The Student Room Group

ENB6 - Language Change and Lang Acquisition

Anyone else revising this now?

Thought I'd make a topic which got our notes together.

Here are some for now:

LANGUAGE ACQUISITION
Theorists

Cognitive - Jean Piaget - can only understand lang when you understand concept (e.g. can talk in past tense when you know about time)

Behaviourist - Skinner learn through imitation - doesn't explain where new sentences come from

Nativist - Chomsky - Language Acquisition Device (LAD) - works out what is/isn't acceptable lang use using innate programmed patterns (which are general). exact rules learnt through trial and error. His theory supports the fact that children around the world seem to develop at a similar pace, irrespective of race/culture/mother tongue. (This also 'defies' Skinner's model) Also, the fact that there is a universal grammar amongst all languages of the world. & the fact that children consistently create new forms of language that they would not have heard before.
* Conversely, John Macnamara - said that rather than having an in-built language device, children have an innate capacity to read meaning into social situations. It is this capacity that makes them capable of understanding and learning language, not the LAD.

Interactive - caretaker, motherese etc - slower pace than adult convo, simplified, repetition, short sentences, often caretaker asking 'where is___?', 'that's a___', tag questions to involve child ('isn't it?')

Example for importance of social interaction: Bard and Sachs. Studied a boy called 'Jim', who was son of two deaf parents. Although he was exposed to TV and radio, his speech development was severely retarded until he attended sessions with a speech therapist --> hence implying that human interaction is necessary, as Jim was obviously ready to talk, but without the social interaction with his therapist, he was unable to do so.

Katherine Nelson - found that 60% of childrens early word phrases contained nouns, then verbs, pre-mods and phatic and she also said that the nouns were more commonly things that surrounded the children i.e ball, mum, cat. Nelson also said that in Re-casts (e.g. Ben - "me ball" mum - "pass me the ball") children whose sentances were re-cast performed better at imitating sentances

Halliday is just the functions of child language, I remember them like RRIIIPH, like rest in peace:
* Representational - "I've got something to show you" - language showing how they feel, declarative
* Regulatory - "Do as I tell you" - requesting/asking for things
* Instrumental - "I want"- expressing needs/wants
* Interactional - "Me and you" - speaking to other, establishing personal contact
* Imaginative - "Let's pretend" - imaginative language, used with play, to create imaginary world. Crystal talks of 'phonological' function as playing with sound.
* Personal - "Here I come"- child expresses their feelings/expressing personal preferences
* Heuristic - "Tell me why"- uses language to explore environment/ seeking infomation

* Most commonly used in childrens language is instrumental and regulatory, which are learnt, along with interactional and personal, at a young age. Representational is used by 6-8+ year olds.



Possible way to get the theorists in:
maybe if you get a transcript of child speech, you could easily get in about caretaker speech. as for cognitive, you could get it in if a child is talkin about abstract ideas, cuz they'd only understand them if they understood the concept. behaviourists...maybe if a child was imitating in the convo, or saying something unusual that they've copied off someone? nativists... if a child is overextending the inflection -s to make feets - they've not finished learning thru trial and error yet? how does that sound...? perhaps if you can't link a theorist in cuz nothing matches them, you could point out how it DOESN'T support theorists too?


Features of child lang acq:

Holophrases - one word (12-18mths), then two-word stage (after 18mths), then telegraphic speech (after 2yrs) - sometimes grammatically correct but omit determiners like 'a' and 'the'

Underextension - 'car' only for family car, but not other cars

Overextension - 'car' for tractor, van, etc

Fis phenomenon - Berko and Brown - child pronounces fish as fis but when a parent asks if it is a fis, the child says no - when asked if it's a fish, child says yes. can understand a word without being able to pronounce it - comprehension before speech

Simplification - deletion, substitution

Intonation - Cruttenden - found children find it harder to recognise intonation

Questions - inflection often used at first to show it's a question, then question words learnt during 2nd yr, firstly what and where, then why, how and who. results in 'where daddy gone?' as they've not learnt auxiliary verb, 'has'. auxiliary verbs learnt 3rd yr, and how to form qus is learnt too (reverse subject and verb order). 'joe is here' --> 'is joe here?' but wh- words not always inverted correctly - 'why joe isn't here?' (hehe plagiarised my revision book for the examples, sorry!)

Critical period for learning - Cases about twins who were kept locked up by their family, but they were rescued young so developed normally. Feral children like Genie, who was forced not to talk, and hence only made limited lang progress as she is thought to have missed the critical period for learning lang. Two girls were found wolves in a wolves' den and had trouble learning to speak etc http://www.feralchildren.com/en/showchild.php?ch=kamala "After three years, Kamala had mastered a small vocabulary of about a dozen words. After several more years, her vocabulary had increased to about 40.To compare, a normal two-year-old child, at the peak of its language learning, would find it easy to pick up 40 new words in a single week. Also, Kamala's words were only partly-formed and her grammar stilted"

Stages of negatives:
* Aged 0-15months - Gestures are used to indicate a negative
* 15-18months - single words "no" "not" are used
* 2-2 1/2 yrs - "no" and "not" are used either at the beginning or end of a sentance e.g. "no eat" "going not"
* 3yrs - negatives are used with the correct syntax i.e. intergrated into the sentance
* 4/5/6yrs - more subtle negatives i.e hardly, are used, more "n't"'s as well, "can't" "won't" etc. Implied negatives are understood, i.e. "we'll go later"

Look at how much is said by each person, who controls what is being said, who takes the lead, pragmatics, social context, as well as the actual things that are being said

Check this website for developmental milestones in child lang: http://www.aboutourkids.org/aboutour/articles/looktalking.html




Written Child Language

Need fine motor skills in order to hold the pen and write evenly

Knowledge of letter shapes/patterns

Rules: top-bottom/left-right/'finger space'

Capitalisation and punctuation

Format of specific genres eg. for a letter there should be an address, date etc

Tense

Phonic spelling/look and say method

Stages in actually writing:
* 1. Palmer grip - used to make marks on the page (just like up and down lines)
* which leads to more conventional grip, where you can make more circular lines
* 2. Motor control - more circular again, leave gaps as though imitation text
* 3. Proto-letter formation - Begin to write name and letters, but the letter might be too big, or back-to-front

BM Kroll - He suggested that there are a number of stages that children go through:
* Stage 1- Prepatory Stage - Up to the age of 6
Child masters physical skills needed to write. Learns basic principles of spelling system.
* Stage 2 - Consolidation - Ages 6-8
Child writes like they speak. Short, declarative sentences common. Grammatically incomplete sentences. Long strings of sentences joined with simple conjunctions.
* Stage 3 - Differentiation Stage (8 - mid teens)
Child becomes more aware of differences between writing and speech. Increasing confidence. More complicated sentences and constructions.




Reading and Child Lang Acq

Children's books also relate to prominent aspects of a child's life, eg. school, family etc.

The higher up the reading scheme, the fewer pictures there are to aid pragmatics.

Reading skills

Reading schemes like 'Roger Red Hat'

The teaching of reading in schools

Phonics (analytic and synthetic)
* Synthetic - break the sounds into syllables - there is a representation/action for each sound, too. For eg, S = weave hand in an s shape, like a snake, and say ssssss
* Analytic - used in conjunction with other strategies, was the original method and doesn't break down words into such small units like synthetic.

Try thinking about how you learnt to read, perhaps you read 'Roger Red Hat' too! :smile:



What you look at in Lang Acquisition
This area of study is designed to teach candidates about the nature
and functions of language in the individual and social development of
humans. It will focus on some of the distinctive features of speech
and literacy development in children from 0 to 11 years who are
native users of English. These include:

The primacy of speech and the learning of the sound system

The links between the child’s desire to communicate needs and the
acquisition of phonology, lexis and grammar in order to achieve
purposes (pragmatics)

The significance of social interaction in language acquisition and
the development of innate structures to achieve, continue and
extend interpersonal communication (turn-taking, politeness rules,
implied meanings, specific contexts, social awareness and other
discourse patterns)

The connections between developments in children’s language and
their general conceptual development

The beginnings of reading and writing.



LANGUAGE CHANGE

Tips for answering Language Change Questions:

Stick to frameworks

Get as much context as you can in - eg look at the date and try to think what would have been happening at the time.

A key period is following the introduction of the printing press (1476) and the introduction of the first dictionary (1755 - Samuel Johnson). Also remember the grammar books that appeared at the time - the writers that tried to "fix" the language (Robert Lowth's Short Introduction to English Grammar was written 1762). All these had an influence on the language, and helped it to become standardised (slowly - remember it didn't all happen at once).



Where some English words have come from...

English is a Germanic language

Some words can be Latinate - tend to be the more fancy, scientific words, or ones to do with legal stuff...introduced mainly during the Renaissance to make the words sound more impressive

Norse words - tend to be things like "window" and "sky" - everyday outdoor objects

Saxon/Celtic words - words to do with family relationships?

French influence - along with Latinate, return to "correct" spelling which led to the "b" in "subtle" and "debt" as a reminder of the latin origin (debt comes from debitum which has a "b"). Also, some words have entered English twice. "Chief" and "Chef" both have the same french root, which is thought in turn to come from the latin for "head".

Samuel Johnson's dictionary (1755) wasn't the very first, but was the first substantial one that people refer to

Contemporary lang change- estuary english, slang etc

Terms - like amelioration (meaning of word becomes better),perjoration (meaning of word becoming worse), broadening (word means more than one thing), narrowing (word means fewer things now), coinings/neologisms (new words, like 'kodak'), loan words (words from other langs etc) etc. These are all examples of semantic change.


Reasons for language change
* Blurring of the class structure - fewer extremes
* Proliferation of TV and film
* Education - compulsory education etc
* New technology
* Rise of youth culture
* Media & public broadcasting
* Impact of foreign invasion (Norse, Norman French)
* Printing press - introducd by William Caxton in 1476 - used East Midlands dialect - dialect of education (Oxbridge) etc, became Standard Eng. Printing press worked by ordering letter blocks, so the actual font needed to be standardised. As well as that, spelling and language was standardised to a certain extent as well. Perhaps most importantly is that it was the portal into the world of written texts, which allowed them to be passed around and transported all across the country, which may have contributed to standardising language.
* Rise of merchant classes
* Scientific development/technology
* King James Bible

Also remember, language is still changing. Through media, travel, politics, etc.
* English has become a significant global language due to expansion of the British Empire, and, more recently, the significance that the USA have across the world.
* English exists as many different varieties due to the influence of the native languages of the countries which adapt English into their culture.
* It is possible that all these varieties of language could lead to language decay, whereby no-one would be able to understand the other varieties of English
* English could become more 'standardised' among nations due to the increase in communications (internet, tv, film, media in general) that a shared culture is created --> A shared culture means a shared language is required.

Some still think language is decaying... but we can't really say that - we're descriptivists, remember! :biggrin: But their views are expressed in:
* Crumbling castle view - language is a beautiful building which must be preserved as is. But how would we coin new words? (This is the problem in France - the Académie française/French Academy which doesn't allow for English loanwords to prevent the anglicisation of the French language - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_academy)
* Damp spoon theory - language changes because people are lazy - 'I must own to a queasy distaste for the vulgarity of "between you and I", "these sort", "the media is" ... precisely the kind of distaste I feel at seeing a damp spoon dipped in the sugar bowl or butter spread with the breadknife' (Guardian 9-9-1968)
* See http://www.ling.ohio-state.edu/~maynell/Apr.02.03.pdf for more info.

These are quite prescriptivist attitudes, of course!

Prescriptivists include: Defoe, Swift and Johnson, who all attempted to regulate the language.

They also talked of setting up an academy (as in France) to resurrect/regulate/preserve language?



Theorists

Suzanne Romaine '98
* Internal: formation of new words and the influence of dictionaries etc. Looks at what happens inside the language
* External: the changing social contexts, language as an ongoing process

Donald Mackinnon '96 - categorises the attitudes people have to language use:
* incorrect or corect
* pleasant or ugly
* socially acceptable or socially unacceptable
* morally acceptable or morally unacceptable (political correctness: conscious process, never clear cut and very context dependant, normally a negative thing)
* appropriate in context or inappropriate
* useful or useless

Labov - 'Martha's Vineyard Research': we subconsciously change our language to identify ourselves with one group rather than another
http://www.putlearningfirst.com/language/research/vinyard.html




Quotes to do with Lang Change

Rod Steiger - "communication without purpose is artistic masturbation"



What you look at in Lang Change
This area of study is designed to engage candidates in explorations of
historical and contemporary changes in the English language together
with consideration of explanations of their causes and effects.
Candidates will need to draw on their knowledge of systematic
frameworks, so that they can see how change affects semantics as well
as grammar, lexis and phonology. This module will focus on the
following areas for study

Change as an inherent feature of living language

A brief overview of the historical development of English to
identify different ways in which language changes over time and
continues to change in contemporary experience

The ways in which style has changed in spoken and written English

The socio-cultural causes and consequences of language change in
English over time

The relationship between dialectical variation and temporal change.



Stronger answers
• addressed the question relevantly;
• engaged with the data in detail and with attention to its context;
• identified patterns and examples across the data set;
• expressed ideas clearly and accurately with appropriate terminology;
• identified language features accurately including grammatical and pragmatic aspects;
• showed informed insight into the data set whilst being cautious of its limitations;
• reflected an open-minded and tentative approach to the issues raised;
• showed assured conceptualised knowledge of language theories and studies;
• demonstrated strengths in quality of explanation and accuracy of expression.

Weaker answers:
• gave little or narrow relevant coverage of the question or the data;
• engaged with the data descriptively or by content summary;
• used language imprecisely with limited terminology;
• asserted ideas with underdeveloped explanations;
• showed limited knowledge and understanding of the issues;
• made no references to research ideas or few and simplistic references;
• treated the dataset as uncomplicatedly representative of the given situation;
• listed examples without observing underlying patterns;
• made sweeping statements on the basis of limited evidence;
• gave narrow or partial coverage of the issues.


Remember: the examiner is more interested in your observations of the data than chunks of generic essay about theorists, etc.

These might be of interest to people: http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/society_culture/lang_gallery.shtml By David Crystal, has pics of diff stages of Eng :smile: and http://bllearning.co.uk/live/text/ has examples of old texts on there too

Can anyone else add some more on written child lang?

Am editing this as people post, so thanks for all the help!

xx

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1
you've done pretty much the same as me, which is good to know as i didnt think id got enough notes. :smile:
I just dont know how we can add theorists in. youd have to go off at a tangent to mention them.
Reply 2
*loz*
you've done pretty much the same as me, which is good to know as i didnt think id got enough notes. :smile:
I just dont know how we can add theorists in. youd have to go off at a tangent to mention them.


hehe glad there's someone else doing the same!

hmm maybe if you get a transcript of child speech, you could easily get in about caretaker speech. as for cognitive, you could get it in if a child is talkin about abstract ideas, cuz they'd only understand them if they understood the concept. behaviourists...maybe if a child was imitating in the convo, or saying something unusual that they've copied off someone? nativists... if a child is overextending the inflection -s to make feets - they've not finished learning thru trial and error yet? :smile: how does that sound...? perhaps if you can't link a theorist in cuz nothing matches them, you could point out how it DOESN'T support theorists too?
Reply 3
hey do any of you have summary of notes for the lang change?
Reply 4
cheers violetviolin - its startin 2 make sense now lol.
how much dya have to write for each question - about 2 pages or something? im not sure what the marks are
Reply 5
That's really helpful! Rep coming your way.
Reply 6
Example for importance of social interaction: Bard and Sachs. Studied a boy called 'Jim', who was son of two deaf parents. Although he was exposed to TV and radio, his speech development was severely retarded until he attended sessions with a speech therapist --> hence implying that human interaction is necessary, as Jim was obviously ready to talk, but without the social interaction with his therapist, he was unable to do so.

Example to suggest that there is a 'critical time' for language learning: Genie. Found when she was 13 years old, raised by wolves (??? is that right....seems a bit far-fetched!) made only limited progress.

Other stuff for Chomsky: His theory supports the fact that children around the world seem to develop at a similar pace, irrespective of race/culture/mother tongue. (This also 'defies' Skinner's model) Also, the fact that there is a universal grammar amongst all languages of the world. & the fact that children consistently create new forms of language that they would not have heard before.
Reply 7
violetviolin


Language Acquisition

Can anyone else add some more on written child lang?


what about stages of negatives and questions? (if you want me write them up in here just say)
also Katherine Nelson as a theorist? - she found 60% of childrens early word phrases contained nouns, then verbs, pre-mods and phatic.
and Genie (critical period)??
Sx
Reply 8
Geminus

Example to suggest that there is a 'critical time' for language learning: Genie. Found when she was 13 years old, raised by wolves (??? is that right....seems a bit far-fetched!) made only limited progress.


lol she wasnt raised by wolves! she was just neglected by her parents who strapped her to a potty chair and left her in her own poo for years.
http://www.feralchildren.com/en/showchild.php?ch=genie
Sx
Reply 9
:smile: you are right about genie- i did it psychology. i think theres another case about twins who were kept locked up by their family, but they were rescued young so developed normally. that also proves the critical period :smile:
Reply 10
Written child language is definitely my weakness!

You could relate the study of BM Kroll to the child's development. He suggested that there are a number of stages that children go through:

Stage 1- Prepatory Stage - Up to the age of 6
Child masters physical skills needed to write. Learns basic principles of spelling system.

Stage 2 - Consolidation - Ages 6-8
Child writes like they speak. Short, declarative sentences common. Grammatically incomplete sentences. Long strings of sentences joined with simple conjunctions.

Stage 3 - Differentiation Stage (8 - mid teens)
Child becomes more aware of differences between writing and speech. Increasing confidence. More complicated sentences and constructions.
Reply 11
*loz*
:smile: you are right about genie- i did it psychology. i think theres another case about twins who were kept locked up by their family, but they were rescued young so developed normally. that also proves the critical period :smile:


OOoh interesting. Thanks for that!

And thanks Slober! Thought the wolves thing wasn't quite right somehow!!
Reply 12
Geminus
Written child language is definitely my weakness!

You could relate the study of BM Kroll to the child's development. He suggested that there are a number of stages that children go through:



ohh thanks Geminus, i av no idea what this is but i'll go and find out before wednesday!

p.s Wolves - r u thinking of Jungle Book?
Reply 13
ive hardly done anything bout childrens writing in class - so im sticking to the transcripts
Reply 14
slober
what about stages of negatives and questions? (if you want me write them up in here just say)
also Katherine Nelson as a theorist? - she found 60% of childrens early word phrases contained nouns, then verbs, pre-mods and phatic.
and Genie (critical period)??
Sx


Would you mind writing up about negatives please?

Thanks :smile:
Reply 15
the wolves thing sounds like romulus n remus who were raised by wolves and discovered rome, or something like that lol :smile:
Reply 16
i really enjoy studying writting and the ready of children
im really struggling with lang change thou :s-smilie:
Reply 17
ooooo i well cant wait to read all this tomorrow after my french exam :smile: im worried about language acquisition, i just dont feel confident. but im really confident about language change, cos iv read loads about it anyway :smile:
Reply 18
*loz*
the wolves thing sounds like romulus n remus who were raised by wolves and discovered rome, or something like that lol :smile:


That's probably it lol!!

Maybe I can't get my head out of thinking about legends etc following the Editorial Writing exam :wink: Thought it was a bit bizarre!
Reply 19
Geminus
Would you mind writing up about negatives please?

Thanks :smile:


No problem!

Stages of negatives.

Aged 0-15months - Gestures are used to indicate a negative
15-18months - single words "no" "not" are used
2-2 1/2 yrs - "no" and "not" are used either at the beginning or end of a sentance e.g. "no eat" "going not"
3yrs - negatives are used with the correct syntax i.e. intergrated into the sentance
4/5/6yrs - more subtle negatives i.e hardly, are used, more "n't"'s as well, "can't" "won't" etc. Implied negatives are understood, i.e. "we'll go later"

Hope this helps!
Sx