Is this indicative of BBC anti-Israel bias?

OK thanks for agreeing.

Thanks for whining like a baby while 600,000 Jews (and counting) continue to live in Judea and Samaria regardless of what you say.

""

I've run out of rep to give, but you're correct.

They also supported Saddam's invasion of Kuwait even though Kuwait had allowed many 'palestinians' in to work. Thousands were thrown out after the war was over.

Arafat and his gang were allowed into Jordan. They proceeded to try and overthrow the King. The cheeky little savages even set up checkpoints in Jordan. Thousands of them were killed when the Jordanians got fed up and threw them out.

Of course as you mentioned they hijacked Lebanon, used it as a launchpad for attacks against Israel and kicked off the Lebanese civil war.

They have taken part in attacks against Egyptians even though Egyptians have been their biggest supporters.

They were given free reign by Assad to operate from Syria against Israel since 1988. Planning suicide attacks from Damascus. As soon as the civil war kicked off, they hedged their bets and deserted Assad who had helped them all these years.



They are just inherent back-stabbers and you can be friends with one for years - he'll still slit your throat without hesitation if it gains him anything.

Awful.

Never ever trust them.

I have no problem with them living there, just as long as they are inclusive.

As part of Oslo Accords, 60% of the West Bank (Area C) should be under full Israeli military and civil control. Only 2% of West Bank Palestinians live in this area. Perhaps Israel should annex Area C and build proper cities?

They practically are, just in a slow way.

This is so exciting

Why?

x

Nobody wants another terror state, especially after Hillary and 0bong0's Arab Spring.

I'm confused.

Can you please connect all of your thoughts together into constructive arguments?

Look at all these Arab countries that are crumbling.. from Northern Africa to the borders of Iran, these nationalities that were created by Britain and France in Sykes-Picot (1916) and San Remo (1920) are proving to be artificial in the face of the sectarian conflict and the situation on the ground that has existed for hundreds of years. Mark my words, by the time these wars and uprisings end, the borders that exist today (on paper that is) will not be the same.

The Palestinians have always been a part of the larger Arab community; in terms of history, culture, language and ethnicity they are not in any way a separate group of people than their neighbors. 70% of Jordan is palestinian Arabs. In fact the term "Palestinian people" was first used in 1964, and their is the Jordanian flag without its star, created in 1988.

Now why do you want another failed state that will bring even more instability to the region? already the PA and Hamas are in a fight.

The Mandate for Palestine called for only one Arab state - that state today is called Jordan. Why do we suddenly need another one?

Israel withdrew its settlements from Gaza, and that only resulted in 14,000 rockets being shot at Israel. If Israel does anything foolish in the West Bank, you'll read the news every morning and hear of rocket attacks on Ben Gurion airport and Tel Aviv.

No more failed terrorist states.

Lebanon, Jordan and Egypt aren't failed states. They've had their problems but as nation-states they are functioning. You're probably right about Iraq and Syria. Why not just adhere to international law and allow the establishment of a state of Palestine? Or at the very least, allow all Palestinians in the West Bank Israeli citizenship and full rights as part of a greater Israel?

I disagree with the Palestinian culture and people point. They are definitely a separate Semitic entity to other Arab nations.

I don't care if they are biased against Israel.