This is the problem with education - exams and coursework. Exams at least aren't opinion (well not in maths or technical computing where you are doing sums and writing facts, other subjects may have opinion fair enough). With coursework, because it is so open ended (at least this coursework I have a D for anyway), and there's a lot of subjective stuff, it is down to opinion. A difference of opinion should not result in a crap grade (that's what a D is).
What annoys me even more is that, in the communication between me and my lecturer (which, fair enough, was minimal because I knew what I was doing), my lecturer didn't have any concerns - the only concerns where with the initial idea but I ironed these out.
Those students who did get a decent grade had work which had no outstanding features to mine.
If logic prevails here, and it probably doesn't, I should have a very high grade because my work had a lot of advanced features. The project was to make a Director Shockwave movie. My work had a paint feature, quizzes, and loads more. All this is worth more than some zoom functionality and the like - which is what my mates did, but they didn't do anything as complex as a paint application.
I've emailed the lecturer and will email my tutor, and I will get the real mark scheme. For now I have the coursework briefing, and I've fulfilled everything on there.
I've heard of select students work being double marked/moderated, but that is hardly fair. If my work is worth an A, it should get an A, and not be brought down because of some procedure bs.
I got a C in another module but I cann accept that as I made elementary mistakes and parts of the work was rushed with poor presentation - all this was very bad for my case. But with this module, a C overall is unacceptable.
Even if my lecturer and some moderator disagreed, I find it shocking I have been marked so low - in a group of 5 other students who have similar marks.
I will definately follow this up!