreciate people for who they are and how they make us feel. Clearly even noticing that a relationship is 'inter-racial' is by its very nature judging a relationship by the races involved and therefore one's perspective is inherently racist - those who dont notice such things first before beauty and intelligence are free from racist views in my opinion.

Another brainwashed follower of the powers that be? I know this is going to sound racist and if it offends anyone, then i apologize, but lets not beat around the bushes. If you can look at a black african and a white european and not see theres obvious differences other than skin color, then you are brainwashed. Theres many differences, I wont name them because they are obvious. Just because we are all on the same planet doesnt mean we were meant to interbreed. Nature doesnt interbreed, because they, whatever animal they are, are preserving themselves. If a human does the same thing, the lemmings and the non-whites call us racist. If having pride in my race is a crime, mark me guilty. I dont believe a mixed up human race is a good thing, like i said before, we would have been all made the same to begin with if it was meant to be. We were made different for reasons and if you wish to spoil your race whether it be black white or whatever, feel free to, but for christs sake stop preaching to people or calling them racist because they do not agree with your views on it.

The way you and some others speak about it, its quite close to some religious zealots pushing their religion onto others. I think we all know most obvious reasons white women tend to go with blacks. One reason being anatomy, another being money. Here in the US, you rarely see white men with a black woman other than in hollywood, and hollywood pushes inter-racialism and gayness onto everyone. Who voted to make multi-racialism the norm? Wasnt me, nor anyone i know. Its the owners of the media. But thats a whole different story for a different major issue that needs badly to be discussed about another race of people.

All that most intelligent people request is to be asked and heard on opinions of choice in how we proceed into the future but some have taken the position that its their duty to tell us what we should and shouldnt believe in.
But again i repeat, if you choose to be inter-racial, thats fine, just dont hold it against those of us that believe the opposite.
0
hitchhiker_13
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#267
Report 15 years ago
#267
(Original post by FoxNewsRocks)
If you can look at a black african and a white european and not see theres obvious differences other than skin color, then you are brainwashed. Theres many differences, I wont name them because they are obvious. .

Humour us.
0
Fleffzilla
Badges: 3
Rep:
?
#268
Report 15 years ago
#268
(Original post by FoxNewsRocks)
But again i repeat, if you choose to be inter-racial, thats fine, just dont hold it against those of us that believe the opposite.
Most people start holding it against others when it becomes violent though... I don't think anyone can be blamed for that.......

I'd like to mention that it is not just whites that are racist, many black people are too, you just don't hear about it as much...
0
FoxNewsRocks
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#269
Report 15 years ago
#269
(Original post by hitchhiker_13)
Humour us.

If you cannot see them, then theres no point in even disussing it with you. To start naming off obvious differences really would make someone sound racist and you will not use your tactics to try to make my, and others like mine, opinions into some farce. I do have a question for you hitchhiker_13, are you jewish?
0
Fleffzilla
Badges: 3
Rep:
?
#270
Report 15 years ago
#270
(Original post by FoxNewsRocks)
If you cannot see them, then theres no point in even disussing it with you.
The only obvious one to see is... erm.... oh! skin colour... which according to you isn't the only one, so... shed some light on these differences, what are they?!
0
hitchhiker_13
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#271
Report 15 years ago
#271
(Original post by FoxNewsRocks)
If you cannot see them, then theres no point in even disussing it with you. To start naming off obvious differences really would make someone sound racist and you will not use your tactics to try to make my, and others like mine, opinions into some farce. I do have a question for you hitchhiker_13, are you jewish?

No, I'm not Jewish. Why do you ask?
I really want to know what these differences are.
0
FoxNewsRocks
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#272
Report 15 years ago
#272
About being jewish, I was just curious really hitchhiker_13 due to your name.

(Original post by hitchhiker_13)
No, I'm not Jewish. Why do you ask?
I really want to know what these differences are.
As for the differences, since you obviously do not know how to do research on your own, nor make visible observations, these were retrieved from a paper I read in college in 1998. If you have questions about any of them then you can do the research for yourself by studying Anatomy 101. I usually dont relent to people like yourself to prove obvious points, but this time i will make an exception. This is no way is meant to be derogatory to any blacks, its just facts.

* The hair is black, crispy, and "woolly" in texture, it is flat and elliptical with no central canal or duct like the hair of Europeans.

* The nose is thick, broad and flat, often turned up nostrils exposing the red inner lining of the mucous membrane similar to an primate.

* The arms and legs of the Negro are relatively longer than the European. The humerus is a trifle shorter and the forearm longer thereby approximating the simian form.

* The eyes are prominent, iris black and the orbits large. The eye often has a yellowish sclerotic coat over it like that of a primate.

* The Negro has a shorter trunk, the cross-section of the chest is more circular than whites. The pelvis is narrower and longer as it is in primates.

* The mouth is wide with very thick, large and protruding lips.

* Negro skin has a thick superficial sandy layer which resists scratching and impedes the penetration of germs.

* The Negro has a larger and shorter neck akin to that of anthropoids.

* The cranial sutures are more simple than in the white type and close together earlier.

* The ears are roundish, rather small, standing somewhat high and detached thus approaching the simian form.

* The Negro is more powerfully developed from the pelvis down and the white more powerfully developed in the chest.

* The jaw is larger and stronger and protrudes outward which, along with lower retreating forehead, gives a facial angle of 68 to 70 degrees as opposed to a facial angle of 80 to 82 degrees for Europeans.

* The hands and fingers are proportionally narrower and longer. The wrist and ankles are shorter and more robust.

* The frontal and paricial bones of the cranium are less excavated and less capacious. The skull is thicker especially on the sides.

* The brain of the Negro on the average is 9 to 20% smaller than whites.

* The teeth are larger and are wider apart than in the white race.

* The three curvatures of the spine are less pronounced in the Negro than in the white and thus more characteristic of a primate.

* The femur of the Negro is less oblique, the tibia (shin bone) more curved and bent forward, the calf of the leg high and but little developed.

* The heel is broad and projecting, the foot long and broad but slightly arched causing flat soles, the great toe is shorter than in the white.

* The two bones proper of the nose are occasionally united, as in primates.



Enjoy.
0
What's Chico Time Precious?
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#273
Report 15 years ago
#273
(Original post by FoxNewsRocks)

1) The humerus is a trifle shorter and the forearm longer thereby approximating the simian form.

2) The Negro has a shorter trunk

3) The brain of the Negro on the average is 9 to 20% smaller than whites.
1: You used the word trifle in a college paper?

2: :confused:

3) Really, i didnt honestly know that or believe it, *goes and looks on t'net.*
0
GH
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#274
Report 15 years ago
#274
If it says "Average", then don't trust the statement.
0
FoxNewsRocks
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#275
Report 15 years ago
#275
(Original post by Absolution)
1: You used the word trifle in a college paper?

2: :confused:

3) Really, i didnt honestly know that or believe it, *goes and looks on t'net.*


FoxNewsRocks said:
"As for the differences, since you obviously do not know how to do research on your own, nor make visible observations, these were retrieved from a paper I read in college in 1998."

notice the words "read in college" ? I did not write them. All i did was retrieve them from my records and spent 30 mins typing them out for you to pick something silly to argue over, like the word trifle.

I would suggest seeking information at your school biology dept. if possible, provided it isnt a PC left wing lies pusher.
0
What's Chico Time Precious?
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#276
Report 15 years ago
#276
(Original post by FoxNewsRocks)
FoxNewsRocks said:

notice the words "read in college" ?
It said wrote in college before you edited it.

To dispute the obvious is to show your brainwashing into believing things
against nature.

I am not disputing anything, merely questioning what you hand me is a sign of not being brainwashed, in that i am aware enough to make decisions about what to believe, rather than taking whatever you have written as gospel.
0
FoxNewsRocks
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#277
Report 15 years ago
#277
yes i made a typo, i put "wrote" instead of "read". But i did catch the error within 10 seconds of posting it so you must have awesome timing. I was in a hurry. My apologies. And i removed the last comment i made from my last post, it was not called for and was a bit harsh.
0
Howard
Badges: 3
Rep:
?
#278
Report 15 years ago
#278
(Original post by piginapoke)
Animals do interbreed within reason. Sometimes it works sometimes it doesn't (infertile offspring etc). The problem with applying that principle to humans is that the various races aren't a different species at all, just slight variations on a single species, so breeding is no problem between any race biologically. So to say avoiding mixed race relationships is to preserve the species is rubbish; its just a matter of choice based on many other factors.

Having pride in one's race is on a par with patriotism - irrational, as its based on nothing more than an accident of birth.
I think patriotism is a good thing. I also think it's based on much more than accident of birth. Why are people patriotic? History, culture, shared experiences, shared sense of belonging etc. Not just birth. I think when all these things are considered patriotism is an extremely rational expression.
0
Howard
Badges: 3
Rep:
?
#279
Report 15 years ago
#279
(Original post by piginapoke)
Ah but I didn't say it was bad, just irrational, as a means of proving my point that avoiding mixed race relationships based on preservation of the species is irrational; thanks for undermining my point
Always a pleasure.
0
randdom
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#280
Report 15 years ago
#280
(Original post by FoxNewsRocks)
Just because we are all on the same planet doesnt mean we were meant to interbreed. Nature doesnt interbreed, because they, whatever animal they are, are preserving themselves. If a human does the same thing, the lemmings and the non-whites call us racist.
Ok so in nature you don't see a monkey breeding with a lion and that is because they are from different speicies so can't produce viable younge. Look at the cats a black cat and a tabby cat can breed and they have different skin and coat colour. So what is the difference? Interbreeding of different colours within a species does happen.
0
X
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Regarding Ofqual's most recent update, do you think you will be given a fair grade this summer?

Yes (269)
33.96%
No (523)
66.04%

Watched Threads

View All